| Literature DB >> 34692511 |
Kaiyu Sun1, Hui Wang2, Xianqun Xu3, Xiuqi Wei4, Jingyu Su4, Kaidong Zhu4, Junli Fan3.
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the value of tumor-educated platelet (TEP) miR-18a-3p in the early diagnosis and chemotherapy efficacy monitoring of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Entities:
Keywords: chemotherapy; early diagnosis; liquid-biopsy; miR-18a-3p; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; tumor-educated platelet
Year: 2021 PMID: 34692511 PMCID: PMC8526886 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Primers used for cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR.
| Primers | Sequence (5’~3’) |
|---|---|
| miR-18a-3p-S | ACACTCCAGCTGGGACTGCCCTAAGTGCTCC |
| miR-18a-3p-RT* | CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGCCAGAAGG |
| URP | TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG |
| U6-F | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA |
| U6-RT* | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
*cDNA synthesis primers.
Figure 1Relative expression levels of miR-18a-3p in platelet and plasma of NPC patients and healthy controls. (A) The expression levels of TEP miR-18a-3p in NPC patients were significantly higher than that in healthy controls. (B) There was no significant difference of plasma miR-18a-3p levels between NPC and control groups. Mann–Whitney U test was used for analysis. ****p < 0.0001. NS, no significance.
Figure 2ROC of miR-18a-3p in TEP for NPC.
Correlations between expression levels of TEP miR-18a-3p and clinical parameters of NPC.
| Clinical parameters | N | TEP miR-18a-3p |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | High% | |||
| Age | 54 | 45.85 ± 9.83 | 49.55 ± 10.67 | – | 0.392b |
| n=7 | n=47 | ||||
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 35 | 3 | 32 | 91.4 | 0.226 |
| Female | 19 | 4 | 15 | 78.9 | |
| Hypertension | 8 | 0 | 8 | 100 | 0.576 |
| Diabetes | 6 | 1 | 5 | 83.3 | >0.999 |
| Nasopharyngitis | 11 | 0 | 11 | 100 | 0.322 |
| Smoking | 12 | 1 | 11 | 91.7 | >0.999 |
| Alcohol drinking | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100 | >0.999 |
| Tumor type | |||||
| Undifferentiated | 50 | 6 | 44 | 88.0 | 0.436 |
| Differentiated | 4 | 1 | 3 | 75.0 | |
| T classification | |||||
| T1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0 | 0.806 |
| T2 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 90.0 | |
| T3 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 86.7 | |
| T4 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 94.1 | |
| Lymph node status | |||||
| N0~N1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 100.0 | 0.416 |
| N2 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 86.4 | |
| N3 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 88.9 | |
| Metastatic status | |||||
| M0 | 43 | 4 | 39 | 90.7 | 0.580 |
| M1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100.0 | |
| EBV DNA | |||||
| Negative | 16 | 2 | 14 | 87.5 | 0.064a |
| Positive | 32 | 5 | 27 | 84.4 | |
Positive rate of TEP miR-18a-3p: 85.4%.
Positive rate of EBV DNA: 66.7%.
aMcNemar and Kappa tests, bindependent-samples t-test, all others are Fisher test.
Figure 3There was no significant change in relative expression levels of TEP miR-18a-3p among different TNM stages of NPC. (A) Relative expression levels of TEP miR-18a-3p in T1-T4 stages; (B) Relative expression levels of TEP miR-18a-3p in N0~1, N2, and N3 stages; (C) Relative expression levels of TEP miR-18a-3p in M0 and M1 stages. Mann–Whitney U test was used for analysis.
The p values of comparing relative expression levels of TEP miR-18a-3p among groups with different TNM stages of NPC.
| T1-T2 | T1-T3 | T1-T4 | T2-T3 | T2-T4 | T3-T4 | N0~1-N2 | N0~1-N3 | N2-N3 | M0-M1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-18a-3p | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.66 |
Figure 4Dynamic changes of TEP miR-18a-3p and EBV DNA with chemotherapy. (A) Dynamic changes of TEP miR-18a-3p and EBV DNA with chemotherapy of patient (A, B) Dynamic changes of TEP miR-18a-3p and EBV DNA with chemotherapy of patient (B, C) Dynamic changes of TEP miR-18a-3p and EBV DNA with chemotherapy of patient (C) chemo, chemotherapy.