| Literature DB >> 34694730 |
Abstract
Nanoparticles possess some unique properties which improve their biochemical reactivity. Plants, due to their stationary nature, are constantly exposed to nanoparticles present in the environment, which act as abiotic stress agents at sub-toxic concentrations and phytotoxic agents at higher concentrations. In general, nanoparticles exert their toxicological effect by the generation of reactive oxygen species to which plants respond by activating both enzymatic and non-enzymatic anti-oxidant defence mechanisms. One important manifestation of the defence response is the increased or de novo biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, many of which have commercial application. The present review extensively summarizes current knowledge about the application of different metallic, non-metallic and carbon-based nanoparticles as elicitors of economically important secondary metabolites in different plants, both in vivo and in vitro. Elicitation of secondary metabolites with nanoparticles in plant cultures, including hairy root cultures, is discussed. Another emergent technology is the ligand-harvesting of secondary metabolites using surface-functionalized nanoparticles, which is also mentioned. A brief explanation of the mechanism of action of nanoparticles on plant secondary metabolism is included. Optimum conditions and parameters to be evaluated and standardized for the successful commercial exploitation of this technology are also mentioned.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34694730 PMCID: PMC8675826 DOI: 10.1049/nbt2.12005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IET Nanobiotechnol ISSN: 1751-8741 Impact factor: 2.050
FIGURE 1Schematic representation of the elicitation of secondary metabolites by currently known nanoparticles in plants
Elicitation of secondary metabolites by nanoparticles in plants in vivo
| NP | Size of NPs (nm) | Effective concentration of NPs | Plant species | Mode of application | Effect on secondary metabolism and antioxidant capacity | Effect on ROS, antioxidant and other enzyme activities | Effect on antioxidant and secondary metabolic genes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Metal‐based | ||||||||
| Ag | 2–50 | 10 ppm |
| Hydroponic | Increase in total phenolics | Increased CAT, POD | _ | 29 |
| Ag | ∼32 | 60–100 ppm |
| Increase in the major compounds of essential oils such as α‐terpinyl acetate at 60 ppm; thymol content was more than twice of carvacrol at all employed concentrations except 100 ppm | _ | _ | 30 | |
| Ag | ∼35 | 0.6 mM |
| Foliar | Increase the phenol, tannin and alkaloid contents | _ | _ | 31 |
| Ag | 30–50 | 0.4 mM |
| Hydroponic | 117% increase in saponin content but decrease in anthocyanin and flavonoid contents | _ | _ | 32 |
| Ag | 30–50 | 1 mM |
| Hydroponic | ∼230% increase in essential oil content; increase in flavonoids as well as antibacterial isoprenoids, namely camphor, allo‐ocimene, germacrene, | Increase in lipid peroxidation but decrease in radical scavenging activity | _ | 33 |
| Ag | 5–20 | 40–80 mg L−1 |
| Foliar | Increased essential oil content; among the 26 components of the essential oil, the maximum citronellol and geraniol content was found at 40 mg L−1, while linalool and citronellyl butyrate content decreased steadily with increasing AgNP levels until 40 mg L−1 and increased rapidly thereafter; maximum citronellol/geraniol ratio was obtained at 80 mg L−1 | _ | _ | 34 |
| Ag | 1–20 | 5–10 mg L−1 |
| Foliar | Increase in secondary metabolism, e.g. anthocyanin | Increase in ROS: H2O2 and MDA | Induction of secondary metabolism genes, e.g. glucosinolates, anthocyanin | 35 |
