| Literature DB >> 34695800 |
Ali Sié, Mamadou Ouattara, Mamadou Bountogo, Clarisse Dah, Guillaume Compaore, Elodie Lebas, Jessica M Brogdon, Ying Lin, William W Godwin, Kieran S O'Brien, Benjamin F Arnold, Thomas M Lietman, Catherine E Oldenburg.
Abstract
Infant undernutrition is thought to contribute to growth failure and mortality. We evaluated the patterns in underweight in a population-based sample of children aged 1-11 months in rural northwestern Burkina Faso. Data were collected during the baseline assessment of a community-randomized trial evaluating mass azithromycin distribution in Nouna District, Burkina Faso. A door-to-door census was undertaken for all households in all communities. Infants aged 1-11 months were weighed for weight-based dosing in the trial and their weights were used to calculate weight-for-age Z-scores (WAZ). Underweight was defined as WAZ ≤ 2. We evaluated the age patterns in WAZ and underweight by demographic, seasonal, and geographic characteristics. Of 7,109 infants, 6,077 had accurate weight and global positioning system (GPS) coordinate data (85.5%). Infants were a median of 6 months old (interquartile range [IQR] 3-8) and 48.4% were female. Mean WAZ was -0.68 (SD 1.6) and 19.0% were underweight. The WAZ decreased with increasing age, and the prevalence of underweight increased from 2.5% among 1-month-olds to 27.6% among 11-month-olds. Underweight was more common among boys than girls (22.1% among boys versus 15.6% among girls). Improved latrine use by the household was associated with increased WAZ, and this effect was stronger in male compared with female infants. Given the large burden of underweight among infants, interventions addressing undernutrition should specifically include infants.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34695800 PMCID: PMC8733516 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 3.707
Demographic characteristics of the study population (N = 6,077)
| Underweight* ( | Not Underweight ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, months, median (IQR) | 7 (5–9) | 6 (3–8) |
| Child’s sex, | ||
| Female | 459 (39.8%) | 2,481 (50.4%) |
| Male | 693 (60.2%) | 2,444 (49.6%) |
| Distance to clinic, km, median (IQR) | 4.2 (1.2–6.5) | 4.4 (1.4–6.8) |
| Mid-upper arm circumference,† cm, median (IQR) | 13 (12.5–13.8) | 14 (13.2–14.6) |
| Weight, kg, median (IQR) | 5.7 (5.0–6.3) | 7.1 (6.1–8.0) |
| Weight-for-age Z-score, mean (SD) | −2.96 (0.81) | −0.14 (1.19) |
| Household latrine type‡ | ||
| Improved | 39 (4.4%) | 208 (5.5%) |
| Unimproved | 458 (52.0%) | 2,038 (53.8%) |
| None | 384 (43.6%) | 1,543 (40.7%) |
| Household water source‡ | ||
| Borehole | 117 (13.3%) | 573 (15.1%) |
| Shallow dug well | 764 (86.7%) | 3,216 (84.9%) |
| Household mobile phone ownership,‡ | 688 (78.5%) | 3,065 (81.4%) |
| Household radio ownership,‡ | 425 (48.9%) | 1,850 (49.4%) |
IQR = interquartile range.
Defined as weight-for-age Z-score < -2.
Measured only in children aged > 6 months.
Measured in a subset of 177 communities with household socioeconomic status data.
Figure 1.(A) Weight-for-age Z-score, (B) weight, and (C) prevalence of underweight (WAZ<−2, C) by child’s sex and age in months. Light gray indicates results for males and dark gray for females.
Figure 2.Weight-for-age Z-score by month of measurements. Light-shaded boxes indicate results for male and dark-shaded boxes for females.
MUAC and underweight among children > 6 months (N = 2,675)
|
| WAZ Mean (SD) | WAZ ≥ 2 | WAZ < 2 to −3 | WAZ < −3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1,994 | 428 | 253 | ||
| MUAC | |||||
| ≥ 12.5 cm | 2,413 | −1.01 (1.3) | 1,902 (95.4%) | 346 (80.8%) | 165 (65.2%) |
| < 12.5 to 11.5 cm | 236 | −2.29 (1.4) | 89 (4.5%) | 76 (17.8%) | 71 (28.1%) |
| < 11.5 cm | 26 | −3.21 (1.0) | 3 (0.2%) | 6 (1.4%) | 17 (6.7%) |
MUAC = mid-upper arm circumference; WAZ = weight-for-age Z-scores.
