Peerzada Gh Jeelani1, C Ramalingam1. 1. Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences and Technology, Nano-Food Research Group, Instrumental and Food Analysis Laboratory, Division of Industrial Biotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu,, India.
Abstract
Biogenic silica synthesised from rice husk was used as a controlled release system of an eco-friendly biocide consisting of a Justicia adhatoda extract. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) indicated the presence of ester bonds between the silica support and the conjugated Justicia adhatoda extract. Surface area analysis and microscopy confirmed a high level of Justicia adhatoda extract loading in the silica support. The phytochemical investigation of Justicia adhatoda was done by Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) spectroscopy. Moreover, compared with the naked biogenic silica nanoparticles, a better thermal stability was determined for the conjugated system of the extracted compounds. Trial of kinetic release of silica: Justicia adhatoda ∼29% of loaded Justicia adhatoda was released within 1 h and then the rate of release became slow. Net release of Justicia adhatoda was observed up to 50% within 7 h. The Justicia adhatoda compounds released from silica also showed the improved mortality rate against stored product pest rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae).
Biogenic silica synthesised from rice husk was used as a controlled release system of an eco-friendly biocide consisting of a Justicia adhatoda extract. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) indicated the presence of ester bonds between the silica support and the conjugated Justicia adhatoda extract. Surface area analysis and microscopy confirmed a high level of Justicia adhatoda extract loading in the silica support. The phytochemical investigation of Justicia adhatoda was done by Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) spectroscopy. Moreover, compared with the naked biogenic silica nanoparticles, a better thermal stability was determined for the conjugated system of the extracted compounds. Trial of kinetic release of silica: Justicia adhatoda ∼29% of loaded Justicia adhatoda was released within 1 h and then the rate of release became slow. Net release of Justicia adhatoda was observed up to 50% within 7 h. The Justicia adhatoda compounds released from silica also showed the improved mortality rate against stored product pest rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae).
Wide range of biocides such as the azoles, carbamates, pyrethroids, cupric, aromatics and halogenated heterocycle compounds have been widely applied to decrease crop losses due to pests, and to improve the service life of stored grains. Justicia adhatoda L. (bashok) is a tall dense evergreen shrub belonging to the family Acanthaceae. Many scientific studies have indicated that J. adhatoda has antibacterial, antifungal, anti‐asthmatic, antihistaminic, anti‐inflammatory, anti‐ulcer, antioxidative, antitubercular, antitussive, larvicidal, anti‐Alzheimer and hepatoprotective effects [1]. Extracts from J. adhatoda
L. (Acanthaceae) strongly reduced the fitness of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti Linn. The methanolic extracts inhibited several enzymes responsible for protecting insects from oxidative and other damages, including glutathione‐S‐transferase, superoxide dismutase, cytochrome P450 and α‐ and β‐esterases. They increased repellency (maximum repellency at 100 ppm) in host‐seeking adult females regardless of high efficacy of these organic biocides (Justicia adhatoda) in containing pests and mites [2]. But, there is a concern related to their bioavailability and stability in different temperature regions [3].The rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae L. (Colepotera: Curculionidae) is a dominant pest of various food grains like rice, wheat and maize under storage [4]. Synthetic insecticides have been found effective against stored product pests but proved to be hazardous to environment as well as to humans and domestic animals. The over dependence and over usage of synthetic pesticides especially insecticides since last four decades led to wide spectrum of pests problem like pests resistance to chemicals, resurgence of pests, residues in food and soil and risks to human and animal health, besides environmental pollution [4]. The presence of unusually large numbers of insects in the stored grains remains the foremost challenge all over the world. No scrupulous nontoxic insecticide for the fortification of these insects exists in the market. Unremitting exposure to the toxic chemicals that are used as insecticides may cause several disorders. There are about 20,000 deaths in the third world countries annually according to World Health Organization (WHO) due to pesticide poisoning. Chemical fumigants and residual insecticides are predominantly used for fortification of stored grains against pest infestation [5]. Grievously, this spearheads to adulteration of food with toxic pesticide residues. The expansion of