| Ag | 250–500 mg L−1 |
| Foliar | Increase in secondary metabolism, namely anthocyanin | Increase in ROS: H2O2 and MDA | Induction of genes of glucosinolates and anthocyanin | 36 | |
| Ag | 8–21 | 0.2 μg ml−1 |
| Soil | Enhanced diosgenin synthesis | _ | _ | 37 |
| Ag | ∼25 | 40 mM |
| Foliar | Enhancement of glycosides stevioside and rebaudioside A | _ | _ | 38 |
| Ag | ∼21.64 | 30 ppm |
| Foliar | Enhancement of total phenolics and flavonoids; enhancement of antioxidant capacity | _ | _ | 39 |
| Ag | 4 or 40 mg/plant |
| Foliar | Increase in phenolics. Enhancement of antioxidant capacity | _ | _ | 40 | |
| Ag | 200 ppm |
| Foliar | Enhanced carnosic acid content (>11%) along with that of total flavonoids | _ | _ | 41 | |
| CuO | 15–32 | 30 μg ml−1 |
| Media | Enhancement of total phenolic and flavonoid contents as well as antioxidant capacity | _ | _ | 42 |
| ZnO | 8–32 | |||||||
| Cu | 1.0 g L−1 |
| Foliar | Increase in essential oil percentage by 20%. Increase in menthol (15%), menthone (25%) and menthofuran (65%) content in the essential oil | _ | _ | 43 | |
| CuO | 1 ppm |
| Enhancement of polyphenol, flavonoid and tannin content along with antioxidant capacity | _ | _ | 44 | ||
| CuO | 1 ppm |
| Enhancement of polyphenol, flavonoid and tannin content along with antioxidant capacity | _ | _ | 45 | ||
| Cu(OH)2 | ∼40 | 10–20 mg L−1 |
| Hydroponic | Increase in ascorbic acid, phenolics as well as amino acids while decreasing citric acid | _ | _ | 46 |
| Au | 40 | 3 μg ml−1 |
| Medium | Enhanced total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity. While TPC and TFC were enhanced more by AgNP treatment, AuNPs showed greater enhancement of radical scavenging capacity | Increased SOD activity and total protein content | _ | 47 |
| Ag | 34 | |||||||
| Cu | 26 | |||||||
| CuO | 50 | 250 mg L−1 |
| Foliar | Increased vitamin C, lycopene, total phenols and flavonoids in the fruits and enhanced antioxidant capacity. | Increase in antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD. | _ | 48,49 |
| Under salt stress, enriched phenols (16%) in the leaves and the content of vitamin C (80%), glutathione (GSH) (81%) and phenols (7.8%) in the fruit | Under salt stress increased activities of PAL (104%), APX (140%), GPX (26%) SOD (8%) and CAT (93%) in the leaf tissue | |||||||
| Cu2O/Cu | 2–20 | 20–40 mg L−1 |
| Hydroponic | Hormetic increase in the contents of saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids as well as antioxidant capacity from 5 mg L−1 to a maximum at 40 mg L−1, and of phenolics at 20 mg L−1, decreasing thereafter | Increase in ROS markers H2O2, MDA; hormetic effect on activities of PAL, SOD, CAT and APX | _ | 51 |
| Cu | ∼50 | 50 mg L−1 + |
| Foliar | Increase in vitamin C, glutathione, phenol and flavonoid content in fruits, along with decrease in the severity of early blight disease caused by the fungus | Induction of the activity of SOD, APX, GPX and PAL in the leaves, and GPX in the fruit | _ | 52 |
| Se | 2–20 | 20 mg L−1 jointly | ||||||
| CuO | <50 | 1 and 10 μM |
| Medium | Enhancement of glycyrrhizin, total phenolic compounds, flavonoids, anthocyanins and proline content | _ | _ | 53 |
| ZnO | 1 and 10 μM | |||||||
| CuO | 25–55 | 100, 250, 500 mg L−1 separately |
| Sterile filter paper | Enhancement of anthocyanin, flavonoids and phenolics in a concentration‐dependent manner, the effect of NiO NPs being the most pronounced | _ | _ | 54 |
| NiO | 10–20 | |||||||
| ZnO | 18 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fe‐O + | 20 | 30 ppb + 20 GY |
