Nauman Malik1,2, Benjamin Geraghty1,2,3, Arjun Sahgal1,2,3, Gregory J Czarnota4,5,6,7, Archya Dasgupta1,2,3, Pejman Jabehdar Maralani8,9, Michael Sandhu3, Jay Detsky1,2,3, Chia-Lin Tseng1,2,3, Hany Soliman1,2,3, Sten Myrehaug1,2,3, Zain Husain1,2,3, James Perry10,11, Angus Lau3,12. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 3. Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada. gregory.czarnota@sunnybrook.ca. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. gregory.czarnota@sunnybrook.ca. 6. Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. gregory.czarnota@sunnybrook.ca. 7. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. gregory.czarnota@sunnybrook.ca. 8. Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. 9. Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 10. Department of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. 11. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 12. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The peritumoral region (PTR) of glioblastoma (GBM) appears as a T2W-hyperintensity and is composed of microscopic tumor and edema. Infiltrative low grade glioma (LGG) comprises tumor cells that seem similar to GBM PTR on MRI. The work here explored if a radiomics-based approach can distinguish between the two groups (tumor and edema versus tumor alone). METHODS: Patients with GBM and LGG imaged using a 1.5 T MRI were included in the study. Image data from cases of GBM PTR, and LGG were manually segmented guided by T2W hyperintensity. A set of 91 first-order and texture features were determined from each of T1W-contrast, and T2W-FLAIR, diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Applying filtration techniques, a total of 3822 features were obtained. Different feature reduction techniques were employed, and a subsequent model was constructed using four machine learning classifiers. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to assess classifier performance. RESULTS: The analysis included 42 GBM and 36 LGG. The best performance was obtained using AdaBoost classifier using all the features with a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area of curve (AUC) of 91%, 86%, 89%, and 0.96, respectively. Amongst the feature selection techniques, the recursive feature elimination technique had the best results, with an AUC ranging from 0.87 to 0.92. Evaluation with the F-test resulted in the most consistent feature selection with 3 T1W-contrast texture features chosen in over 90% of instances. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative analysis of conventional MRI sequences can effectively demarcate GBM PTR from LGG, which is otherwise indistinguishable on visual estimation.
BACKGROUND: The peritumoral region (PTR) of glioblastoma (GBM) appears as a T2W-hyperintensity and is composed of microscopic tumor and edema. Infiltrative low grade glioma (LGG) comprises tumor cells that seem similar to GBM PTR on MRI. The work here explored if a radiomics-based approach can distinguish between the two groups (tumor and edema versus tumor alone). METHODS: Patients with GBM and LGG imaged using a 1.5 T MRI were included in the study. Image data from cases of GBM PTR, and LGG were manually segmented guided by T2W hyperintensity. A set of 91 first-order and texture features were determined from each of T1W-contrast, and T2W-FLAIR, diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Applying filtration techniques, a total of 3822 features were obtained. Different feature reduction techniques were employed, and a subsequent model was constructed using four machine learning classifiers. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to assess classifier performance. RESULTS: The analysis included 42 GBM and 36 LGG. The best performance was obtained using AdaBoost classifier using all the features with a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area of curve (AUC) of 91%, 86%, 89%, and 0.96, respectively. Amongst the feature selection techniques, the recursive feature elimination technique had the best results, with an AUC ranging from 0.87 to 0.92. Evaluation with the F-test resulted in the most consistent feature selection with 3 T1W-contrast texture features chosen in over 90% of instances. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative analysis of conventional MRI sequences can effectively demarcate GBM PTR from LGG, which is otherwise indistinguishable on visual estimation.
Authors: Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Timo M Deist; Jurgen Peerlings; Evelyn E C de Jong; Janita van Timmeren; Sebastian Sanduleanu; Ruben T H M Larue; Aniek J G Even; Arthur Jochems; Yvonka van Wijk; Henry Woodruff; Johan van Soest; Tim Lustberg; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Andre Dekker; Felix M Mottaghy; Joachim E Wildberger; Sean Walsh Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Ramon F Barajas; Joanna J Phillips; Rupa Parvataneni; Annette Molinaro; Emma Essock-Burns; Gabriela Bourne; Andrew T Parsa; Manish K Aghi; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Soonmee Cha; Susan M Chang; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Oliver Eidel; Sina Burth; Jan-Oliver Neumann; Pascal J Kieslich; Felix Sahm; Christine Jungk; Philipp Kickingereder; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Sibu Mundiyanapurath; Philipp Bäumer; Wolfgang Wick; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Karl Kiening; Andreas Unterberg; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Teodora Telecan; Iulia Andras; Nicolae Crisan; Lorin Giurgiu; Emanuel Darius Căta; Cosmin Caraiani; Andrei Lebovici; Bianca Boca; Zoltan Balint; Laura Diosan; Monica Lupsor-Platon Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-06-16