resistance in both field and stored insects to traditional insecticides coupled with greater consumer alertness of the repercussion of their residual toxicity, and environmental contamination has to steer agro‐chemical researchers to appraise the use of inert dust as a surrogate insecticide for crop fortification. Besides, voluminous stored‐product insects have become resistant to a range of chemical pesticides [6]. Sitophilus oryzae is a prevalent insect pest ravaging stored grains worldwide. Sitophilus oryzae vernacularly called as rice weevil is the utmost conventional pest found in stored rice, wheat, corn, buckwheat and oat. The nuisance of this pest leads to colossal damage in the quality as well as quantity of stored grains. Conventionally fumigants (methyl bromide and phosphine) and chemical treatment (organophosphates) are used to control this pest. However, this leads to the accumulation of the toxic residue of pesticide in the whole grains [7, 8]. Rice weevil (S. oryzae) fosters larvae inside the kernel and, consequently, is shielded from grain protectant residues on the peripheral of the kernel. S. oryzae is becoming resistant to phosphine and conventional insecticides such as pyrethroids [9, 10, 11]. The exploitation of nanoparticles as the pesticide is an unconventional approach to combat pests, which have become resistant to conventional pesticides. It is catalogued as a primary pest which insinuates that insects are competent of infesting whole grain kernels. Consumer perception of the global warming and consequences of residual toxicity and escalating resistance of insects to storage insecticides has preceded the researchers to evaluate alternative approaches for the waste management of crop residues and to protect stored grains [12]. Also, improved biocide efficiency is needed to increase the bioavailability and stability of bioactive compounds of the crude extract for enhanced life performance and avert excessive initial dosages or frequent applications.There have been several attempts to control the release rate of biocides by encapsulating them mainly in polymeric carriers. Biodegradable and synthetic polymers can be used as release rate controlling carrier materials of biocides; however, the polymeric carriers are expensive due their synthesis and precursors, and they are thermally, dimensionally and chemically unstable [13, 14]. Biogenic silica nanoparticles could be used as an attempt to design cheaper and cleaner controlled release systems compared to those prepared with polymeric and synthetic silica as carrier material. Economical and renewable silica nanostructures can be obtained from biorefinery platforms of silica‐accumulating plants, Rice husk is rich in silica content accounts during its combustion, about 20–25 wt% of rice husk ash (RHA), containing more than 90% silica [15, 16]. The Sol–gel method is a common route in the synthesis of silica nanoparticles due to its ability to form high purity and homogenous products at proper conditions. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) is generally used as a precursor in alkaline medium to produce silica nanoparticles. Sodium silicate is another alternative precursor for synthesis of silica nanoparticles. Sodium silicate bids characteristic advantages over TEOS including refined and uniform particle size along with the high concentration of silica nanoparticles. Many agricultural wastes have been used to extract sodium silicate such as sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA), rice husk , groundnut shell, banana peel, coconut husk, orange peel and walnut shell as an economical and non‐ metallic bio‐precursor for biogenic nano‐silica synthesis [17, 18].Silica nanoparticles have also been immensely explored due to their interesting properties such as hydrophilic surface favouring protracted circulation, versatile silane chemistry for surface functionalisation, excellent biocompatibility, ease of large scale synthesis and porosity [19].Gangwar et al. reported the conjugation of curcumin with silica nanoparticles for controlled kinetic release which increases the bioavailability of the curcumin molecule by also keeping its therapeutic activity intact [20]. Manju et al. have also reported synthesis of water‐soluble gold nanoparticles in curcumin−polymer conjugate and studied it for blood compatibility and targeted drug delivery onto cancer cells [21]. Mattos et al. reported a green and non‐bio‐accumulating slow release biocide system consists of silica nanoparticles loaded with neem extract, which showed comprising results neem compounds released from silica showed a satisfactory scavenging activity over 50% of 2,2‐Diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical, and could cause the mortality of the majority of workers of Acromyrmex crassispinus, an ant species .The optimisation of biogenic silica nanoparticles synthesis luxuriating response surface methodology (RSM) has been testified in the surfactant‐free synthesis of high surface area silica nanoparticles derived from rice husks [22]. This approach has advantages of shaping the