Associations between weight-for-age Z-score and sociodemographic characteristics
| Age- and sex-adjusted only* | Age- and sex-adjusted only, SES sample*† | Age-, sex-, and SES-adjusted*† | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean difference (95% CI) | Mean difference (95% CI) | Mean difference (95% CI) | |
| 6,077 | 4,601 | 4,601 | |
| Age in months | −0.17 (−0.19 to −0.16) | −0.17 (−0.19 to −0.15) | −0.17 (−0.19 to −0.15) |
| Female sex | 0.33 (0.25–0.41) | 0.34 (0.25–0.43) | 0.34 (0.25–0.43) |
| Distance to clinic, per kilometer | −0.01 (−0.03 to 0.006) | −0.02 (−0.04 to 0.007) | −0.01 (−0.04 to 0.008) |
| Latrine type | |||
| Improved | Ref | ||
| Unimproved | N/A | N/A | −0.27 (−0.46 to −0.09) |
| None | −0.26 (−0.48 to −0.05) | ||
| Dug well use for water vs. borehole | N/A | N/A | −0.07 (−0.23 to 0.09) |
| Radio ownership | N/A | N/A | 0.05 (−0.06 to 0.15) |
| Mobile ownership | N/A | N/A | 0.10 (−0.02 to 0.22) |
SES = socioeconomic status; N/A = not applicable.
Linear regression model with standard errors adjusted for clustering within communities.
Socioeconomic status was measured in a subgroup of communities (“SES sample”; N = 177) and these models are restricted only to the subpopulation with socioeconomic status measurements (N = 4,601).
Figure 3.Weight-for-age Z-score by distance from the child’s household and the primary healthcare facility serving the child’s visit. Light-shaded boxes indicate results for male and dark-shaded boxes for females.
Sex-stratified associations between weight-for-age Z-scores and sociodemographic characteristics
| Males | Females | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age- and sex-adjusted only* | Age- and sex-adjusted only, SES sample*† | Age-, sex-, and SES-adjusted*† | Age- and sex-adjusted only* | Age- and sex-adjusted only, SES sample*† | Age-, sex-, and SES-adjusted*† | |
| Mean difference (95% CI) | Mean difference (95% CI) | Mean difference (95% CI) | Mean difference (95% CI) | Mean difference (95% CI) | Mean difference (95% CI) | |
| 3,137 | 2,401 | 2,401 | 2,940 | 2,200 | 2,200 | |
| Age, per month | −0.18 (−0.20 to −0.16) | −0.18 (−0.20 to −0.15) | −0.18 (−0.20 to −0.15) | −0.16 (−0.18 to −0.14) | −0.16 (−0.19 to −0.14) | −0.16 (−0.19 to −0.14) |
| Distance to clinic, per kilometer | −0.006 (−0.03 to 0.02) | −0.01 (−0.04 to 0.02) | −0.007 (−0.04 to 0.02) | −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.002) | −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.006) | −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.006) |
| Latrine type | ||||||
| Improved | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Unimproved | N/A | N/A | −0.37 (−0.65 to −0.09) | N/A | N/A | −0.17 (−0.44 to 0.10) |
| None | −0.30 (−0.60 to 0.008) | −0.24 (−0.52 to 0.05) | ||||
| Dug well use for water vs. borehole | N/A | N/A | −0.14 (−0.36 to 0.07) | N/A | N/A | 0.0009 (−0.20 to 0.20) |
| Radio ownership | N/A | N/A | 0.01 (−0.13 to 0.16) | N/A | N/A | 0.09 (−0.05 to 0.22) |
| Mobile ownership | N/A | N/A | 0.19 (0.02 to 0.36) | N/A | N/A | 0.01 (−0.15 to 0.17) |
SES = socioeconomic status; N/A = not applicable.
Linear regression model with standard errors adjusted for clustering within communities.
In the subpopulation with socioeconomic status measurements (N = 4,601).