Literature DB >> 34693927

Incorporating G6PD genotyping to identify patients with G6PD deficiency.

Sarah A Morris1, Kristine R Crews1, Randall T Hayden2, Clifford M Takemoto3, Wenjian Yang1, Donald K Baker4, Ulrich Broeckel5,6, Mary V Relling1, Cyrine E Haidar1.   

Abstract

Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is a common X-linked enzyme disorder associated with hemolytic anemia after exposure to fava beans or certain medications. Activity testing is the gold standard for detecting G6PD deficiency; however, this test is affected by various hematologic parameters. Clinical G6PD genotyping is now included in pharmacogenetic arrays and clinical sequencing efforts and may be reconciled with activity results. Patients (n = 1391) enrolled on an institutional pharmacogenetic testing protocol underwent clinical G6PD genotyping for 164 G6PD variants. An algorithm accounting for known interferences with the activity assay is proposed. We developed clinical decision support alerts to inform prescribers when high-risk medications were prescribed, warning of gene-drug interactions and recommending therapy alteration. Of 1391 patients with genotype results, 1334 (95.9%) patients were predicted to have normal G6PD activity, 30 (2.1%) were predicted to have variable G6PD activity and 27 (2%) were predicted to have deficient G6PD activity. Of the 417 patients with a normal genotype and an activity result, 415 (99.5%) had a concordant normal G6PD phenotype. Of the 21 patients with a deficient genotype and an activity result, 18 (85.7%) had a concordant deficient activity result. Genotyping reassigned phenotype in five patients with discordant genotype and activity results: three switched from normal to deficient, and two switched from deficient to normal. G6PD activity and genotyping are two independent testing methods that can be used in conjunction to assign a more informed G6PD phenotype than either method alone.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34693927      PMCID: PMC8976699          DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics        ISSN: 1744-6872            Impact factor:   2.089


  20 in total

1.  On the diagnosis of erythrocyte enzyme defects in the presence of high reticulocyte counts.

Authors:  M Lakomek; W Schröter; G De Maeyer; H Winkler
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Both mutations in G6PD A- are necessary to produce the G6PD deficient phenotype.

Authors:  M Town; J M Bautista; P J Mason; L Luzzatto
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  No evidence that G6PD deficiency affects the efficacy or safety of daunorubicin in acute lymphoblastic leukemia induction therapy.

Authors:  Katherine M Robinson; Wenjian Yang; Seth E Karol; Nancy Kornegay; Dennis Jay; Cheng Cheng; John K Choi; Dario Campana; Ching-Hon Pui; Brent Wood; Michael J Borowitz; Julie Gastier-Foster; Eric C Larsen; Naomi Winick; William L Carroll; Mignon L Loh; Elizabeth A Raetz; Stephen P Hunger; Meenakshi Devidas; Elaine R Mardis; Robert S Fulton; Mary V Relling; Sima Jeha
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.

Authors:  Lucio Luzzatto; Mwashungi Ally; Rosario Notaro
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) mutations database: review of the "old" and update of the new mutations.

Authors:  Angelo Minucci; Kamran Moradkhani; Ming Jing Hwang; Cecilia Zuppi; Bruno Giardina; Ettore Capoluongo
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  The global prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ella T Nkhoma; Charles Poole; Vani Vannappagari; Susan A Hall; Ernest Beutler
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Medications and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Ilan Youngster; Lidia Arcavi; Renata Schechmaster; Yulia Akayzen; Hen Popliski; Janna Shimonov; Svetlana Beig; Matitiahu Berkovitch
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.228

8.  Clinically actionable genotypes among 10,000 patients with preemptive pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors:  S L Van Driest; Y Shi; E A Bowton; J S Schildcrout; J F Peterson; J Pulley; J C Denny; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  G6PD testing in support of treatment and elimination of malaria: recommendations for evaluation of G6PD tests.

Authors:  Gonzalo J Domingo; Ari Winasti Satyagraha; Anup Anvikar; Kevin Baird; Germana Bancone; Pooja Bansil; Nick Carter; Qin Cheng; Janice Culpepper; Chi Eziefula; Mark Fukuda; Justin Green; Jimee Hwang; Marcus Lacerda; Sarah McGray; Didier Menard; Francois Nosten; Issarang Nuchprayoon; Nwe Nwe Oo; Pongwit Bualombai; Wadchara Pumpradit; Kun Qian; Judith Recht; Arantxa Roca; Wichai Satimai; Siv Sovannaroth; Lasse S Vestergaard; Lorenz Von Seidlein
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 10.  G6PD deficiency: a classic example of pharmacogenetics with on-going clinical implications.

Authors:  Lucio Luzzatto; Elisa Seneca
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.