ideal reaction conditions illustrating the fewer experimental results than those needing prerequisite to feedback the consequence of inclusive input variables. The central composite design (CCD) method was used to regulate the number of experiments to be evaluated for the optimisation of the variables and responses. The minimum, intermediate and maximum values of each variable were labelled as −1, 0 and +1, respectively. In this paper, the authors report a neat protocol which outlines the conjugation of Justicia adhatoda with biogenic silica nanoparticles by using a simple wet chemical method. This protocol foresees good bioavailability of the Justicia adhatoda extract. Also, the study shows potential application of such a conjugate in the agricultural domain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Justicia adhatoda extract was used as an entomotoxic agent. The extraction was done by the traditional method of Soxhlet extraction with hexane solvent (high media). The phytochemical investigation was performed by Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) analyses of hexane extract of Justicia adhatoda using a Perkin Elmer GC‐MS (Model Perkin Elmer Clarus 600, USA) equipped with a VF‐5 MS fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d, film thickness 0.25 μm) (Figure 1). Biogenic nano‐silica were synthesised following a previously described extraction procedures [22, 23]. Rice husk was collected from the farms of Lalapet village, Vellore District. Rice husk was cleaned thoroughly to remove all remaining dirt and dust by boiling in the water on a hot plate with magnetic stirrer several times, then dried in a hot air oven. Dried rice husk was pre‐treated with different acids (1 N HCl, 1N HNO3, 1 N H2SO4) and kept in the water bath at 75°C for 30 min to remove ionic and other impurities further washed with distilled water 2–3 times and further kept in a hot air oven again for complete drying. The treated rice husk was incinerated in the muffle furnace at 600°C under atmospheric conditions for 4 h. For extraction of the silica, 1 g of prepared powdered ash was stirred with 100 ml of 1 N NaOH solution for 1 h at 60°C and filtered. The silica present in the ash combines with the sodium present in the NaOH solution and forms sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution. At room temperature, the pH of sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) filtrate was adjusted to pH 7.4 using 20% H2SO4. The reaction of sodium silicate with sulphuric acid forms a white silica precipitate solution.
FIGURE 1
Biogenic synthesis of nano silica from rice husk
Biogenic synthesis of nano silica from rice husk
Formation of sodium silicate solution from ash
The solution was kept under continuous stirring for 48 h. The stirred precipitate solution was sonicated for 10 min and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min and washed multiple times with ethanol to remove all the adulterations. The precipitate was then dried in a hot air oven at 80°C overnight. After complete drying, white powdered nano‐silica was formed. It was ground with mortar and pestle to get a fine powder. Sintering process was carried out by heating the synthesised nano‐silica in an electric furnace at 900°C under atmospheric conditions for 2 h (Figure 1).
Formation of silica dioxide from sodium silicate solution
Procedure for the synthesis of silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate, 50 mg of plant extract was added to sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution formed and continuously stirred, heated at 60°C for next 60 min. The final colour of the solution was dark green. After this, the reaction flask was placed in an oven at 40°C for 24 h to evaporate the solvent. Powder was collected and washed three times in deionised (DI) water. The colour of the powder was found to be green colour.Optimisation of biogenic silica nanoparticles synthesis using response surface methodology was used to study the effect of overall input variables and to obtain maximum production. The RSM using CCD was applied to augment the several factors namely rice husk concentration, calcination time and calcination temperature for enhancing the synthesis of silica nano‐powder. The quadratic model was utilised to probe the data. Each factor in the design was premeditated at five different levels (−1, +alpha, 0, +1, −alpha) and the minimum and maximum ranges of rice husk concentration, calcination time and calcination temperature variables were established as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Independent factors and its level used in response surface central composite design for synthesis of silica nanoparticles (response)
Factor
Name
Units
Low actual
High actual
Low coded
High coded
Mean
SD
A
Concentration of Rice husk
g
50.00
90.00
−1.000
1.000
70.00
16.527
B
Time
h
3.00
6.00
−1.000
1.000
4.500
1.240
C
Calcination temperature
°C
400
700.00
−1.000
1.000
550.000
123.951
