Literature DB >> 34692211

Machine learning model with physical constraints for diffuse optical tomography.

Yun Zou1, Yifeng Zeng1, Shuying Li1, Quing Zhu1,2.   

Abstract

A machine learning model with physical constraints (ML-PC) is introduced to perform diffuse optical tomography (DOT) reconstruction. DOT reconstruction is an ill-posed and under-determined problem, and its quality suffers by model mismatches, complex boundary conditions, tissue-probe contact, noise etc. Here, for the first time, we combine ultrasound-guided DOT with ML to facilitate DOT reconstruction. Our method has two key components: (i) a neural network based on auto-encoder is adopted for DOT reconstruction, and (ii) physical constraints are implemented to achieve accurate reconstruction. Both qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate that the accuracy of the proposed method surpasses that of existing models. In a phantom study, compared with the Born conjugate gradient descent (Born-CGD) reconstruction method, the ML-PC method decreases the mean percentage error of the reconstructed maximum absorption coefficient from 16.41% to 13.4% for high contrast phantoms and from 23.42% to 9.06% for low contrast phantoms, with improved depth distribution of the target absorption maps. In a clinical study, better contrast was obtained between malignant and benign breast lesions, with the ratio of the medians of the maximum absorption coefficient improved from 1.63 to 2.22.
© 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34692211      PMCID: PMC8515969          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.432786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.562


  27 in total

1.  Estimate of tissue composition in malignant and benign breast lesions by time-domain optical mammography.

Authors:  Giovanna Quarto; Lorenzo Spinelli; Antonio Pifferi; Alessandro Torricelli; Rinaldo Cubeddu; Francesca Abbate; Nicola Balestreri; Simona Menna; Enrico Cassano; Paola Taroni
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging.

Authors:  Qianqian Fang; Juliette Selb; Stefan A Carp; Gregory Boverman; Eric L Miller; Dana H Brooks; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; David A Boas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Fast and efficient image reconstruction for high density diffuse optical imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  Xue Wu; Adam T Eggebrecht; Silvina L Ferradal; Joseph P Culver; Hamid Dehghani
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Regional imager for low-resolution functional imaging of the brain with diffusing near-infrared light.

Authors:  R M Danen; Y Wang; X D Li; W S Thayer; A G Yodh
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Diffuse Optics for Tissue Monitoring and Tomography.

Authors:  T Durduran; R Choe; W B Baker; A G Yodh
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2010-07

6.  Structural similarity index family for image quality assessment in radiological images.

Authors:  Gabriel Prieto Renieblas; Agustín Turrero Nogués; Alberto Muñoz González; Nieves Gómez-Leon; Eduardo Guibelalde Del Castillo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-26

7.  Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography for Predicting and Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancers: Recent Progress.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Hamed Vavadi; Alex Merkulov; Hai Li; Mohsen Erfanzadeh; Atahar Mostafa; Yanping Gong; Hassan Salehi; Susan Tannenbaum; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Assessment of Functional Differences in Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions and Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy by Using US-guided Diffuse Optical Tomography in Conjunction with Conventional US.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Andrew Ricci; Poornima Hegde; Mark Kane; Edward Cronin; Alex Merkulov; Yan Xu; Behnoosh Tavakoli; Susan Tannenbaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Dual-mesh optical tomography reconstruction method with a depth correction that uses a priori ultrasound information.

Authors:  Minming Huang; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 1.980

10.  Parametric estimation of 3D tubular structures for diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Fridrik Larusson; Pamela G Anderson; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Misha E Kilmer; Angelo Sassaroli; Sergio Fantini; Eric L Miller
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regression-based neural network for improving image reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Ganesh M Balasubramaniam; Shlomi Arnon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 2.  Deep learning in macroscopic diffuse optical imaging.

Authors:  Jason T Smith; Marien Ochoa; Denzel Faulkner; Grant Haskins; Xavier Intes
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 3.758

3.  Difference imaging from single measurements in diffuse optical tomography: a deep learning approach.

Authors:  Shuying Li; Menghao Zhang; Minghao Xue; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.758

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.