Literature DB >> 34697096

Genome sequencing as a diagnostic test.

Gregory Costain1, Ronald D Cohn2, Stephen W Scherer2, Christian R Marshall2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34697096      PMCID: PMC8562981          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.210549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


× No keyword cloud information.
Genome sequencing is a comprehensive genetic test that is being integrated into health care systems internationally. Test indications include suspected genetic disorders in children and adults for whom a targeted genetic testing approach is likely to be low yield or has already failed. Analytic validity, diagnostic yield and clinical utility are similar or superior to other clinical genetic tests, such as exome sequencing, chromosomal microarray analysis and next-generation sequencing gene panel tests. Appropriate adoption of genome sequencing as a molecular diagnostic test in Canada would be facilitated by a cohesive national strategy for genomic medicine. Genetic testing of patient constitutional DNA (i.e., their genome) is increasingly performed in medical practice. 1–3 Sequencing an entire human genome (about 3.2 billion nucleotides) is now possible to complete in days to weeks, and at a similar cost to some advanced imaging tests or to a brief admission to hospital.3,4 Genome sequencing is being integrated into health care systems internationally, most notably in the United Kingdom.5 Starting in 2021, genome sequencing is being performed as a clinical genetic test in Ontario, Canada.

What is genome sequencing?

Genome sequencing (or whole genome sequencing) is a comprehensive test capable of detecting nearly all DNA variation in a genome. Sequencing can diagnose most of the > 6000 conditions listed in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database (www.omim.org) for which the genetic basis is currently understood. These include cystic fibrosis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, familial hypercholesterolemia, hemophilia A, Lynch syndrome, Marfan syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia. Most diagnoses are individually rare (i.e., < 1 in 2000 live births) or ultrarare (i.e., < 100 people reported in the medical literature), and thus less likely to be suspected a priori (e.g., Kabuki syndrome; Figure 1). Patients may present with unusual constellations of features, or with common diseases like autism spectrum disorder, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, epilepsy, cancer, schizophrenia or dementia, although this list is not comprehensive.
Figure 1:

Genome sequencing process. Middle panel was adapted from “Whole Genome Sequencing” by BioRender.com (2021); retrieved from https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates. Note: Variants in the KDM6A gene are linked to Kabuki syndrome. After appropriate pretest counselling, including review of possible results, a DNA sample is obtained from the patient, usually via a blood draw. Samples from biological parents are often sequenced at the same time to give additional context regarding inheritance. DNA is fragmented into small pieces and run on a high-throughput sequencing machine to generate millions of “nucleotide reads.” Reads are aligned to a reference genome, like puzzle pieces being assembled by looking at the image pictured on the box. The average number of reads covering a given genomic position (the “read depth”) is typically 30–40. Variants (differences) from that reference are annotated using sophisticated bioinformatics tools and large-scale databases of genomic variation. These variants are filtered and reviewed by a genome analyst to identify 1 or more that might be causal for the observed clinical presentation.

Genome sequencing process. Middle panel was adapted from “Whole Genome Sequencing” by BioRender.com (2021); retrieved from https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates. Note: Variants in the KDM6A gene are linked to Kabuki syndrome. After appropriate pretest counselling, including review of possible results, a DNA sample is obtained from the patient, usually via a blood draw. Samples from biological parents are often sequenced at the same time to give additional context regarding inheritance. DNA is fragmented into small pieces and run on a high-throughput sequencing machine to generate millions of “nucleotide reads.” Reads are aligned to a reference genome, like puzzle pieces being assembled by looking at the image pictured on the box. The average number of reads covering a given genomic position (the “read depth”) is typically 30–40. Variants (differences) from that reference are annotated using sophisticated bioinformatics tools and large-scale databases of genomic variation. These variants are filtered and reviewed by a genome analyst to identify 1 or more that might be causal for the observed clinical presentation. Genome sequencing is broader in scope than other commonly used genetic tests (Box 1), and data can be analyzed in both hypothesis-driven and hypothesis-generating ways. For these reasons, genome sequencing will likely eventually supplant exome sequencing, large next-generation sequencing gene panel tests and chromosomal microarray analysis.

Overview of selected clinical genetic test modalities6

For patients with phenotypes with known genetic heterogeneity, the following tests are commonly employed in clinical practice: Chromosomal microarray analysis: a genome-wide test that typically detects only copy number variations (i.e., chromosome imbalances). Next-generation sequencing gene panel test: a targeted test focusing on a predefined list of genes that typically detects only exonic sequence-level variants and exon-level deletions or duplications in those genes. Exome sequencing: a genome-wide test that typically detects only exonic sequence-level variants, a subset of exon-level deletions or duplications, and a subset of copy number variations. Genome sequencing: this approach offers myriad advantages as a single comprehensive test. Current short-read genome sequencing can reliably detect sequence, structural and copy number variations, both within and outside of exons, as well as clinically relevant short tandem repeats, pseudogenes and mitochondrial DNA variation.