Independent factors and its level used in response surface central composite design for synthesis of silica nanoparticles (response)A design with 20 experiments was framed, and trials were carried out in 200 ml alumina crucibles (high media) at maximum temperature of 1000–1500°C with different parameters of rice husk concentration, calcination time and calcination temperature. Synthesised biogenic nano‐silica was used as a response. The 3D interactions and contour plots were computed to appraise the augmented parameters, which influence the response. By using a second‐order polynomial equation, all the responses were analysed, and the data were fitted to the equation by multiple regression procedures. To validate the predicted value and the experimental value of the responses, an experiment was conducted in triplicates using the optimum values for variables given by response surface optimization. The experimental design results were analysed and interpreted using Design‐Expert version 7.0 statistical software (Stat‐Ease Inc.).Thermogravimetric experiments were performed in TG/DSC, with Ar atmosphere using 20 mL min−1 gas flow. Morphology of the silica nanoparticles, biocide system and extract. The surface morphology and elemental composition of the biocide system was measured by transmission electron microscope (Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)–FEI‐Tecnai G2 20 Twin) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV and scanning electron microscope (SEM) with EDAX (SEM‐EDAX) device EVO 18. The functional groups of the, silica nanoparticles, biocide system and extract were attained by utilising FTIR spectroscopy over the wavenumber range from 4000 to 400 cm−1. In vitro release kinetics of Justicia adhatoda from silica nanoparticles was studied using UV−vis spectroscopy and is shown in Figure 7. For this purpose, silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate was dispersed (2 mg/ml) in the phosphate buffer solution (PBS: 7.4 pH) and an experiment was performed at 35°C. The Malvern Mastersizer particle analyser was used to analyse the particle surface dimensions of the biogenic synthesised nano‐silica and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate.
FIGURE 7
TEM images of (A) silica nanoparticles and (B) Justicia adhatoda conjugate
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) profile of hexane leaf extract of Justicia adhatodaThe entomotoxicity bioassay on S. oryzae was conducted in multipurpose clinical sample collectors, which are small plastic screw‐capped jars purchased from Himedia. The caps were pierced to permit aeration. Each jar was filled with 5 g of rice (IR64). Insecticidal effects on treated grain. Bioassay was conducted by applying 1 mg of each sample (silica nanoparticles, conjugated silica nanoparticles, Justicia adhatoda extract onto 5 g of rice grains). The control was only treated with 1 ml of acetone. The treated grains were dried under the fume hood. Twenty Weight unsexed adults of S. oryzae are introduced into the respective petri dishes containing 5 g of treated rice. All treatments were monitored to obtain the mean percentage of mortality after 72 h. Experiments were replicated for four times.The tested insects were respectively subjected to acetylcholinesterase biochemical assay (AChE). Each insect was removed and homogenised at 0°C in 0.05 M‐phosphate buffer, pH 7.5 (KH2PO4‐NaOH) (Sigma) using a glass homogeniser pestle (5%, w/v, homogenate). Plastic tube covered with ice was used to keep the homogenised mixture. The homogenates were centrifuged at 16,000 rpm for 20 min (5°C). These supernatants were kept in the ice and used without further purification for studying the acetylcholinesterase and its inhibition. To determine the AChE inhibition activity, procedure from Arshia Hematpoor et al., 2017 [24] is used. 10 μl of enzyme supernatants were transferred to each well of a 96‐well microtiter plate using electronic multichannel pipette (High Media), then mixed with 20 μl of tested compounds in solution form and 150 μl of phosphate buffer which were kept at 1–4°C temperature were added. Biogenic nano‐silica, silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate and Justicia adhatoda plant extract were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma) as AChE inhibitor and 0.1% DMSO (v/v) was added into test well in separated rows. The microtiter plates were incubated for 10 min at 25°C. Then, 20 μl of acetylthiocholine iodide (ACTHI) (Sigma‐Aldrich ) (0.4 mM) and DTNB (Sigma‐Aldrich) (0.3 mM) were added to enzyme supernatants solution to observe the reaction. During the 30 min reaction at room temperature, yellowish or colourless solution was observed. The microtiter plates were analysed for microplate readers at 412 nm and results were recorded. Percentage of inhibition calculated based on the mean optical density of enzyme as stated in Equation [1]:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The GC‐MS analysis revealed the presence of 13 compounds from the hexane leaf extract of J. adhatoda (Figure 2). The major constituents were hexadecanoic acid, methyl ether (RT: 13.55) n‐hexadecanoic acid (RT: 16.88). phytol (RT: 17.81) along with other minor constituents were also present (Table 2).
