Literature DB >> 34699994

Body composition predictors of mortality on computed tomography in patients with spinal metastases undergoing surgical treatment.

Michiel E R Bongers1, Olivier Q Groot1, Colleen G Buckless2, Neal D Kapoor1, Peter K Twining1, Joseph H Schwab1, Martin Torriani2, Miriam A Bredella3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although survival of patients with spinal metastases has improved over the last decades due to advances in multi-modal therapy, there are currently no reliable predictors of mortality. Body composition measurements obtained using computed tomography (CT) have been recently proposed as biomarkers for survival in patients with and without cancer. Patients with cancer routinely undergo CT for staging or surveillance of therapy. Body composition assessed using opportunistic CTs might be used to determine survival in patients with spinal metastases.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the value of body composition measures obtained on opportunistic abdomen CTs to predict 90-day and 1-year mortality in patients with spinal metastases undergoing surgery. We hypothesized that low muscle and abdominal fat mass were positive predictors of mortality. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study at a single tertiary care center in the United States. PATIENT SAMPLE: This retrospective study included 196 patients between 2001 and 2016 that were 18 years of age or older, underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastases, and had a preoperative CT of the abdomen within three months prior to surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Ninety-day and 1-year mortality by any cause.
METHODS: Quantification of cross-sectional areas (CSA) and CT attenuation of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and paraspinous and abdominal skeletal muscle were performed on CT images at the level of L4 using an in-house automated algorithm. Sarcopenia was determined by total muscle CSA (cm2) divided by height squared (m2) with cutoff values of <52.4 cm2/m2 for men and <38.5 cm2/m2 for women. Bivariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard analyses were used to determine the associations between body compositions and 90-day and 1-year mortality.
RESULTS: The median age was 62 years (interquartile range=53-70). The mortality rate for 90-day was 24% and 1-year 54%. The presence of sarcopenia was associated with an increased 1-year mortality rate of 66% compared with a 1-year mortality rate of 41% in patients without sarcopenia (hazard ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.61; p=.02) after adjusting for various clinical factors including primary tumor type, ECOG performance status, additional metastases, neurology status, and systemic therapy. Additional analysis showed an association between sarcopenia and increased 1-year mortality when controlling for the prognostic modified Bauer score (HR, 1.58; 95%CI, 1.04-2.40; p=.03). Abdominal fat CSAs or muscle attenuation were not independently associated with mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality for patients surgically treated for spinal metastases. Sarcopenia retained an independent association with mortality when controlling for the prognostic modified Bauer score. This implies that body composition measurements such as sarcopenia could serve as novel biomarkers for prediction of mortality and may supplement other existing prognostic tools to improve shared decision making for patients with spinal metastases that are contemplating surgical treatment.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adipose tissue; Body composition; Computed tomography (CT); Mortality; Predictor; Sarcopenia; Spinal metastases; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34699994      PMCID: PMC8957497          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.297


  52 in total

1.  Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Roy A Patchell; Phillip A Tibbs; William F Regine; Richard Payne; Stephen Saris; Richard J Kryscio; Mohammed Mohiuddin; Byron Young
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 20-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Management - spinal metastases.

Authors:  Anick Nater; Arjun Sahgal; Michael Fehlings
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

4.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Predicting survival for metastatic spine disease: a comparison of nine scoring systems.

Authors:  A Karim Ahmed; C Rory Goodwin; Amir Heravi; Rachel Kim; Nancy Abu-Bonsrah; Eric Sankey; Daniel Kerekes; Rafael De la Garza Ramos; Joseph Schwab; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Adipose tissue density on CT as a prognostic factor in patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  N D Kapoor; P K Twining; O Q Groot; B J Pielkenrood; M E R Bongers; E T Newman; J J Verlaan; J H Schwab
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Prognostic value of CT attenuation and FDG uptake of adipose tissue in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  J W Lee; S M Lee; Y A Chung
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Prospective validation of a clinical prediction score for survival in patients with spinal metastases: the New England Spinal Metastasis Score.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Marco L Ferrone; Joseph H Schwab; Justin A Blucher; Lauren B Barton; Daniel G Tobert; John H Chi; John H Shin; James D Kang; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Wasting in cancer.

Authors:  M J Tisdale
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 10.  Central obesity as a clinical marker of adiposopathy; increased visceral adiposity as a surrogate marker for global fat dysfunction.

Authors:  Harold Bays
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.243

View more
  2 in total

1.  Body composition predictors of mortality in patients undergoing surgery for long bone metastases.

Authors:  Olivier Q Groot; Michiel E R Bongers; Colleen G Buckless; Peter K Twining; Neal D Kapoor; Stein J Janssen; Joseph H Schwab; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.885

2.  Body Composition Predictors of Adverse Postoperative Events in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Long Bone Metastases.

Authors:  Peter K Twining; Olivier Q Groot; Colleen G Buckless; Neal D Kapoor; Michiel E R Bongers; Stein J Janssen; Joseph H Schwab; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-03-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.