How is genome sequencing delivered?

Genome sequencing is a 3-stage process (Figure 1). First, a medical geneticist or other health care professional collects the necessary information on phenotype and family history. Second, the genome data are generated and reviewed by a clinical laboratory geneticist. Third, a physician correlates the genetic findings with the clinical phenotype. Primary findings are genetic variants that may explain all or a component of the clinical presentation. Identifying such results is the main purpose of genome sequencing as a clinical diagnostic test. In North America, some laboratories will also actively look for secondary findings, namely disease-causing variants in specific genes associated with medically actionable conditions that are unrelated to the reason for testing.7 Communication of results is embedded within the framework of genetic counselling (Box 2) and is often facilitated by a medical geneticist and genetic counsellor.

Overview of genetic counselling

Genetic counsellors are health professionals with specialized training and experience in providing genetic counselling. In Canada, they may be members of the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors (www.cagc-accg.ca/). The National Society of Genetic Counselors defines genetic counselling as “the process of helping people understand and adapt to the medical, psychological and familial implications of genetic contributions to disease. This process integrates the following: Interpretation of family and medical histories to assess the chance of disease occurrence or recurrence. Education about inheritance, testing, management, prevention, resources and research. Counselling to promote informed choices and adaptation to the risk or condition.”8 Professional societies like the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists9 and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics10 recognize the importance of pre- and post-test genetic counselling in the context of clinical genome-wide (i.e., exome or genome) sequencing. DNA sequencing is becoming less expensive and more accurate because of technological advances. However, the cost of offering genome sequencing as a clinical test is still in the range of several thousand Canadian dollars per family-based investigation, not including up-front investments in personnel, equipment and infrastructure.

Who is eligible for genome sequencing?

Genome sequencing is a consideration for children and adults with suspected genetic disorders for whom a targeted genetic testing approach is unlikely to succeed or has already failed. In Ontario, genome sequencing is undergoing a 2-year pilot assessment as part of the Genome-wide Sequencing Ontario project (www.gsontario.ca), with publication of interim results pending. Testing can be ordered only by a medical geneticist or other physician with comparable expertise. The approval criteria currently favour individuals with multiple unexplained congenital anomalies or a moderate-to-severe developmental disability, and affect scenarios where a unifying diagnosis is expected to impact management.

What are the harms?

The procedure of sequencing is safe; however, possible negative consequences are tied to how results are interpreted and disclosed. First, genome sequencing can be misconstrued as a diagnostic panacea. Accurate clinical information and family history remain important for interpreting results. A positive result may not explain all of the patient’s features, and a negative result does not rule out a genetic contribution or invalidate an unambiguous clinical diagnosis.11 Second, the classification of a genetic variant can change over time as new information becomes available.12 Certain ethnic groups remain under-represented in the large-scale reference databases of genomic variation that guide interpretation, and therefore misdiagnosis is a possibility for these groups.12 Third, genetic test results can reveal unexpected information about the individual, family members or their relationships to one another. These considerations underscore the importance of detailed pre- and post-test counselling and the need for trained genetics professionals (Box 2). An additional safeguard against harms is Canada’s Genetic Non-Discrimination Act, which became law in 2017 and is intended to protect individuals from genetic discrimination on the basis of their test results.13

What is the evidence so far?

Most data are from prospective observational trials of testing in clinically heterogeneous populations with suspected rare genetic diseases. 1,2,4,5,14,15 Primary outcome measures are usually diagnostic yield or time to diagnosis. Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness are secondary outcomes of interest. Genome sequencing has a higher diagnostic yield than exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis, 1,11,14,15 at an increasingly competitive cost.2 Different phenotype categories are associated with different diagnostic yields.2,3,5 For example, yield may be more than 50% in individuals with severe-toprofound intellectual disability, but less than 10% in most cohorts with single, major congenital anomalies. One comprehensive review of the literature identified 36 studies addressing key laboratory and clinical issues that collectively support a role for genome sequencing in place of other current standard genetic tests (Box 1).2 The use of genome sequencing with rapid turnaround time is most well established in neonatal and pediatric intensive care settings, including 2 randomized controlled trials showing increased timely diagnostic yield and clinical utility relative to routine testing.1,4

What can be expected in the future?