FIGURE 2
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) profile of hexane leaf extract of Justicia adhatoda
TABLE 2
Phytocomponents identified in the hexane leaf extracts of J. adhatoda
RT
Compound name
Molecular formula
Area (%)
.566
3‐Pentanol
C5H12O88
0.14
13.55
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ether
C17H34O2
16.88
16.88
n‐Hexadecanoic acid
C17H34O2
10.13
17.81
Phytol
C20H40O
24.90
23.70
Dotriacontane
C32H66
5.6
24.44
2,6,6‐Trimethyl‐2‐cyclohexene‐1,4‐dione
C9H12O2
5.03
27.57
4‐Pentadecanone
C15H30O
1.80
27.26`
Stigmasterol
C29H48O
1.91
28.26
Triisobutyl phosphate
C12H27O4P
6.08
29.69
1 4,5‐Dipropenyldihydro‐furan‐2‐one 166
C10H14O2
0.87
Statistical optimisation of parameters for response: Synthesis of nano‐silica (mg) using central composite design. 3‐D and contour response plots representing the interactions between different variables and its effect on synthesis of silica Nps. (a) interaction between rice husk concentration versus calcination time (AB), (b) interaction between calcination time versus calcination temperature (BC) and (c) interaction between calcination temperature versus rice husk concentration (CA)Phytocomponents identified in the hexane leaf extracts of J. adhatodaWaste materials from agricultural sources are an exceptionally good bio‐resource for several products, such as bioethanol, animal feed, cellulose, bio‐char and biogenic silica. Groundnut shell, banana peel, coconut husk, orange peel and walnut shell are agro‐wastes that are largely constituted of hemicellulose, cellulose, silica, lignin, and trace amount metal ions. Hitherto, many agro‐wastes such as rice husk, bamboo leaves waste, sugar beet bagasse etc. have been used for the biogenic synthesis of nano‐silica [25, 27]. Here, the authors selected rice husk as a source of agro‐waste for the biogenic synthesis of nano‐silica. Rice husk was pre‐treated with different acids (1 N HCl, 1 N HNO3, 1 N H2SO4) and kept in the water bath at 75°C for 30 min to remove ionic and other impurities. The acid pre‐treatment removed metal ion impurities and partially hydrolysed the organic substances of these agro‐wastes. The incineration process of the agro‐waste after the acid pre‐treatment removed organic substances and produced nano‐silica with excessive purity and amorphous morphology. This is the simple method and can be appropriate for the large scale production of pure biogenic nano‐silica.A statistical tool response surface methodology through CCD using five‐level three variables with six central points was used for improving the synthesis of nano‐silica. Maximum synthesis of nano‐silica was found to be 2.5 ± 0.10 (mg) at central values of all the factors, namely rice husk concentration (50 g), calcination time (6 h) and calcination temperature (700°C). The Model F‐value of 152.63 implies that the model is significant. There is only a 0.01% chance that a ‘Model F‐Value' of this large could occur due to noise. In this case A, B and C are significant model terms. The ‘Lack of Fit F‐value' of 1.22 implies the Lack of Fit is not significant relative to the pure error. There is a 44.03% chance that a ‘Lack of Fit F‐value' of this large could occur due to noise. The projected R
2 of 0.9662 is in rational conformity with the adjusted R
2 of 0.9599, that is, the variance is less than 0.033, which implied that the model is significant. The passable precision of 39.697 with a coefficient of variation of 6.47 % endorsed that the model is exceedingly significant and the experiments are accurate, reliable, and the model can be used to pilot the design space. (Table 3) The polynomial equation of second order for the response can be written as
where R1 was symbolising synthesis of nano‐silica (mg) as response and A, B and C were coded terms for the three test variables, namely rice husk concentration, calcination time and calcination temperature, respectively. The 3D interactions between the variables showed a significant influence on the response either independently or in interaction with each other (Figure 3). The model was validated by conducting the synthesis experiment under optimum conditions of all the three variables A, B and C to check the accuracy of the optimisation. The experimental nano‐silica synthesis amount was found to be 1.582 ± 0.08 (mg), which was in a favourable concurrence with the prognosticate result 1.97 ± 0.8 (mg) demonstrating the validity of the model as shown in (Table 4). Hence the ideal point prognostication resolved by CCD was efficaciously substantiated, and it was established that it can be used to augment the synthesis parameters of silica. The conventional plot for residuals and predicted versus actual plots were represented respectively (Figure 4). Thus, a significant increase from 0.6 to 2.5 mg in the synthesis of nano‐silica were observed under optimised parameters of rice husk 50 g calcination time (6 h) and calcination temperature of (700°C).