| Foliar spray | Increase in contents secondary metabolites like essential oils, phenolics and flavonoids | _ | _ | 55 |
| CdO | 7–60 | 2.03 ± 0.45 × 105 particles cm−3 |
| Foliar | Enhanced ferulic acid and isovitexin content | _ | _ | 56 |
| TiO2 | 10–15 | 100–200 mg L−1 |
| Foliar | Enhanced secondary metabolites such as phenolics, flavonoids and essential oils. Among the major constituents of essential oils, the maximum increase of cis‐Thujene (34.5 %) and 1,8‐cineol (21.2 %) were achieved in plants exposed to 200 mg L−1 TiO2 NPs, while the maximal content of camphene (12.1 %) was obtained from plants exposed to 1000 mg L−1 nano‐TiO2 treatment | _ | _ | 57 |
| TiO2 | 10–25 | 10 ppm |
| Foliar spray | Under normal irrigation increased plant shoot dry mass and essential oils content; under drought stress, increased content of essential oils and some valuable phenolics like rosmarinic acid and chlorogenic acid | Under water‐deficit condition, decreased H2O2 and MDA content, indicating amelioration of water deficit stress | _ | 58,59 |
| TiO2 | 100, 250 and 500 mg L−1 |
| Hydroponic | Enhanced secondary metabolite as well as amino acid and fatty acid content | _ | _ | 60 | |
| TiO2 | <21 | 100 mg L−1 and 150 mg L−1 |
| Foliar spray | Enhanced essential oil content by 39.4% and 105.1%, respectively, over control, simultaneously increasing content and yield of menthol in the essential oil by 9.6% and 124.1% | _ | _ | 61 |
| TiO2 | ∼14 | 90 mg L−1 |
| Foliar | Increased the content and yield of essential oil by 23.6% and 55.1%, respectively. The content and yield of khusimol, the main ingredient of the essential oil was found to be enhanced by 24.5% and 93.2%, respectively | _ | _ | 62 |
| TiO2 | 50 and 100 mg L−1 |
| Foliar spray | Enhanced thymoquinone synthesis | _ | Stimulated the expression of the | 63 | |
| SiO2 | ||||||||
| TiO2 | ∼25 | 25 mM |
| Soil | Enhanced parthenolide synthesis | _ | SiO2 NP: Upregulated the expression of the genes related to parthenolide synthesis, | 64 |
| SiO2 | 10–15 | |||||||
| ZnO | 12–24 | 100 ppm |
| Synthetic matrix | Accumulation of phenolics, flavonoids and tannins while enhancing the anti‐oxidant capacity of the seedlings while enhancing seed germination | _ | _ | 65 |
| Zn | 30–70 | 5, 15 and 25 mg L−1 |
| Foliar | Increased total flavonoid content while decreasing total phenolic content | Increased SOD and antioxidant enzymes | 66 | |
| ZnO | ∼5–12 | 60 ppm |
| Foliar with chicken manure in soil | Enhanced the concentration of anthocyanins, phenols, tannins, flavonoids as well as crude protein and carbohydrates contents in roots | 67 | ||
| FeO | ∼2–6 | 50 ppm | ||||||
| Bimetallic nano‐alloys of Au, Ag and Cu | 18–48 | 30 μg ml−1 |
| Medium | Enhanced phenolics and flavonoids along with anti‐oxidant capacity. The effect of Cu in the NPs was more pronounced than that of Au and Ag. Smaller NPs caused more toxic stress | _ | _ | 68 |
| Zn‐Ag | 25–40 | 20 mg L−1 |
| Foliar | Enhanced withanolide synthesis | Both effects correlated well with activity of antioxidant enzymes as well as rates of transpiration, photosynthesis, Calvin cycle and carbohydrate metabolism | 69 | |
| Nanoalloy (19:1,13:1) | Negative effect on withanolide synthesis | |||||||
| Zn‐Ag NPs (9:1, 1:1), Cd‐Se Quantum dots, Ni NPs | ||||||||
| b. Non‐metal oxide NPs | ||||||||
| SiO2 | 50 and 100 mg L−1 |
| Foliar spray | Increased essential oil content while enriching the menthol content but decreasing menthone and menthyl acetate in the essential oil | _ | _ | 70 | |
| c. Carbon‐based NPs | ||||||||
| Chitosan | 90 ± 5 | 0.001% (w/v) |
