Literature DB >> 34699459

Poor Serologic Response to 2 Doses of an mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Thijs W Hoffman1, B Meek2, G T Rijkers3, D A van Kessel1,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34699459      PMCID: PMC8667675          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   5.385


× No keyword cloud information.
Lung transplant recipients are at an increased risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has been recommended,[1] but an impaired response has been observed in solid organ transplant recipients.[2] For lung transplant recipients, impaired response to vaccination might be an especially pressing issue, as they usually receive more intensive immunosuppressive therapy compared with other solid organ transplant recipients. However, lung transplant recipients only represented a small proportion of the solid organ transplant recipients in whom the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been studied. In this study, we analyzed the serologic response to 2 doses of an mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in our cohort of 91 lung transplant recipients who were vaccinated in April and May 2021 (BNT162b2 [n = 2] or mRNA-1273 [n = 89]). The median time since lung transplantation was 5.35 y (interquartile range, 1.87–9.71 y). SARS-CoV-2 spike S1/S2 protein-specific immunoglobulin G antibody levels were measured before, 4 wk after the first dose and 6 wk after the second dose on the Liaison platform (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy). All patients gave written informed consent for the use of their data in clinical research. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. In patients without COVID-19 before vaccination, the serologic response rate after 2 vaccine doses was 27% (Figure 1). Notably, in patients who had COVID-19 before vaccination (n = 12), the response rate was significantly higher at 75% (P = 0.002). This confirms that immunological memory is induced during and after the infection even in this immunocompromised patient population. This would argue for repeated exposure to SARS-CoV-2 antigens as a method for obtaining an improved serologic response. Importantly, 2 recent studies showed a clear improvement in serologic responses after a third dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients.[3,4] In contrast, there were 3 patients who had COVID-19 before vaccination but did not develop measurable antibodies after the vaccinations. Thus, even having had COVID-19 is not likely to be protective in all solid organ transplant patients. We have not witnessed breakthrough infections in our patients thus far, but these have been reported in other solid organ transplant recipients who had received a complete vaccination schedule.[5]
FIGURE 1.

Grouped scatter plot showing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in lung transplant recipients before vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 4 wk after the first vaccination and 6 wk after the second vaccination. Error bars represent the group median with 25th and 75th percentiles. All values below the lower detection limit of the assay were set to 0. After the second vaccination, antibody levels were significantly higher in patients who had had COVID-19 before vaccination (n = 12) compared with patients who had not had COVID-19 (n = 80; median 800 AU/mL [IQR, 63.25–800] vs 0.00 [0.00–16.30]; P < 0.001). The dashed line represents the 2.5th percentile value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies after the first and second vaccination in 102 healthy volunteers, as provided by the manufacturer (after the first vaccination, the 2.5th percentile was 25 AU/mL, and the median value 138 AU/mL; after the second vaccination, the 2.5th percentile was 372 AU/mL and the median value 1706 AU/mL) (https://www.diasorin.com/sites/default/files/immagini/ese_infografica_vaccinated_indivuduals_m0870004414_lr.pdf). COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IQR, interquartile range; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Grouped scatter plot showing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in lung transplant recipients before vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 4 wk after the first vaccination and 6 wk after the second vaccination. Error bars represent the group median with 25th and 75th percentiles. All values below the lower detection limit of the assay were set to 0. After the second vaccination, antibody levels were significantly higher in patients who had had COVID-19 before vaccination (n = 12) compared with patients who had not had COVID-19 (n = 80; median 800 AU/mL [IQR, 63.25–800] vs 0.00 [0.00–16.30]; P < 0.001). The dashed line represents the 2.5th percentile value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies after the first and second vaccination in 102 healthy volunteers, as provided by the manufacturer (after the first vaccination, the 2.5th percentile was 25 AU/mL, and the median value 138 AU/mL; after the second vaccination, the 2.5th percentile was 372 AU/mL and the median value 1706 AU/mL) (https://www.diasorin.com/sites/default/files/immagini/ese_infografica_vaccinated_indivuduals_m0870004414_lr.pdf). COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IQR, interquartile range; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. A positive serologic response was also associated with younger age (P = 0.002), not using tacrolimus as an immunosuppressant (P = 0.04), and a normal response to previous pneumococcal vaccination (P = 0.03). Serologic response was not associated with the dose of mycophenolate mofetil or prednisone. In a multivariate model, both age at vaccination and having had COVID-19 before vaccination retained statistical significance (P = 0.002 and P = 0.002, respectively). In conclusion, and important for clinical practice, the response to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is poor in lung transplant recipients. Factors associated with a positive serologic response were younger age at vaccination, having had COVID-19 before vaccination, and not using tacrolimus as an immunosuppressant. Lung transplant recipients will likely remain at risk for severe COVID-19, even after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Future studies will have to determine the optimal vaccination schedule.
  5 in total

