| Literature DB >> 34694358 |
Sarah E Waldman1, Tara Buehring2, Daniel J Escobar3, Shruti K Gohil4, Ralph Gonzales5, Susan S Huang4, Keith Olenslager6, Kavitha K Prabaker7, Tessa Sandoval2, Jennifer Yim6, Deborah S Yokoe3, Stuart H Cohen1.
Abstract
In a retrospective, cohort study at 4 medical centers with high coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination rates, we evaluated breakthrough severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Delta variant infections in vaccinated healthcare workers. Few work-related secondary cases were identified. Breakthrough cases were largely due to unmasked social activities outside of work.Entities:
Keywords: B.1.617.2; COVID-19; breakthrough; healthcare worker; vaccination
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34694358 PMCID: PMC8574310 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 20.999
Secondary Cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Infected Vaccinated Healthcare Workers
| Hospital | Number of Breakthrough Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Cases, n | Exposures Related to Infected Vaccinated Healthcare Workers | Secondary Cases Related to Infected Vaccinated Healthcare Workers | Suspected Source of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients, n | Exposed Coworkers Providing Direct Patient Care, n | Exposed Coworkers Providing Nondirect Patient Care, n | Patients, n | Cases Among Direct Patient Care Providers, n | Cases Among Nondirect Patient Care Providers, n | Social Gatherings, n (%) | Household, n (%) | Healthcare, n (%) | Other/ Unknown, n (%) | ||
| A | 43 | 5 | 91 | 19 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 28 (65) | 12 (28) | 2 (5) | 1 (2) |
| B | 35 | 9 | 45 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 (29) | 11 (31) | 0 (0) | 14 (40) |
| C | 105 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17 (16) | 16 (15) | 4 (4) | 68 (65) |
| D[ | 126 | 140 | 195 | 0 | 1 | 65 (53) | 18 (15) | 40 (32) | |||
| Total | 309 | 154 | 381 | 0 | 4 | 120 (39) | 57 (19) | 6 (2) | 123[ | ||
For hospital D, healthcare worker role was not available, and direct and nondirect patient care–related exposures or secondary cases could not be assessed.
Hospital D attributed all infections without a clear community or household source as healthcare even if appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and prevention strategies were followed. For this reason, their counts are classified as unknown, similar to the classification used by the other facilities, since hospital D was unaware of any breach in PPE.