TABLE 3
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model (response: synthesis of biogenic nano‐silica (mg))
Source
Sum of squares
Df
Mean square
F‐Value
p‐Value
Model
4.91
3
1.64
152.63
< 0.0001
Significant
A‐rice husk concentration (g)
0.15
1
0.15
14.18
0.0017
B‐time (h)
1.34
1
1.34
125.26
< 0.0001
C‐calcination temperature (°C)
3.41
1
3.41
318.45
< 0.0001
Residual
0.71
16
0.011
Lack of fit
0.12
11
0.011
1.22
0.4403
Not significant
Pure error
0.047
5
9.320E−003
Cor Total
4.31
19
Standard deviation
0.0873
Mean
1.60
CV%
6.47
R2
0.9662
Adjusted R2
0.9599
Predicted R2
0.9448
Adequate precision
39.697
FIGURE 3
Statistical optimisation of parameters for response: Synthesis of nano‐silica (mg) using central composite design. 3‐D and contour response plots representing the interactions between different variables and its effect on synthesis of silica Nps. (a) interaction between rice husk concentration versus calcination time (AB), (b) interaction between calcination time versus calcination temperature (BC) and (c) interaction between calcination temperature versus rice husk concentration (CA)
TABLE 4
Actual versus predicted value for response: synthesis of biogenic nano‐silica (mg)
Std
Run
Factor 1
Factor 2
Factor 3
Response (R1)
A: rice husk concentration (g)
B: Time
C: calcination temperature (°C)
Synthesis of nano‐silica
9
1
38.36
4.50
550.00
1.9
14
2
70.00
4.50
802.27
2.4
2
3
90.00
3.00
400.00
0.7
13
4
70.00
4.50
297.73
0.6
19
5
70.00
4.50
550.00
1.67
17
6
70.00
4.50
550.00
1.56
8
7
90.00
6.00
700.00
2.4
12
8
70.00
7.02
550.00
2
18
9
70.00
4.50
550.00
1.5
20
10
70.00
4.50
550.00
1.45
7
11
50.00
6.00
700.00
2.5
15
12
70.00
4.50
550.00
1.7
10
13
103.64
4.50
550.00
1.4
1
14
50.00
3.00
400.00
1
5
15
50.00
3.00
700.00
1.9
6
16
90.00
3.00
706.00
1.7
4
17
90.00
6.00
400.00
1.5
5
18
50.00
6.00
400.00
1.5
11
19
70.00
1.08
550.00
1
16
20
70.00
4.50
550.00
1.6
FIGURE 4
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model (response: synthesis of nano‐silica). (a) normal plot of residuals and (b) predicted versus actual plot
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model (response: synthesis of biogenic nano‐silica (mg))ANOVA for response surface quadratic model (response: synthesis of nano‐silica). (a) normal plot of residuals and (b) predicted versus actual plotActual versus predicted value for response: synthesis of biogenic nano‐silica (mg)XRD patterns of pristine silica: Justicia adhatoda (black), silica nanoparticles (red) and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate (blue)
Characterisation
Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns of silica nanoparticles, Justicia adhatoda and synthesised nano‐silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). Measurements were performed at a voltage of 40 kV and 40 mA within the 2θ range of 10–90°. The synthesised biogenic nano‐silica sample exhibited a broad peak at 2θ value of about 22°. The broadness of the exhibited peaks at 22° 2θ confirmed that the synthesised biogenic nano‐silica samples were amorphous in nature. The XRD pattern of Justicia adhatoda extract showed several characteristic peaks due to its crystalline nature. It can be observed from Figure 5 that Justicia adhatoda extract and conjugate retains characteristic peaks at 31°,35° and 39°, which further indicates that conjugate has retained its crystallinity after conjugation and however the intensity of the corresponding peaks has been reduced. Therefore, one can conclude that the Justicia adhatoda gets coated on the silica nanoparticles, which is also evident from the SEM and TEM data. Figures 6a,b and 7a,b show SEM and TEM images of synthesised silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate. It is observed from these figures that silica nanoparticles are spherical in shape, having diameter of 75 ± 5 nm. It can be seen from these figures that silica nanoparticles are completely surrounded by Justicia adhatoda as a shell. The Mastersizer particle analyser was used for the surface area, and pore size analysis of biogenic synthesised nano‐silica. Silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate has a larger surface area of 0.986 μm as compared to the biogenic silica nanoparticle with surface area 0.829 μm. The particle size distribution was observed for silica nanoparticle with 50%–90% and it ranged from 566.424 to 