Introduction and Objectives: Conventional renal stone dusting is challenging; the holmium (Ho:YAG) laser and holmium with MOSES effect (Ho:YAG-MOSES) fail to uniformly produce fragments ≤100 μm (i.e., dust). The superpulse thulium fiber laser (sTFL) may more effectively render uroliths into "dust," and may thus improve stone-free rates. Accordingly, we performed ex vivo evaluations with all three laser modalities, assessing stone fragments and stone clearance. Methods: Seventy-two ex vivo porcine kidney-ureter models were divided into 12 groups of 6: laser type (Ho:YAG, Ho:YAG-MOSES, sTFL), ureteroscope with and without applied suction, and the presence or absence of a 14F ureteral access sheath (UAS). Calcium oxalate stones were preweighed and implanted into each kidney via a pyelotomy. Stones were treated at 16W using dusting settings of 0.4J × 40Hz (Ho:YAG), 0.2J × 80Hz (Ho:YAG-MOSES), and 0.2J × 80Hz (sTFL) for up to 20 minutes. No stone basketing was performed. Kidneys were bivalved and residual fragments were collected, dried, weighed, and sieved to determine fragment size and stone clearance. Results: Initial stone mass (mg), procedure time (seconds), and laser energy expenditure (kJ) were similar in all 12 groups. The greatest stone clearance was seen with sTFL + suction + UAS (94%) compared with a conventional technique (Ho:YAG + no suction + no UAS) (65%, p < 0.01). The use of sTFL provided greater stone clearance than Ho:YAG or Ho:YAG-MOSES. Aspiration improved stone clearance for sTFL (p = 0.01), but not for Ho:YAG or Ho:YAG-MOSES, consistent with the creation of smaller fragments with sTFL. Presence of a 14F UAS improved stone clearance in all scenarios (p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this ex vivo study, stone clearance was optimized under the following conditions: sTFL, 14F UAS, and aspiration. This combination resulted in 94% of stone fragments being cleared; the 6% remaining fragments were all <2 mm. In all scenarios, deployment of a 14F UAS improved stone clearance.
Introduction and Objectives: Conventional renal stone dusting is challenging; the holmium (Ho:YAG) laser and holmium with MOSES effect (Ho:YAG-MOSES) fail to uniformly produce fragments ≤100 μm (i.e., dust). The superpulse thulium fiber laser (sTFL) may more effectively render uroliths into "dust," and may thus improve stone-free rates. Accordingly, we performed ex vivo evaluations with all three laser modalities, assessing stone fragments and stone clearance. Methods: Seventy-two ex vivo porcine kidney-ureter models were divided into 12 groups of 6: laser type (Ho:YAG, Ho:YAG-MOSES, sTFL), ureteroscope with and without applied suction, and the presence or absence of a 14F ureteral access sheath (UAS). Calcium oxalate stones were preweighed and implanted into each kidney via a pyelotomy. Stones were treated at 16W using dusting settings of 0.4J × 40Hz (Ho:YAG), 0.2J × 80Hz (Ho:YAG-MOSES), and 0.2J × 80Hz (sTFL) for up to 20 minutes. No stone basketing was performed. Kidneys were bivalved and residual fragments were collected, dried, weighed, and sieved to determine fragment size and stone clearance. Results: Initial stone mass (mg), procedure time (seconds), and laser energy expenditure (kJ) were similar in all 12 groups. The greatest stone clearance was seen with sTFL + suction + UAS (94%) compared with a conventional technique (Ho:YAG + no suction + no UAS) (65%, p < 0.01). The use of sTFL provided greater stone clearance than Ho:YAG or Ho:YAG-MOSES. Aspiration improved stone clearance for sTFL (p = 0.01), but not for Ho:YAG or Ho:YAG-MOSES, consistent with the creation of smaller fragments with sTFL. Presence of a 14F UAS improved stone clearance in all scenarios (p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this ex vivo study, stone clearance was optimized under the following conditions: sTFL, 14F UAS, and aspiration. This combination resulted in 94% of stone fragments being cleared; the 6% remaining fragments were all <2 mm. In all scenarios, deployment of a 14F UAS improved stone clearance.
Authors: Antoni Sánchez-Puy; Alejandra Bravo-Balado; Pietro Diana; Michael Baboudjian; Alberto Piana; Irene Girón; Andrés K Kanashiro; Oriol Angerri; Pablo Contreras; Brian H Eisner; Josep Balañà; Francisco M Sánchez-Martín; Félix Millán; Joan Palou; Esteban Emiliani Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-04 Impact factor: 4.964