Ludovico Messineo1,2, Danny J Eckert1, Luigi Taranto-Montemurro2, Daniel Vena2, Ali Azarbarzin2, Lauren B Hess2, Nicole Calianese2, David P White2, Andrew Wellman2, Laura Gell2, Scott A Sands2,3. 1. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 2. Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; and. 3. Department of Allergy Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Central Clinical School, The Alfred and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
Rationale: REM sleep is associated with reduced ventilation and greater obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity than non-REM (nREM) sleep for reasons that have not been fully elucidated. Objectives: Here, we use direct physiological measurements to determine whether the pharyngeal compromise in REM sleep OSA is most consistent with 1) withdrawal of neural ventilatory drive or 2) deficits in pharyngeal pathophysiology per se (i.e., increased collapsibility and decreased muscle responsiveness). Methods: Sixty-three participants with OSA completed sleep studies with gold standard measurements of ventilatory "drive" (calibrated intraesophageal diaphragm EMG), ventilation (oronasal "ventilation"), and genioglossus EMG activity. Drive withdrawal was assessed by examining these measurements at nadir drive (first decile of drive within a stage). Pharyngeal physiology was assessed by examining collapsibility (lowered ventilation at eupneic drive) and responsiveness (ventilation-drive slope). Mixed-model analysis compared REM sleep with nREM sleep; sensitivity analysis examined phasic REM sleep. Measurements and Main Results: REM sleep (⩾10 min) was obtained in 25 patients. Compared with drive in nREM sleep, drive in REM sleep dipped to markedly lower nadir values (first decile, estimate [95% confidence interval], -21.8% [-31.2% to -12.4%] of eupnea; P < 0.0001), with an accompanying reduction in ventilation (-25.8% [-31.8% to -19.8%] of eupnea; P < 0.0001). However, there was no effect of REM sleep on collapsibility (ventilation at eupneic drive), baseline genioglossus EMG activity, or responsiveness. REM sleep was associated with increased OSA severity (+10.1 [1.8 to 19.8] events/h), but this association was not present after adjusting for nadir drive (+4.3 [-4.2 to 14.6] events/h). Drive withdrawal was exacerbated in phasic REM sleep. Conclusions: In patients with OSA, the pharyngeal compromise characteristic of REM sleep appears to be predominantly explained by ventilatory drive withdrawal rather than by preferential decrements in muscle activity or responsiveness. Preventing drive withdrawal may be the leading target for REM sleep OSA.
Rationale: REM sleep is associated with reduced ventilation and greater obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity than non-REM (nREM) sleep for reasons that have not been fully elucidated. Objectives: Here, we use direct physiological measurements to determine whether the pharyngeal compromise in REM sleep OSA is most consistent with 1) withdrawal of neural ventilatory drive or 2) deficits in pharyngeal pathophysiology per se (i.e., increased collapsibility and decreased muscle responsiveness). Methods: Sixty-three participants with OSA completed sleep studies with gold standard measurements of ventilatory "drive" (calibrated intraesophageal diaphragm EMG), ventilation (oronasal "ventilation"), and genioglossus EMG activity. Drive withdrawal was assessed by examining these measurements at nadir drive (first decile of drive within a stage). Pharyngeal physiology was assessed by examining collapsibility (lowered ventilation at eupneic drive) and responsiveness (ventilation-drive slope). Mixed-model analysis compared REM sleep with nREM sleep; sensitivity analysis examined phasic REM sleep. Measurements and Main Results: REM sleep (⩾10 min) was obtained in 25 patients. Compared with drive in nREM sleep, drive in REM sleep dipped to markedly lower nadir values (first decile, estimate [95% confidence interval], -21.8% [-31.2% to -12.4%] of eupnea; P < 0.0001), with an accompanying reduction in ventilation (-25.8% [-31.8% to -19.8%] of eupnea; P < 0.0001). However, there was no effect of REM sleep on collapsibility (ventilation at eupneic drive), baseline genioglossus EMG activity, or responsiveness. REM sleep was associated with increased OSA severity (+10.1 [1.8 to 19.8] events/h), but this association was not present after adjusting for nadir drive (+4.3 [-4.2 to 14.6] events/h). Drive withdrawal was exacerbated in phasic REM sleep. Conclusions: In patients with OSA, the pharyngeal compromise characteristic of REM sleep appears to be predominantly explained by ventilatory drive withdrawal rather than by preferential decrements in muscle activity or responsiveness. Preventing drive withdrawal may be the leading target for REM sleep OSA.
Entities:
Keywords:
REM sleep hypotonia; REM sleep pathogenesis; drive withdrawal; pharyngeal muscle responsiveness; phasic and tonic REM sleep
Authors: Susheel P Patil; Naresh M Punjabi; Hartmut Schneider; Christopher P O'Donnell; Philip L Smith; Alan R Schwartz Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-04-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Scott A Sands; Philip I Terrill; Bradley A Edwards; Luigi Taranto Montemurro; Ali Azarbarzin; Melania Marques; Camila M de Melo; Stephen H Loring; James P Butler; David P White; Andrew Wellman Journal: Sleep Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Richard B Berry; Rohit Budhiraja; Daniel J Gottlieb; David Gozal; Conrad Iber; Vishesh K Kapur; Carole L Marcus; Reena Mehra; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan; Susan Redline; Kingman P Strohl; Sally L Davidson Ward; Michelle M Tangredi Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Dwayne L Mann; Philip I Terrill; Ali Azarbarzin; Sara Mariani; Angelo Franciosini; Alessandra Camassa; Thomas Georgeson; Melania Marques; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Ludovico Messineo; Susan Redline; Andrew Wellman; Scott A Sands Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Raichel M Alex; Tamar Sofer; Ali Azarbarzin; Daniel Vena; Laura K Gell; Andrew Wellman; David P White; Susan Redline; Scott A Sands Journal: Sleep Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 6.313
Authors: Winfried Randerath; Jan de Lange; Jan Hedner; Jean Pierre T F Ho; Marie Marklund; Sofia Schiza; Jörg Steier; Johan Verbraecken Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2022-06-27