Literature DB >> 34691329

An Analysis of Global Research Trends and Top-Cited Research Articles in Cardio-Oncology.

Giselle Alexandra Suero-Abreu1, Aldo Barajas-Ochoa1, Robert Berkowitz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As novel cancer therapies continue to improve patient outcomes, there is an increased need for prevention and management of the cardiovascular side effects of these therapies. For this reason, the field of cardio-oncology has experienced significant scientific growth, particularly during the last decade. This study aims to assess the global publication trends and highlight the top-cited scientific articles related to cardio-oncology.
METHODS: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of multiple scientific databases was performed to characterize global publication trends in cardio-oncology from 1864 to 2020 and to determine the top-cited papers addressing cardio-oncology as a field of study.
RESULTS: We identified 1,294 publications with 14,494 citations that describe cardio-oncology as a field. Cardio-oncology was the most prevalent term in the literature and was first mentioned in an article from Italy in 1996. There was no further mention of the term "cardio-oncology" until 2003, and later again in 2008. After 2010, there was a consistent increase in the number of publications and citations in cardio-oncology. Among the top 50 most cited papers, there was a noticeable trend of higher number of review articles (n = 28, 56%, with 3,208 citations), followed by guidelines and position papers (n = 9, 18%, with 2,299 citations) and original research articles (n = 9, 18%, with 1,451 citations). The most common specialty for the senior corresponding authors of the top 50 most cited papers was cardiology (n = 36; 72%), followed by oncology (n = 5; 10%); and the most prevalent countries of origin were the USA (n = 26; 52%), Italy (n = 8; 16%), and Canada (n = 6; 12%).
CONCLUSION: Our quantitative analysis of publication trends in the field of cardio-oncology objectively showed the growing scientific interest in the field. To our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric analysis that determined the top 50 most cited articles in the field of cardio-oncology. Copyright 2021, Suero-Abreu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bibliometric analysis; Cardio-hemato-oncology; Cardio-oncology; Onco-cardiology; Research trends; Top articles

Year:  2021        PMID: 34691329      PMCID: PMC8510654          DOI: 10.14740/cr1291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol Res        ISSN: 1923-2829


Introduction

Cardio-oncology is an emergent discipline that focuses on preventing and reducing cardiotoxicity related to cancer therapies [1]. Bibliometrics implements statistical methods to analyze publications and explore the growth or impact of a field. It can also provide an objective measure of landmark articles and peer recognition of scientific work by identifying the most cited publications in a given field [2]. As the cardio-oncology field continues to advance, it is important to recognize the significant evolution of this body of academic work and highlight the publications that have introduced and defined the field. In this study, we assessed the global research trends and growth of the field of cardio-oncology and analyzed the top 50 most cited articles.

Materials and Methods

A bibliometric analysis of the literature in the field of cardio-oncology was performed using the multidisciplinary databases Scopus, Pubmed, and Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). The terms “cardio-oncology”, “onco-cardiology”, “cardio-onco-hematology”, and “cardio-immuno-oncology” were searched (both hyphenated and non-hyphenated) for all languages for the years 1864 to 2020. The final search was conducted on March 31, 2021, and the terms were queried as “abstract title, abstract, and keywords” for Scopus and Pubmed, and as “topic” for WOSCC. All articles from the search results were independently verified by two reviewers and were included in the analysis if they addressed cardio-oncology as a field of study in the keywords, title, or abstract. Articles that did not focus on cardio-oncology were excluded. Each article was reviewed for its number of citations, year of publication, and journal of publication. When duplicates were found, the entry with fewer citations was eliminated. For those articles that were co-published in two or more journals, the entry with the highest citations was kept and the citations from the other entries were added to this entry. Publication output for each year was analyzed and a list of the 50 most cited articles in the field was generated, as well as a list of journals publishing cardio-oncology articles. The top 50 most cited articles were reviewed for their citations, year of publication, type of article (i.e., original article, position paper/society guideline, review, systematic review, conference paper, letter to the editor, and case report), journal, and characteristics of the corresponding author (i.e., field of study and country of origin). Due to the public nature of the data used in the study, informed consent for this study was not obtained and it was exempt from Institutional Review Board approval. This study was conducted in compliance with all applicable institutional ethical standards for human study.