Genome sequencing is anticipated to become a first-tier investigation in children and adults with suspected genetic conditions that have high genetic heterogeneity (i.e., a broad genetic differential diagnosis with many candidate genes or loci).2,3,5,11,14,15 This will curtail the longstanding practice of ordering multiple genetic tests sequentially and shorten many diagnostic odysseys. Results returned to patients may also include pharmacogenetic profiles, reproductive carrier status information and genetic risk profiles for later-onset conditions.16 The role for genome sequencing as a preventive health tool in ostensibly healthy individuals remains unclear.16 Further evidence is needed regarding the clinical utility, cost-effectiveness and possible unintended downstream consequences of genome sequencing within our health care system. The added yield of genome sequencing over exome sequencing remains modest in some cohorts; however, this gap will widen with advances in data analysis and larger data sets to compare against.2,11,15 The anticipation of additional clinically relevant information arising from as-yet-unexplored areas of the genome is also driving investments in genome sequencing technology.2,5,11 Appropriate adoption of genome sequencing as a diagnostic test in Canada would be facilitated by a coordinated national strategy for genomic medicine that couples basic and clinical research, as exists in the United Kingdom and Australia. Translational genomics projects, such as Care4Rare Canada (www.care4rare.ca), the CAUSES Clinic at BC Children’s Hospital, the Integrated Centre for Pediatric Clinical Genomics in Montréal, the Silent Genomes Project (www.bcchr.ca/silent-genomes-project), Genome Canada’s All-for-One initiative (www.genomecanada.ca) and the efforts from individual tertiary hospitals (e.g., The Hospital for Sick Children) continue to evolve. These disease-focused initiatives would benefit from a parallel genome sequencing effort of the national population to study the genetic determinants of health. Delivering diagnostic genome sequencing in Canada will also require that more staff be trained, including medical geneticists, clinical laboratory geneticists and genetic counsellors, to enhance the genetic literacy across the diverse population of Canada. Ensuring equitable access to care informed by the DNA code, irrespective of postal code, is a challenge in countries that span a large geography, such as Canada and the United States, but we suggest that this be a priority for policy-makers. CMAJ invites contributions to Innovations, which highlights recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances. Novel uses of older treatments will also be considered. For publication, the benefits of the innovation, its availability and its limitations must be highlighted clearly, but briefly. Visual elements (images) are essential. Submit brief evidence-based articles (maximum 1000 words and five references) to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cmaj or email kirsten.patrick@cmaj.ca to discuss ideas.
  13 in total

1.  The Personal Genome Project Canada: findings from whole genome sequences of the inaugural 56 participants.

Authors:  Miriam S Reuter; Susan Walker; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Joe Whitney; Iris Cohn; Neal Sondheimer; Ryan K C Yuen; Brett Trost; Tara A Paton; Sergio L Pereira; Jo-Anne Herbrick; Richard F Wintle; Daniele Merico; Jennifer Howe; Jeffrey R MacDonald; Chao Lu; Thomas Nalpathamkalam; Wilson W L Sung; Zhuozhi Wang; Rohan V Patel; Giovanna Pellecchia; John Wei; Lisa J Strug; Sherilyn Bell; Barbara Kellam; Melanie M Mahtani; Anne S Bassett; Yvonne Bombard; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Shuman; Ronald D Cohn; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Sarah Bowdin; Matthew R Hildebrandt; Wei Wei; Asli Romm; Peter Pasceri; James Ellis; Peter Ray; M Stephen Meyn; Nasim Monfared; S Mohsen Hosseini; Ann M Joseph-George; Fred W Keeley; Ryan A Cook; Marc Fiume; Hin C Lee; Christian R Marshall; Jill Davies; Allison Hazell; Janet A Buchanan; Michael J Szego; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities.

Authors:  Arjun K Manrai; Birgit H Funke; Heidi L Rehm; Morten S Olesen; Bradley A Maron; Peter Szolovits; David M Margulies; Joseph Loscalzo; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Whole-genome sequencing of patients with rare diseases in a national health system.

Authors:  Ernest Turro; William J Astle; Karyn Megy; Stefan Gräf; Daniel Greene; Olga Shamardina; Hana Lango Allen; Alba Sanchis-Juan; Mattia Frontini; Chantal Thys; Jonathan Stephens; Rutendo Mapeta; Oliver S Burren; Kate Downes; Matthias Haimel; Salih Tuna; Sri V V Deevi; Timothy J Aitman; David L Bennett; Paul Calleja; Keren Carss; Mark J Caulfield; Patrick F Chinnery; Peter H Dixon; Daniel P Gale; Roger James; Ania Koziell; Michael A Laffan; Adam P Levine; Eamonn R Maher; Hugh S Markus; Joannella Morales; Nicholas W Morrell; Andrew D Mumford; Elizabeth Ormondroyd; Stuart Rankin; Augusto Rendon; Sylvia Richardson; Irene Roberts; Noemi B A Roy; Moin A Saleem; Kenneth G C Smith; Hannah Stark; Rhea Y Y Tan; Andreas C Themistocleous; Adrian J Thrasher; Hugh Watkins; Andrew R Webster; Martin R Wilkins; Catherine Williamson; James Whitworth; Sean Humphray; David R Bentley; Nathalie Kingston; Neil Walker; John R Bradley; Sofie Ashford; Christopher J Penkett; Kathleen Freson; Kathleen E Stirrups; F Lucy Raymond; Willem H Ouwehand
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Kandamurugu Manickam; Monica R McClain; Laurie A Demmer; Sawona Biswas; Hutton M Kearney; Jennifer Malinowski; Lauren J Massingham; Danny Miller; Timothy W Yu; Fuki M Hisama
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  David T Miller; Kristy Lee; Wendy K Chung; Adam S Gordon; Gail E Herman; Teri E Klein; Douglas R Stewart; Laura M Amendola; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Michael H Gollob; Steven M Harrison; Ray E Hershberger; Kent McKelvey; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.

