Literature DB >> 34694345

Effect of Antioxidants on Sperm Quality Parameters in Subfertile Men: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Liang Su1, Hua Qu2, Yan Cao1, Jian Zhu1, Si-Zheng Zhang1, Jie Wu1, Yong-Zheng Jiao1.   

Abstract

Antioxidant supplementation has been identified as an important intervention for subfertile men. However, the effectiveness of different antioxidants in improving sperm quality remains unclear. In this study, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was designed to evaluate the effects of different antioxidants on sperm quality parameters in subfertile men. Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antioxidants in subfertile men were searched in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 31, 2021. Eight antioxidants (folic acid, zinc, vitamin E, carnitine, selenium, coenzyme q10 [CoQ10], N-acetylcysteine, and vitamin C) and a placebo (control) were included in our study. A Bayesian NMA with random effects was performed for each outcome (sperm concentration, sperm motility, and sperm morphology); the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) for the effectiveness of each intervention was applied to identify the optimal intervention. Eighteen studies with 1,790 subfertile men were included in the study. CoQ10 elicited a significant increase in sperm concentration (mean difference [MD] = 5.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05, 10.79) compared with the placebo; it achieved the highest rank in efficacy among all the antioxidants (SUCRA: 79.4%). With regard to sperm motility, carnitine (MD = 12.43; 95% CI 4.07, 20.26) and CoQ10 (MD = 7.33; 95% CI 0.35, 14.17) showed significant beneficial effects compared with the placebo; the efficacy of carnitine was the highest among all the antioxidants (SUCRA: 88.7%). With regard to sperm morphology, the efficacy of vitamin C tended to be the highest (SUCRA: 93.6%), although it did not show significant beneficial effect (MD = 7.73; 95% CI -0.94, 16.33) compared with the placebo. Overall, for subfertile men, CoQ10 and carnitine interventions showed better effectiveness in increasing sperm concentration and sperm motility, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The effectiveness of different antioxidants in improving sperm quality in subfertile men remains unclear. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the effectiveness of different antioxidants on sperm quality parameters in subfertile men.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antioxidants; infertility; meta-analysis; sperm quality; systematic review

Year:  2021        PMID: 34694345      PMCID: PMC8970840          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmab127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  54 in total

1.  Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range.

Authors:  Dehui Luo; Xiang Wan; Jiming Liu; Tiejun Tong
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  The Effect of Nutrients and Dietary Supplements on Sperm Quality Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Albert Salas-Huetos; Nuria Rosique-Esteban; Nerea Becerra-Tomás; Barbara Vizmanos; Mònica Bulló; Jordi Salas-Salvadó
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Effects of folic acid and zinc sulfate on male factor subfertility: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Wai Yee Wong; Hans M W M Merkus; Chris M G Thomas; Roelof Menkveld; Gerhard A Zielhuis; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Dias; N J Welton; D M Caldwell; A E Ades
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 on semen parameters, sperm function and reproductive hormones in infertile men.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Safarinejad
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Dietary sugars and cardiometabolic risk factors: a network meta-analysis on isocaloric substitution interventions.

Authors:  Lukas Schwingshackl; Manuela Neuenschwander; Georg Hoffmann; Anette E Buyken; Sabrina Schlesinger
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-18

8.  Antioxidants for male subfertility.

Authors:  Roos M Smits; Rebecca Mackenzie-Proctor; Anusch Yazdani; Marcin T Stankiewicz; Vanessa Jordan; Marian G Showell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-14

Review 9.  Coenzyme Q10 Analogues: Benefits and Challenges for Therapeutics.

Authors:  Juan M Suárez-Rivero; Carmen J Pastor-Maldonado; Suleva Povea-Cabello; Mónica Álvarez-Córdoba; Irene Villalón-García; Manuel Munuera-Cabeza; Alejandra Suárez-Carrillo; Marta Talaverón-Rey; José A Sánchez-Alcázar
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04

10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials implementing aromatase inhibitors to treat male infertility.

Authors:  Francesco Del Giudice; Gian Maria Busetto; Ettore De Berardinis; Isabella Sperduti; Matteo Ferro; Martina Maggi; Martin S Gross; Alessandro Sciarra; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.