Results

As of March 31, 2021, a total of 1,294 publications related to cardio-oncology as a field with a total of 14,494 citations were found. There was a consistent increase in the number of articles referring to cardio-oncology and the number of citations over the past two decades (Fig. 1). The articles per year were 1 in 1996, 1 in 2003, 2 in 2008, 7 in 2010, 14 in 2011, 12 in 2012, 28 in 2013, 47 in 2014, 75 in 2015, 115 in 2016, 176 in 2017, 184 in 2018, 261 in 2019, and 371 in 2020.
Figure 1

Trends of global cardio-oncology research. Results from bibliometric analysis from 1864 to 2020 illustrate number of publications (a) and number of citations of articles (b) in cardio-oncology.

Trends of global cardio-oncology research. Results from bibliometric analysis from 1864 to 2020 illustrate number of publications (a) and number of citations of articles (b) in cardio-oncology. Cardio-oncology was the first term used to describe the field and has remained the most used in the literature compared to the other names associated with the field. In this regard, we identified additional terms referring to the field which arose later in the literature such as: onco-cardiology (in 2008), cardio-onco-hematology (in 2017), and cardio-immuno-oncology (in 2018). The term cardio-oncology was coined in 1996 by Dr. Daniela Cardinale, a cardiologist from Italy, in an article entitled “Una nuova frontiera: la cardioncologia” in the Italian journal Cardiologia (27 citations; first citation in 2010) [3]. There was no further mention of the term “cardio-oncology” until 2003 (one article, one citation), and then later in 2008 (two articles, one and 25 citations). After 2010 and particularly between 2015 and 2020, there has been a significant growth in the number of publications referring to cardio-oncology as a field, likely triggered by the increased recognition of cardiac-related side effects of novel cancer treatments, such as targeted and immunomodulating therapies. The top 50 most cited articles in the field of cardio-oncology had a combined total of 7,192 citations as of March 2021 (Table 1). The number of citations per publication ranged from 49 to 986 (mean 143 ± 157). The most cited articles to date were published between 2010 and 2020, with the majority between 2015 and 2020 (n = 31, 62%). All articles were in English and most article types were reviews (n = 28, 56%, with 3,208 citations), followed by guidelines and position papers (n = 9, 18%, with 2,299 citations) and original articles (n = 9, 18%, with 1,451 citations). The rest of the articles were one letter to the editor, one systematic review, one case report, and one conference paper.
Table 1