Authors:  Kym Boycott; Taila Hartley; Shelin Adam; Francois Bernier; Karen Chong; Bridget A Fernandez; Jan M Friedman; Michael T Geraghty; Stacey Hume; Bartha M Knoppers; Anne-Marie Laberge; Jacek Majewski; Roberto Mendoza-Londono; M Stephen Meyn; Jacques L Michaud; Tanya N Nelson; Julie Richer; Bekim Sadikovic; David L Skidmore; Tracy Stockley; Sherry Taylor; Clara van Karnebeek; Ma'n H Zawati; Julie Lauzon; Christine M Armour
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  Case for genome sequencing in infants and children with rare, undiagnosed or genetic diseases.

Authors:  David Bick; Marilyn Jones; Stacie L Taylor; Ryan J Taft; John Belmont
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  An RCT of Rapid Genomic Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants Results in High Clinical Utility, Changes in Management, and Low Perceived Harm.

Authors:  David P Dimmock; Michelle M Clark; Mary Gaughran; Julie A Cakici; Sara A Caylor; Christina Clarke; Michele Feddock; Shimul Chowdhury; Lisa Salz; Cynthia Cheung; Lynne M Bird; Charlotte Hobbs; Kristen Wigby; Lauge Farnaes; Cinnamon S Bloss; Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 11.043

9.  Genome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Test in Children With Unexplained Medical Complexity.

Authors:  Gregory Costain; Susan Walker; Maria Marano; Danielle Veenma; Meaghan Snell; Meredith Curtis; Stephanie Luca; Jason Buera; Danielle Arje; Miriam S Reuter; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Brett Trost; Wilson W L Sung; Ryan K C Yuen; David Chitayat; Roberto Mendoza-Londono; D James Stavropoulos; Stephen W Scherer; Christian R Marshall; Ronald D Cohn; Eyal Cohen; Julia Orkin; M Stephen Meyn; Robin Z Hayeems
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-09-01

Review 10.  Best practices for the analytical validation of clinical whole-genome sequencing intended for the diagnosis of germline disease.

Authors:  Christian R Marshall; Shimul Chowdhury; Ryan J Taft; Mathew S Lebo; Jillian G Buchan; Steven M Harrison; Ross Rowsey; Eric W Klee; Pengfei Liu; Elizabeth A Worthey; Vaidehi Jobanputra; David Dimmock; Hutton M Kearney; David Bick; Shashikant Kulkarni; Stacie L Taylor; John W Belmont; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Niall J Lennon
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 8.617

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pharmacogenetic profiling via genome sequencing in children with medical complexity.

Authors:  Amy Pan; Sierra Scodellaro; Tayyaba Khan; Inna Ushcatz; Wendy Wu; Meredith Curtis; Eyal Cohen; Ronald D Cohn; Robin Z Hayeems; M Stephen Meyn; Julia Orkin; Jaskiran Otal; Miriam S Reuter; Susan Walker; Stephen W Scherer; Christian R Marshall; Iris Cohn; Gregory Costain
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.953

2.  Innovations in genomics for undiagnosed diseases: vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome.

Authors:  Ryan J Stubbins; Hannah Cherniawsky; Luke Y C Chen; Thomas J Nevill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Chromosomal-level reference genome assembly of the North American wolverine (Gulo gulo luscus): a resource for conservation genomics.

Authors:  Si Lok; Timothy N H Lau; Brett Trost; Amy H Y Tong; Richard F Wintle; Mark D Engstrom; Elise Stacy; Lisette P Waits; Matthew Scrafford; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.542

4. 

Authors:  Ryan J Stubbins; Hannah Cherniawsky; Luke Y C Chen; Thomas J Nevill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 16.859

5.  Return of comprehensive tumour genomic profiling results to advanced cancer patients: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Megan C Best; Nicci Bartley; Christine E Napier; Alana Fisher; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; David Goldstein; Katherine Tucker; Barbara B Biesecker; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 3.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.