Literature DB >> 34693644

Introduction to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists.

Matthew J Page1, David Moher2,3, Joanne E McKenzie1.   

Abstract

Systematic reviews should be reported completely and accurately so that users can interpret and appraise the review findings appropriately. In this commentary, we describe key features of a major update of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement-PRISMA 2020-and discuss its implications for research synthesis methodologists.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  checklist; meta-analysis; reporting; systematic review; transparency

Mesh：

Year:  2021        PMID： 34693644     DOI： 10.1002/jrsm.1535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN： 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Image Processing Techniques for Deepfakes.

Authors:  Hina Fatima Shahzad; Furqan Rustam; Emmanuel Soriano Flores; Juan Luís Vidal Mazón; Isabel de la Torre Diez; Imran Ashraf
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  How to Integrate Sex and Gender Medicine into Medical and Allied Health Profession Undergraduate, Graduate, and Post-Graduate Education: Insights from a Rapid Systematic Literature Review and a Thematic Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Rola Khamisy-Farah; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-11

3.  Incidence and outcomes of critical illness in Indigenous Peoples: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Samantha L Bowker; Kienan Williams; Aireen Wingert; Jamie M Boyd; Melissa L Potestio; Michelle Gates; Erica Wright; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 4.  Problematic use of digital media in children and adolescents with a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder compared to controls. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Maria Werling; Sajiv Kuzhippallil; Sophie Emery; Susanne Walitza; Renate Drechsler
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 7.772

5.  Data Mining as a Tool to Infer Chicken Carcass and Meat Cut Quality from Autochthonous Genotypes.

Authors:  Antonio González Ariza; Francisco Javier Navas González; José Manuel León Jurado; Ander Arando Arbulu; Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo; María Esperanza Camacho Vallejo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Post-secondary Student Mental Health During COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jenney Zhu; Nicole Racine; Elisabeth Bailin Xie; Julianna Park; Julianna Watt; Rachel Eirich; Keith Dobson; Sheri Madigan
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.157
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.