Fifty Top Cited Articles in Cardio-Oncologya

CitationsYearJournalAuthorsCorresponding author (Country)TitleDocument typeCorresponding author field
19862016European Heart JournalZamorano JL et alZamorano JL (Spain)2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice GuidelinesPP or GuidebCardiology
24992010Journal of the National Cancer InstituteAlbini A et alAlbini A (Italy)Cardiotoxicity of anticancer drugs: The need for cardio-oncology and cardio-oncological preventionReviewMolecular oncology
34632012Annals of OncologyCurigliano G et alCurigliano G (Italy)Cardiovascular toxicity induced by chemotherapy, targeted agents and radiotherapy: ESMO clinical practice guidelinesPP or GuideOncology
43212018Journal of the American College of CardiologyMahmood SS et alNeilan TG (USA)Myocarditis in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsOriginal articleCardiology
52882011European Journal of Heart FailureEschenhagen T et alEschenhagen T (Germany)Cardiovascular side effects of cancer therapies: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of CardiologyPP or GuideCardiology
62702014Journal of the American College of CardiologyKy B et alKy B (USA)Early increases in multiple biomarkers predict subsequent cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer treated with doxorubicin, taxanes, and trastuzumabOriginal articleCardiology
72562013European Heart JournalSuter TM et alSuter TM (Switzerland)Cancer drugs and the heart: Importance and managementReviewCardiology
82182017Canadian Journal of CardiologyEzekowitz JA et alEzekowitz JA (Canada)2017 Comprehensive Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Heart FailurePP or GuideCardiology
92032012Journal of the American College of CardiologyChen J et alChen J (USA)Incidence of Heart Failure or Cardiomyopathy After Adjuvant Trastuzumab Therapy for Breast CancerOriginal articleCardiology
101992013JACC: Cardiovascular ImagingDrafts BC et alHundley WG (USA)Low to moderate dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy is associated with early noninvasive imaging evidence of subclinical cardiovascular diseaseOriginal articleCardiology
111842016CA: A Cancer Journal for CliniciansCurigliano G et alCurigliano G (Italy)Cardiotoxicity of Anticancer Treatments: Epidemiology, Detection, and ManagementReviewOncology
121722014Mayo Clinic ProceedingsHerrmann J et alHerrmann J (USA)Evaluation and management of patients with heart disease and cancer: Cardio-oncologyReviewCardiology
131642017Journal of the American College of CardiologyCollier P et alCollier P (USA)A Test in Context: Myocardial Strain Measured by Speckle-Tracking EchocardiographyReviewCardiology
141462014Journal of the American Heart AssociationHahn VS et alLenihan DJ (USA)Cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity: Basic mechanisms and potential cardioprotective therapiesReviewCardiology
151432017Journal of Clinical OncologyPituskin E et alPaterson DI (Canada)Multidisciplinary approach to novel therapies in cardio-oncology research (MANTICORE 101-Breast): A randomized trial for the prevention of trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicityOriginal articleCardiology
161402014Journal of the American College of CardiologyFarmakis D et alFilippatos G (Greece)Insights Into Onco-Cardiology Atrial Fibrillation in CancerReviewCardiology
171262016Circulation ResearchLenneman CG et alLenneman CG (USA)Cardio-Oncology An Update on Cardiotoxicity of Cancer-Related TreatmentReviewCardiology
181182015Plos OneFocaccetti C et alAlbini A (Italy)Effects of 5-Fluorouracil on Morphology, Cell Cycle, Proliferation, Apoptosis, Autophagy and ROS Production in Endothelial Cells and CardiomyocytesOriginal articleMolecular oncology
191112015Journal of the American College of CardiologyBarac A et alBarac A (USA)Cardiovascular health of patients with cancer and cancer survivors: A roadmap to the next levelReviewCardiology
201102012Experimental and Molecular PathologyWeerasinghe, P et alWeerasinghe P (USA)Oncosis: An important non-apoptotic mode of cell deathReviewPathology
211082013Drug SafetyShah RR et alShah RR (UK)Cardiovascular safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: With a special focus on cardiac repolarisation (QT Interval)ReviewCardiology
221042013Circulation ResearchKy B et alMoslehi J (USA)Emerging paradigms in cardiomyopathies associated with cancer therapiesReviewCardiology
23922017OncotargetKoleini N et alKardami E (Canada)Autophagy and mitophagy in the context of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicityReviewMolecular biology
24912016Canadian Journal of CardiologyVirani SA et alVirani SA (Canada)Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer TherapyPP or GuideCardiology
25892015Journal of the American College of CardiologyLi W et alMoslehi J (USA)Vascular and Metabolic Implications of Novel Targeted Cancer Therapies: Focus on Kinase InhibitorsReviewCardiology