911.911 μm, respectively, of silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate (Table 5). Figure 8 shows FTIR spectra of (i) Justicia adhatoda (ii) silica nanoparticles and (iii) silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate. Here spectra (i) and (ii) exhibit the typical signatures of both silica nanoparticles and Justicia adhatoda. Presence of several absorption bands cm−1 indicated the presence of active functional groups at 1392 cm−1 (CN bond); 1739, 1684 cm−1 (stretching vibration of C=O); 2802–3113 cm−1 (stretching vibration of O–H group) (13*). In spectra (ii) these signatures may be recognised as asymmetric vibration of Si−O (1070.49 cm−1), asymmetric vibration of Si−OH (958.62 cm−1) and symmetric vibration of Si−O (796.60 cm−1) in silica nanoparticles. Spectrum (iii) illustrates the conjugation of Justicia adhatoda with silica nanoparticles. This spectrum reveals signatures of both silica nanoparticles and Justicia adhatoda molecules. The main phytoconstituents present in the Adhatoda plant are vasicine, vasicinone, vasicol, vasicinol, vasicinolone etc. [28]. A characteristic band of –NH and –OH groups of extract appeared 3192.19 cm−1. The observation of bands at 2566 and 2867 cm−1 are due to the aliphatic C–H stretching frequencies. The presence of carbonyl group and amine of the extract showed the stretching band at 1440 cm−1 .The IR band observed at 1020 cm−1 is ascribed to aromatic C–H group/heteroatom containing C–C group. The absorption bands appeared in the IR spectrum of extract could also be seen in the IR spectra of Justicia adhatoda conjugated silica nanoparticles [29].
FIGURE 5
XRD patterns of pristine silica: Justicia adhatoda (black), silica nanoparticles (red) and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate (blue)
FIGURE 6
SEM images of silica nanoparticles (A) and Justicia adhatoda conjugate (B)
TABLE 5
Mastersizer particle analysis of biogenic silica nanoparticles and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate
Sample
Specific surface Area m2/g
d(0.5): um
d(0.9): um
Biogenic silica nanoparticles
0.829 ± 0.9
566.424 ± 9.6
883.778 ± 1.7
Justicia adhatoda conjugate
0.986 ± 0.8
806.671 ± 2.9
911.911 ± 3.8
FIGURE 8
FTIR spectra of (i) Justicia adhatoda, (ii) silica nanoparticles and (iii) silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate
SEM images of silica nanoparticles (A) and Justicia adhatoda conjugate (B)TEM images of (A) silica nanoparticles and (B) Justicia adhatoda conjugateMastersizer particle analysis of biogenic silica nanoparticles and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugateFTIR spectra of (i) Justicia adhatoda, (ii) silica nanoparticles and (iii) silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugateThermal analysis of neat silica nanoparticles, Justicia adhatoda and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate was investigated using TGA as shown in Figure 9. It can be observed from this figure that neat silica nanoparticles (red curve) do not exhibit any significant weight loss up to 600°C, except for a small loss at 200−400°C due to the removal of absorbed water. The TGA curve for pure Justicia adhatoda (black curve) shows rapid weight loss in the range of 250−445°C, which may be attributed to the degradation of Justicia adhatoda. Synthesised silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate also begins to lose weight at 270–300°C with high rate, and afterward it becomes slower. The TGA results show that a ∼40% of lose weight at 270–300°C with high rate, and afterward it becomes slower. The TGA results show that a ∼40% of Justicia adhatoda gets loaded on the silica nanoparticles. In vitro release kinetics of Justicia adhatoda from silica nanoparticles was studied using UV−vis spectroscopy and is shown in Figure 10. For this purpose, silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate was dispersed (2 mg/mL) in the phosphate buffer solution (PBS: 7.4 pH) and an experiment was performed at 35°C. It is observed from this figure that ∼29% of loaded Justicia adhatoda was released within 1 h and then the rate of release becomes slow. Net release of Justicia adhatoda was observed up to 50% within 7 h. These results are quite encouraging owing to the agricultural applications of Justicia adhatoda as entomotoxic agent of stored grains for longer durations.
