| Literature DB >> 34697831 |
Michel Pompeu Sá1,2, Basel Ramlawi1,2, Serge Sicouri2, Gianluca Torregrossa2, Qasim Al Abri3, Jörg Kempfert4,5, Markus Kofler4,5, Volkmar Falk4,5,6,7,8, Axel Unbehaun4,5, Karel M Van Praet4,5.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has already received the green light for high-, intermediate- and low-risk profiles and is an alternative for all patients regardless of age. It is clear that there has been a push towards the use of TAVR in younger and younger patients (<65 years), which has never been formally tested in randomized controlled trials but seems inevitable as TAVR technology makes steady progress. Lifetime management as a concept will set the tone in the field of the structural heart. Some subjects in this scenario arise, including the importance of optimized prosthetic hemodynamics for lifetime care; surgical procedures in the aortic root; management of structural valve degeneration with valve-in-valve procedures (TAVR-in-surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] and TAVR-in-TAVR) and redo SAVR; commissural alignment and cusp overlap for TAVR; the rise in the number of surgical procedures for TAVR explantation; and the renewed interest in the Ross procedure. This article reviews all these issues which will become commonplace during heart team meetings and preoperative conversations with patients in the coming years.Entities:
Keywords: aortic valve; aortic valve stenosis; cardiac surgical procedure; cardiovascular surgical procedures; heart valve prosthesis implantation; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34697831 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Card Surg ISSN: 0886-0440 Impact factor: 1.620