26822014Journal of Pineal ResearchGovender J et alEngelbrecth, A (South Africa)Mitochondrial catastrophe during doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: A review of the protective role of melatoninReviewPhysiology
27792019Cardiovascular ResearchHu JR et alMosheli J (USA)Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitorsReviewCardiology
28732017Lancet OncologyLevis BE et alShapiro CL (USA)Cardiotoxic effects of anthracycline-based therapy: what is the evidence and what are the potential harms?ReviewOncology
29732020Annals of OncologyCurigliano G et alESMO Guidelines CommitteeManagement of cardiac disease in cancer patients throughout oncological treatment: ESMO consensus recommendationsPP or GuideOncology
30692019European Heart JournalLancellotti P et alLancelloti P (Belgium)Cardio-oncology services: Rationale, organization, and implementatio: A report from the ESC Cardio-Oncology councilReviewCardiology
31692018European Journal of CancerCardinale D et alLatini R (Italy)Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: A multicenter randomised trial comparing two strategies for guiding prevention with enalapril: The International CardioOncology Society-one trialOriginal articleCardiology
32682017Journal for Immunotherapy of CancerNorwood TG et alConry RM (USA)Smoldering myocarditis following immune checkpoint blockadeCase ReportOncology
33682016Catheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsIliescu CA et alMarmagkiolis K (USA)SCAI Expert consensus statement: Evaluation, management, and special considerations of cardio-oncology patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (endorsed by the cardiological society of india, and sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologa intervencionista)PP or GuideCardiology
34682015CirculationBellinger AM et alMoslehi J (USA)Cardio-oncology: How new targeted cancer therapies and precision medicine can inform cardiovascular discoveryReviewCardiology
35672016Mayo Clinic ProceedingsAl-Kindi SG et alOliveira GH (USA)Prevalence of Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Different Types of Cancer the Unmet Need for Onco-CardiologyOriginal articleCardiology
36662010Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental TherapeuticsMinotti G et alMinotti G (Italy)Pharmacological foundations of cardio-oncologyReviewPharmacology
37652013Journal of Nuclear CardiologySchwartz RG et alStorozynsky E (USA)Traditional and novel methods to assess and prevent chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction noninvasivelyReviewCardiology
38642018Pharmacological ResearchCappetta D et alDe Angelis A (Italy)Doxorubicin targets multiple players: A new view of an old problemReviewCardiology
39632019CirculationBonaca MP et alBonaca MP (USA) Moslehi J (USA)Myocarditis in the Setting of Cancer Therapeutics: Proposed Case Definitions for Emerging Clinical Syndromes in Cardio-OncologyReviewCardiology
40612019European Heart JournalSturgeon KM et alZaorsky NG (USA)A population-based study of cardiovascular disease mortality risk in US cancer patientsOriginal articleRadiation oncology
41602017Revista Espanola de CardiologiaLopez-Fernandez T et alLopez-Fernandez T (Spain)Cardio-Onco-Hematology in Clinical Practice. Position Paper and Recommendations (Cardio-Onco-Hematologia en la practica clinica. Documento de consenso y recomendaciones)PP or GuideCardiology
42592010Clinical CardiologyHong RA et alLimura T (USA)Cardio-oncology/onco-cardiologyReviewInternal medicine
43592016World Journal of CardiologyCuomo JR et alWeintraub NL (USA)Novel concepts in radiation-induced cardiovascular diseaseReviewCardiology
44582018CirculationScott, JM et alScott JM (USA)Exercise Therapy and Cardiovascular Toxicity in CancerReviewExercise oncology
45582014International Journal of CardiologyPatane SPatane S (Italy)Cardiotoxicity: Cisplatin and long-term cancer survivorsLetter to EditorCardiology
46582018Basic Research in CardiologyDavidson SM et alYellon DM (UK)The 10th Biennial Hatter Cardiovascular Institute workshop: cellular protection - evaluating new directions in the setting of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardio-oncologyMeeting ReportMolecular and cellular cardiology
47532016Canadian Journal of CardiologyJohnson CB et alJohnson CB (Canada)Shared Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: Implications for Preventive Health and Clinical Care in Oncology PatientsReviewCardiology
48522019CirculationGilchrist SC et alAmerican Heart Association (USA)Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation to Manage Cardiovascular Outcomes in Cancer Patients and Survivors: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart AssociationPP or GuideCardiology
49502017Journal of the American Heart AssociationPorta-Sanchez A et alThavendiranathan P (Canada)Incidence, diagnosis, and management of QT prolongation induced by cancer therapies: A systematic reviewSystematic reviewCardiology
50492013Journal of the American College of CardiologyLal H et alForce T (USA)Cancer Genetics and the Cardiotoxicity of the TherapeuticsReviewCardiology

