BACKGROUND: Facial deformities in syndromic craniosynostosis are not only functionally, psychosocially, and aesthetically impairing but also notoriously challenging to reconstruct. Whether facial suture synostosis plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of these deformities is inadequately studied in human patients. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was queried using a methodologically generated search term inventory. Article inclusion was adjudicated by 2 authors after independent review. Articles provided insight into facial suture involvement in either syndromic craniosynostosis patients or animal models of disease. RESULTS: Comprehensive review yielded 19 relevant articles meeting inclusion criteria. Mid-20th century craniofacial biologists characterized how patent facial sutures are essential for normal postnatal facial development. They also posited that premature ossification disrupts growth vectors, causing significant dysmorphologies. Recently, facial suture synostosis was found to cause midfacial deformities independent of cranial base pathology in mouse models of syndromic craniosynostosis. Few recent studies have begun exploring facial suture involvement in patients, and although they have paved the way for future research, they bear significant limitations. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that facial suture synostosis acts in conjunction with cranial base pathology to produce the prominent, multifocal facial deformities in syndromic craniosynostosis may fundamentally alter surgical management and warrants further investigation. Methodically evaluating the literature, this review synthesizes all basic science and human clinical research thus far on the role of facial sutures in syndromic craniosynostosis and elucidates important topics for future research. We ultimately identify the need for rigorous imaging studies that longitudinally evaluate facial osteology across patients with various craniosynostosis syndromes.
BACKGROUND: Facial deformities in syndromic craniosynostosis are not only functionally, psychosocially, and aesthetically impairing but also notoriously challenging to reconstruct. Whether facial suture synostosis plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of these deformities is inadequately studied in human patients. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was queried using a methodologically generated search term inventory. Article inclusion was adjudicated by 2 authors after independent review. Articles provided insight into facial suture involvement in either syndromic craniosynostosis patients or animal models of disease. RESULTS: Comprehensive review yielded 19 relevant articles meeting inclusion criteria. Mid-20th century craniofacial biologists characterized how patent facial sutures are essential for normal postnatal facial development. They also posited that premature ossification disrupts growth vectors, causing significant dysmorphologies. Recently, facial suture synostosis was found to cause midfacial deformities independent of cranial base pathology in mouse models of syndromic craniosynostosis. Few recent studies have begun exploring facial suture involvement in patients, and although they have paved the way for future research, they bear significant limitations. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that facial suture synostosis acts in conjunction with cranial base pathology to produce the prominent, multifocal facial deformities in syndromic craniosynostosis may fundamentally alter surgical management and warrants further investigation. Methodically evaluating the literature, this review synthesizes all basic science and human clinical research thus far on the role of facial sutures in syndromic craniosynostosis and elucidates important topics for future research. We ultimately identify the need for rigorous imaging studies that longitudinally evaluate facial osteology across patients with various craniosynostosis syndromes.
Authors: Jesse A Goldstein; J Thomas Paliga; Jason D Wink; Scott P Bartlett; Hyun-Duc Nah; Jesse A Taylor Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Yingli Wang; Ran Xiao; Fan Yang; Baktiar O Karim; Anthony J Iacovelli; Juanliang Cai; Charles P Lerner; Joan T Richtsmeier; Jen M Leszl; Cheryl A Hill; Kai Yu; David M Ornitz; Jennifer Elisseeff; David L Huso; Ethylin Wang Jabs Journal: Development Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Trish E Parsons; Seth M Weinberg; Kameron Khaksarfard; R Nicole Howie; Mohammed Elsalanty; Jack C Yu; James J Cray Journal: Anat Rec (Hoboken) Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.064
Authors: Stephen R F Twigg; Chris Healy; Christian Babbs; Jacqueline A Sharpe; William G Wood; Paul T Sharpe; Gillian M Morriss-Kay; Andrew O M Wilkie Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.780
Authors: Susan M Motch Perrine; Theodore M Cole; Neus Martínez-Abadías; Kristina Aldridge; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Joan T Richtsmeier Journal: BMC Dev Biol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 1.978