1.  Antibody Response to 2-Dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Series in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Brian J Boyarsky; William A Werbel; Robin K Avery; Aaron A R Tobian; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  COVID-19 vaccination in our transplant recipients: The time is now.

Authors:  Saima Aslam; Daniel R Goldstein; Robin Vos; Andrew E Gelman; Michelle M Kittleson; Cameron Wolfe; Lara Danziger-Isakov
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Clinically Significant COVID-19 Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Demetra Tsapepas; Kathryn Paget; Sumit Mohan; David J Cohen; S Ali Husain
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Randomized Trial of a Third Dose of mRNA-1273 Vaccine in Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Victoria G Hall; Victor H Ferreira; Terrance Ku; Matthew Ierullo; Beata Majchrzak-Kita; Cecilia Chaparro; Nazia Selzner; Jeffrey Schiff; Michael McDonald; George Tomlinson; Vathany Kulasingam; Deepali Kumar; Atul Humar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Three Doses of an mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Nassim Kamar; Florence Abravanel; Olivier Marion; Chloé Couat; Jacques Izopet; Arnaud Del Bello
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Torque teno virus DNA load as a predictive marker of antibody response to a three-dose regimen of COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccine in lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  Floriane Gallais; Benjamin Renaud-Picard; Morgane Solis; Elodie Laugel; Eric Soulier; Sophie Caillard; Romain Kessler; Samira Fafi-Kremer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 13.569

2.  Immunogenicity and Risk Factors Associated With Poor Humoral Immune Response of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Recipients of Solid Organ Transplant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kasama Manothummetha; Nipat Chuleerarux; Anawin Sanguankeo; Olivia S Kates; Nattiya Hirankarn; Achitpol Thongkam; M Veronica Dioverti-Prono; Pattama Torvorapanit; Nattapong Langsiri; Navaporn Worasilchai; Chatphatai Moonla; Rongpong Plongla; William M Garneau; Ariya Chindamporn; Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn; Tany Thaniyavarn; Saman Nematollahi; Nitipong Permpalung
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Serologic response to a third dose of an mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  T W Hoffman; B Meek; G T Rijkers; D A van Kessel
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.032

4.  Seroconversions After Withdrawal From Mycophenolate Mofetil in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Without a Third Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine: A Case Series.

Authors:  Tetsuji Morishita; Akiyoshi Sakai; Hidetoshi Matsunami
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in cardiothoracic transplant recipients: predictive factors for humoral response.

Authors:  Angelika Costard-Jäckle; René Schramm; Cornelius Knabbe; Jan Gummert; Bastian Fischer; Rasmus Rivinius; Raphael Bruno; Benjamin Müller; Armin Zittermann; Udo Boeken; Ralf Westenfeld
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.138

6.  Humoral and cellular response of COVID-19 vaccine among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hari Shankar Meshram; Vivek Kute; Hemant Rane; Ruchir Dave; Subho Banerjee; Vineet Mishra; Sanshriti Chauhan
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.