aData as of final search date March 31, 2021. bPP or Guide: position paper or guideline.

aData as of final search date March 31, 2021. bPP or Guide: position paper or guideline. Among the top 50 most cited papers, the subject matter was varied, with the most common topics being based on clinical research or practice. The most cited article was titled “2016 ESC position paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines”, authored by Zamorano et al and published in 2016 [4]. Interestingly, there were nine guidelines/position papers among the top 50 most cited articles and three (two by professional societies from cardiology and one from oncology) were among the top five most cited articles [4-6]. The review article “Cardiotoxicity of anticancer drugs: The need for cardio-oncology and cardio-oncological prevention” by Albini et al, published in 2010, was the second most cited paper with 499 citations [1]. The most cited original research article was “Myocarditis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors” (ICIs) by Mahmood et al (321 citations since its publication in 2018), which highlighted the presentation and clinical course of the potentially fatal myocarditis associated with ICIs [7]. Notably, the most common specialty for the senior corresponding authors of the top 50 most cited papers was cardiology (n = 36; 72%), followed by oncology (n = 5; 10%). The most prevalent countries of origin were the USA (n = 26), Italy (n = 8), and Canada (n = 6). Table 2 shows the top 10 journals with the highest number of cardio-oncology publications over time. The list includes two dedicated cardio-oncology journals, JACC Cardio-Oncology and Cardio-Oncology, which launched in 2019 and 2015, respectively. The main focus for the rest of the journals in the list was cardiology. The three journals with the most articles on the 50 most cited list were Journal of the American College of Cardiology (eight publications with 1,347 citations), European Heart Journal (four publications with 1,372 citations), and Circulation (four publications with 241 citations).
Table 2

Top 10 Journals for Cardio-Oncology Publicationsa

Journal titleNumber of published articles
JACC: Cardiooncology51
Circulation47
International Journal of Cardiology40
Journal of the American College of Cardiology40
European Journal of Heart Failure36
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine30
European Heart Journal23
Cardiooncology22
Journal of the American Heart Association19
Current Cardiology Reports18

aData as of final search date March 31, 2021.

aData as of final search date March 31, 2021.

Discussion

This bibliometric analysis of the publication trends in the field of cardio-oncology, from the coining of the term in the first published article in 1996 to date, shows the significant growth of the field in the last years. We quantitatively demonstrated its increasing relevance and attention, based on the number of publications and citations specifically related to the field. In addition, this is the first bibliometric analysis identifying the most cited articles specifically related to cardio-oncology to provide an overview of some of its fundamental developments. Bibliometric studies of emerging fields and the identification of most cited articles may provide insight on which studies have had the most impact and can help guide further research efforts. However, these assessments may not entirely reflect all the publications that enabled the field’s advancement. In this regard, there are many publications of basic, translational, and clinical studies that have contributed significantly to the field of cardio-oncology but have not used the keywords specifically related to the field which were queried in this study. For instance, a paper by Johnson et al published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2016 highlighted fulminant myocarditis as a serious cardiotoxicity with immune checkpoint blockade, and has more than one thousand citations to date [8]. Nevertheless, this article is not present in the list of the top 50 most cited articles because the terms related to the cardio-oncology field per se were not used in the publication title, abstract, or keywords. This highlights the importance of adopting and using standard terms when conducting cardio-oncology research to allow for appropriate dissemination of research in the field. In all the publications analyzed in our study, there was a noticeable trend of higher number of review articles, guidelines/position papers, and letters to the editors compared to original research articles. The main article type among the top 50 articles were reviews which is consistent with the fact that review articles tend to become highly cited in scientific literature [2]. Similarly, nine articles in the top 50 most cited were guidelines/position papers by professional societies and three were among the top five most cited articles. This also reflects the fact that professional society guidelines and position statements usually become widely cited documents within a field, given their reach to a broader audience and direct impact on clinical practice [9]. In general, the main agents associated with cardiotoxicities discussed in the publications included: 1) traditional chemotherapy agents such as: antracyclines (i.e., doxorubicin), alkylating agents (i.e., cyclophosphamide), antimetabolites (i.e., 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, and gemcitabine), and antimicrotubule agents (i.e., paclitaxel, docetaxel, and vincristine); 2) trastuzumab; 3) ICI covering programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (i.e., pembrolizumab and nivolumab) and CTLA-4 inhibitors (i.e., ipilimumab); and 4) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (i.e., ibrutinib and imatinib). This bibliometric study used multiple databases and publications in order to capture the growing research trend in cardio-oncology in a comprehensive manner, in contrast with the study of Wei et al where a single database (WOSCC) was queried [10]. Although WOSCC is one of the largest databases for peer-reviewed scientific literature and provides a comprehensive source for bibliometric studies, there are several limitations that need to be considered when querying a single database. Despite a good correlation on the number of indexed articles and citations between several databases, there are known differences among them, leading to articles and citations being missed through the use of a single indexing database [2, 11-14]. In our study, Scopus, WOSCC, and Pubmed were searched in all languages using multiple terms that have been used to refer to the field over the years to avoid missing cardio-oncology publications and citations. This comprehensive approach captured the dynamic nature of this emerging field and resulted in a higher number of articles found in our study when compared to prior publications on the bibliometrics of cardio-oncology. This is illustrated by comparing the 343 publications found by 2018 in studies using a single database [10] with our approach, which found 662 publications by that date. Although several databases were queried using a comprehensive approach, limitations of this study must be noted. For example, our search strategy was limited to keywords related to cardio-oncology as a field and excluded generic keywords such as “cardiotoxicity” in order to reflect publications that specifically adopted terms that referred to cardio-oncology as a field. As described, this approach did not include some scientific papers related to long-standing research on the cardiotoxic effects of cancer therapies that have created the foundation of knowledge in current cardio-oncology. This can account to the fact that few articles among the top 50 most cited are original research articles. Despite this, our results show that the scientific output specifically classified as cardio-oncology research, including original basic and translational studies, has increased significantly over the past two decades, greatly influenced by cardiology and oncology leaders in the field and supported by dedicated cardio-oncology journals, cardio-oncology societies, and scientific events globally.

