Literature DB >> 34699913

Revision for Aseptic Loosening of Highly Porous Acetabular Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 20,993 Total Hip Replacements.

Wayne Hoskins1, Sophia Rainbird2, Carl Holder3, Stephen E Graves2, Roger Bingham4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Highly porous-coated titanium acetabular components have a high coefficient of friction and ultraporous surfaces to enhance bone ingrowth and osseointegration in total hip arthroplasty (THA). There have been concerns with the development of early radiolucent lines and aseptic loosening of highly porous acetabular components. It is unclear whether these concerns relate to a specific implant or the entire class. The aim of this study is to compare the revision rates for aseptic loosening of highly porous acetabular combinations in primary THA using data from a large joint replacement registry.
METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry for the study period September 1999 to December 2019. All primary THA procedures recorded and performed for osteoarthritis using the most common combinations for each highly porous acetabular component with highly cross-linked polyethylene and a 32-mm or 36-mm femoral head were included. The primary outcome measure was revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. Results were adjusted for patient age and gender.
RESULTS: There were 20,993 primary THA procedures performed for osteoarthritis using a highly porous acetabular component across 6 combinations. Relative to the POLARSTEM/R3 (StikTite), the Exeter V40/Tritanium had a significantly higher risk of revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (hazard ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.74, P = .014). There was no difference between any other highly porous acetabular component combination and no late revisions for aseptic loosening.
CONCLUSION: Highly porous-coated titanium acetabular components have low rates of aseptic loosening with long-term follow-up. A difference between components may exist. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hip prosthesis; loosening; osteoarthritis; revision; total hip replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34699913     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  The influence of stem alignment on the bone mineral density around the Polarstem following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Masahiro Fujita; Shinya Hayashi; Shingo Hashimoto; Yuichi Kuroda; Ryosuke Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Implant survival of cemented arthroplasty following failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures in patients aged 30-60 years: a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 10 years.

Authors:  Mingliang Yu; Minji Yu; Yaodong Zhang; Huihui Cheng; Xianshang Zeng; Si Li; Weiguang Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Network-Based Pharmacology and Bioinformatics Study on the Mechanism of Action of Gujiansan in the Treatment of Steroid-Induced Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Guo-Wu Ren; Shuai-Bo Wen; Jie Han; Zhi-Wei Xu; Wen Qi; Yu-Zhi Shang; Yu-Kun Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.246

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.