FIGURE 9
TGA curves for silica nanoparticles (red), Justicia adhatoda extract (black) and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate (blue)
FIGURE 10
Graph of in vitro release kinetics of Justicia adhatoda at 35°C in buffer solution (pH = 7.4)
TGA curves for silica nanoparticles (red), Justicia adhatoda extract (black) and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate (blue)Graph of in vitro release kinetics of Justicia adhatoda at 35°C in buffer solution (pH = 7.4)Insecticidal activity with treated grains: The toxicity potential of the biogenic silica nanoparticles, silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate (JAC) and Justicia adhatoda extract (JAE) S. oryzae, are presented in Figure 10. Based on the results obtained, the silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate exhibited the highest percentage of mortality for storage pest at a concentration level of 1mg of conjugate with 5gm of rice treated over an exposure period of 10 days (Figure 11).
FIGURE 11
Mean mortality percentage of S. oryzae, on rice grain treated with silica nanoparticles, Justicia adhatoda extract and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate
Mean mortality percentage of S. oryzae, on rice grain treated with silica nanoparticles, Justicia adhatoda extract and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugateCholinesterase enzymes inhibitory activity: The initial AChE inhibition activity of the three all the three samples (biogenic silica nanoparticles, silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate (JAC) and Justicia adhatoda extracts) was evaluated on the enzyme supernate extract from insect. Silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate (JAC) and Justicia adhatoda extracts showed potent AChE inhibition for insects. Silica: Justicia adhatodaa conjugate (JAC) and Justicia adhatoda extracts showed high AChE inhibition on enzyme supernate extracted from S. oryzae. The silica nanoparticles showed almost negligible AChE inhibition (Figure 12).
FIGURE 12
Inhibition on acetylcholinesterase enzyme by silica nanoparticles, Justicia adhatoda extract and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate
Inhibition on acetylcholinesterase enzyme by silica nanoparticles, Justicia adhatoda extract and silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate
CONCLUSIONS
Justicia adhatoda loaded biogenic silica nanoparticles epitomises a successful green and non‐bio accumulating slow release biocide system. Justicia adhatoda compounds were covalently bonded to the biogenic silica support and it was possible to increase their stability in water and to promote higher thermal stability as well. In conclusion, we have conjugated Justicia adhatoda with silica nanoparticles by using a simple wet chemical method. Synthesised silica: Justicia adhatoda conjugate was well dispersed and stable in aqueous medium at room temperature. Nearly 40% of Justicia adhatoda was getting loaded on silica as observed from TGA analysis. The inhibition of AChE may have direct effect on bradycardia, bronchoconstriction and prolonged muscle contraction of insects that lead to paralysation and death. The biochemical assay revealed the possible connection between the AChE inhibition and the toxicity.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Authors: Ifrahim Iqbal Chowdhury; Md Atiar Rahman; Mohammad A Hashem; M Mosharef Hossain Bhuiyan; Dina Hajjar; Walla Alelwani; Arwa A Makki; Md Areeful Haque; Jitbanjong Tangpong; M Taher Bin Bakhtiar Journal: Animal Model Exp Med Date: 2020-04-29