| Foliar | Increase in phenolics, particularly flavonoids | Increased activity of defence enzymes POD, PPO, PAL, | Upregulation of the genes of PPO, | 20 |
Abbreviations: APX, ascorbate peroxidase; CAT, catalase; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; NP, nanoparticle; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; POD, peroxidase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
FIGURE 2Schematic representation of biosynthesis of secondary metabolites by currently known nanoparticles in plant tissue cultures
Elicitation of secondary metabolites by nanoparticles in plants in culture
| NP | Size of NPs (nm) | Effective concentration of NPs | Plant species | Type of culture | Effect on secondary metabolism and antioxidant capacity | Effect on ROS, antioxidant and other enzyme activities | Effect on antioxidant and secondary metabolic genes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Metal‐based | ||||||||
| Ag | 1.2 mg L−1 |
| Callus | Enhanced essential oil content with increase in all components | Increased lipid peroxidation | _ | 72 | |
| Ag | 0.625 mg ml−1 |
| Suspension | Enhanced aloin content after 48 h of exposure which gradually declined thereafter | _ | _ | 73 | |
| TiO2 | 120 mg L−1 | |||||||
| Ag |
| Callus | Increase in capsaicin content compared with fruits of C. annuum and C. frutescens | _ | _ | 74 | ||
| Ag | 5 and 10 ppm |
| Cell suspension | Production of anticancer compounds taxanes, taxol and baccatin III along with total soluble phenols, was enhanced about two‐fold at 5 ppm but declined at 10 ppm concentration | _ | _ | 75 | |
| Ag | 35 ± 15 | 25 and 50 mg L−1 |
| Micropropagation | Hormetic effect on total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity with increase at 25 and 50 mg L−1 but decrease at 100 mg L−1 | _ | _ | 76 |
| Ag | 1–20 | 5 mg L−1 |
| Cell suspension | Enhanced total phenolic and flavonoid contents; increase in the contents of flavonols hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids | _ | _ | 77 |
| Ag | 45 mg L−1 |
| Callus | Enhanced stevioside production. | _ | _ | 78 | |
| Ag | 40 | 90 μg L−1 |
| Callus | With growth regulators, enhanced production of phenolics (TPC: 3.0 mg), flavonoids (TFC: 1.8 mg) and antioxidant activity (90%), respectively | With growth regulators enhanced activities of PAL (5.8 U/mg); without growth regulators enhanced activities of antioxidant enzymes SOD, POD, CAT and APX. | _ | 79 |
| Ag | 30 μg L−1 each alone or in combination in different proportions |
| Callus | In presence of NAA (2 mg L−1) enhanced secondary metabolite production. The Ag‐Au NPs (1:3) induced maximum production of phenolics and flavonoids; Ag‐Au NPs (3:1) without NAA enhanced antioxidant activity (87.85%) | AgAu (1:3) and AuNPs alone enhanced SOD and POD enzymes to the maximum extent | _ | 80 | |
| Au | ||||||||
| Ag | 27.5 ± 4.8 | 10 and 50 mg dm−3 |
| Micropropagation | Altered the essential oil composition. There was a decrease in lower molecular weight compounds (e.g. α‐pinene and β‐pinene, camphene, δ‐3‐carene, p‐cymene, 1, 8‐cineole, trans‐pinocarveol and camphoriborneol), which were substituted by higher molecular weight compounds [τ‐cadinol 9‐cedranone and α‐cadinol 9‐cedranone, cadalene, α‐bisabolol, cis‐14‐nor‐muurol‐5‐en‐4‐one, (E,E)‐farnesol] | _ | _ | 81 |
| Au | 24.2 ± 2.4 | |||||||
| Cu | ∼1–2.7 | 0.5 mg L−1 |
| Clonal micropropagation | Increased essential oil content by 2.226% and 2.19%, respectively | _ | _ | 82 |
| Co | ∼1.3–3 | 0.8 mg L−1 | ||||||
| CuO | ∼47 | 10 mg L−1 |
| Micropropagation | Increase in major steviol glycosides (rebaudioside A and stevioside) accompanied by an increase in total phenolic and flavonoid contents as well as antioxidant activity | _ | _ | 83 |
| CuO | 50, 100 and 150 mg L−1 |
| Callus | Enhance phenolic content | Enhanced MDA content and activities of antioxidant defence enzymes POD, PPO and of PAL | 84 | ||
| CuO | 25–55 | 3 mg L−1 |
| Cell suspension | Induced a nine‐fold increase in the production of gymnemic acid II and phenolic compounds compared with control | _ | _ | 85 |
| Al2O3 | ∼100–500 | 10–100 μg ml−1 |
| BY‐2 cell suspension | Increase in the phenolic content in a dose‐dependent and time‐dependent manner | _ | _ | 86 |
| Co | 10 | 5 mg L−1 |
| Cell suspension | Enhanced artemisinin production (2.25‐fold) after 24 h | _ | Downregulation of the expression of two artemisinin biosynthesis genes | 87 |
| Mn2O3 | 25 mg L−1 |
| Shoot tip | Enhanced phenolics, flavonoids and alkaloids in a dose‐dependent manner. Enhanced free radical scavenging activity | Activated antioxidant defence enzymes SOD, POD, CAT and APX | _ | 88 | |
| Micropropagation | ||||||||
| Fe2O3 + static magnetic field | 100 ppm + 30 mT |
| Cell suspension | Enhanced the contents of total phenolics, flavonoids, anthocyanins and lignin. There was an increase in the content and liberation rate of medicinal compounds such as rosmarinic acid, naringin, apigenin, thymol, carvacrol, quercetin and rutin | Increase in MDA and the activities of the enzymes PPO and PAL | _ | 89 | |
| TiO2 | 4.5 and 6.0 mg L−1 |
| Callus | Increased the content of gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, o‐coumaric acid, tannic acid and cinnamic acid | _ | _ | 90 | |
| Perlite | 14.51–23.34 | 25‐200 mg L−1 |
| Callus | Increase in the content, variety and number of volatile compounds as well as in the amounts of hypericin and pseudohypercin | _ | _ | 91 |
| TiO2‐perlite nanocomposites | 15.5–24.61 | |||||||
| ZnO, Fe2O3 | 100 ppb |
| Cell suspension | Increased the production of hypericin and hyperforin | _ | _ | 92 | |
| ZnO | 75 mg L−1 |
| Micropropagation | Hormetic effect with maximum content of phenolics and flavonoids concentrations of 75 and 25 mg L−1, respectively | _ | _ | 93 | |
| 25 mg L−1 | ||||||||
| ZnO | <100 | 500–1500 mg L−1 |
| Callus with organogenesis | Increased phenolic and flavonoid production in a concentration‐dependent manner while enhancing antioxidant and reducing capacity | _ | _ | 94 |
| ZnO | 34 | 1 mg L−1 |
| Shoot micropropagation | Enhanced production of steviol glycosides (rebaudioside A and stevioside) as well as total phenolic and flavonoid contents along with antioxidant capacity, but the effect declined at higher concentration | _ | _ | 95 |
| ZnO | 24 | 1 ppm |
| Cell suspension | Two‐fold increase in the content of the saponin bacoside A while it was suggested that ZnO NPs possibly have an effect on the isoprenoid pathway of biosynthesisIt was suggested that ZnO NPs possibly have an effect on the isoprenoid pathway of biosynthesis | _ | Downregulation of the expression of the | 96 |
| ZnO | <35 | 100 mg L−1 |
| Cell suspension | Repeated elicitation enhanced the production of lignans in 15 days, and of phenolics, flavonoids and neolignans at 25 days | _ | _ | 97 |
| ZnO | 34 | 150 mg L−1 |
| Callus | Enhanced thymol and carvacrol production. The highest increases for thymol and carvacrol were achieved with 150 mg L−1 in T. | _ | _ | 98 |
| Au‐Cu nanoalloy | 30 μg L−1 |
| Submerged adventitious root | Stimulated biomass production and enhanced the total content of phenolics and flavonoids as well as antioxidant capacity. Maximum effect was seen with AuCu (1:3) NPs | _ | _ | 99 | |
| b. Carbon‐based nanoparticles | ||||||||
| Chitosan | ∼200–500 | 1 mg L−1 |
| Micropropagation | Enhanced the contents of soluble phenols, proline and alkaloid while amplifying organogenesis | Enhancement in the activities of the enzymes POD, CAT and PAL | _ | 100 |
| Multi‐walled carbon nanotubes | Diameter 5–15 | 25 and 50 μg L−1 |
| Callus | Enhanced the content of phenolics, flavonoids, rosmarinic acid and caffeic acid | Enhanced the activity of oxidative enzymes PPO, POD and PAL | _ | 101 |
| Multi‐walled carbon nanotubes | 50–150 mg L−1 |
|
| Enhanced alkaloid and phenol contents 1.7‐fold and 23%, respectively | Enhancement of activities of CAT, POD, and PAL | Upregulation of the deacetylvindoline‐4‐O‐acetyltransferase ( | 102 | |
| c. Elicitation in hairy root cultures | ||||||||
| Ag‐SiO2 core–shell NPs | 101.8 ± 8.9 | 900 mg L−1 |
| Hairy root | Enhanced artemisinin production from 1.67 to 2.86 mg g−1 dry weight compared with control | Increase in H2O2 generation, lipid peroxidation and CAT activity | _ | 103 |
| Ag | 50–60 | 2 mg ml−1 |
| Hairy root | Enhanced atropine production by 1.147‐fold, 1.117‐fold, and 2.42‐fold in comparison to the control samples after 12, 24, and 48 h of treatment, respectively | _ | _ | 104 |
| AgNP | 1–20 |
| Hairy root | Elevated levels of glucosinolates (glucoallysin, glucobrassicanapin, sinigrin, progoitrin, gluconapin, 4‐methoxygluco‐brassicin, 4‐hydroxyglucobrassicin, gluco‐brassicin, neoglucobrassicin and gluconasturtin) | Increase in H2O2 and MDA | Upregulation of the corresponding transcripts | 106 | |
| Increase in total phenolic and flavonoid contents and. This was accompanied by enrichment of the phenolic compounds (flavonols, hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids). | Upregulation of their gene expression | |||||||
| Increased free radical scavenging activity. | ||||||||
| CuO | 100 mg L−1 |
| Hairy root | Enhanced contents of glucosinolates (gluconasturtin, glucobrassicin, 4‐methoxyglucobrassicin, neoglucobrassicin, 4‐hydroxyglucobrassicin, glucoallysin, glucobrassicanapin, sinigrin, progoitrin and gluconapin) | _ | Upregulation of the corresponding transcript | 107 | |
| Increase in total phenolic and flavonoid contents and. This was accompanied by enrichment of the phenolic compounds (flavonols, hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids) | Upregulation of their gene expression | |||||||
| Increased free radical scavenging activity | ||||||||
| SiO2 | 100 mg L−1 |
| Hairy root | About 8.26‐fold increase in the content of rosmarinic acid (RA) compared with control, after 48 h exposure time. Anticancer flavonoids including xanthomicrol, cirsimaritin and isokaempferide increased 13‐fold, 13.42‐fold and 10‐fold, respectively, compared with the control | _ | Upregulation in the phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase ( | 108 | |
| Fe‐O | 75 mg L−1 |
| Hairy root | 9.7‐fold, 11.87‐fold, 3.85‐fold and 2.27‐fold enhancement in the contents of rosmarinic acid, xanthomicrol, cirsimaritin and isokaempferide, respectively, compared with control after 24 h exposure | Enhanced APX, CAT and SOD activities | Upregulation of | 109 | |
Abbreviations: APX, ascorbate peroxidase; CAT, catalase; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; NP, nanoparticle; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; POD, peroxidase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
FIGURE 3Schematic diagram of ligand‐harvesting of secondary metabolites from intact plant cells by functionalized nanoparticles
FIGURE 4Schematic representation of the probable mechanism of modulation of plant secondary mechanism by nanoparticles