Conclusion

Cardio-oncology has blossomed as a field and its impact is expected to continue to expand. In this study, we showed the growing scientific interest in the field of cardio-oncology and analyzed its top 50 most cited articles. Despite the growth of the field, there is a need to expand our research efforts towards more original basic and translational research studies and to adopt standard terms for the indexing of research related to the field.
  12 in total

1.  [A new frontier: cardio-oncology].

Authors:  D Cardinale
Journal:  Cardiologia       Date:  1996-09

2.  Professional Societies Should Abstain From Authorship of Guidelines and Disease Definition Statements.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-10

3.  Cardiovascular toxicity induced by chemotherapy, targeted agents and radiotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  G Curigliano; D Cardinale; T Suter; G Plataniotis; E de Azambuja; M T Sandri; C Criscitiello; A Goldhirsch; C Cipolla; F Roila
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Myocarditis in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Syed S Mahmood; Michael G Fradley; Justine V Cohen; Anju Nohria; Kerry L Reynolds; Lucie M Heinzerling; Ryan J Sullivan; Rongras Damrongwatanasuk; Carol L Chen; Dipti Gupta; Michael C Kirchberger; Magid Awadalla; Malek Z O Hassan; Javid J Moslehi; Sachin P Shah; Sarju Ganatra; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Donald P Lawrence; John D Groarke; Tomas G Neilan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Fulminant Myocarditis with Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

Authors:  Douglas B Johnson; Justin M Balko; Margaret L Compton; Spyridon Chalkias; Joshua Gorham; Yaomin Xu; Mellissa Hicks; Igor Puzanov; Matthew R Alexander; Tyler L Bloomer; Jason R Becker; David A Slosky; Elizabeth J Phillips; Mark A Pilkinton; Laura Craig-Owens; Nina Kola; Gregory Plautz; Daniel S Reshef; Jonathan S Deutsch; Raquel P Deering; Benjamin A Olenchock; Andrew H Lichtman; Dan M Roden; Christine E Seidman; Igor J Koralnik; Jonathan G Seidman; Robert D Hoffman; Janis M Taube; Luis A Diaz; Robert A Anders; Jeffrey A Sosman; Javid J Moslehi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Análisis bibliométrico de las revistas médicas del Sistema de Clasificación de Revistas Mexicanas de Ciencia y Tecnología.

Authors:  Aldo Barajas-Ochoa; Zalathiel Barajas-Ochoa; César Ramos-Remus
Journal:  Gac Med Mex       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 0.302

7.  Bibliometric Analysis of the Results of Cardio-Oncology Research.

Authors:  Kangkang Wei; Jiangquan Liao; Jiangmeng Chang; Xiaoqiong Zhang; Ming Chen; Jinhang Du
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 8.  Cardiotoxicity of anticancer drugs: the need for cardio-oncology and cardio-oncological prevention.

Authors:  Adriana Albini; Giuseppina Pennesi; Francesco Donatelli; Rosaria Cammarota; Silvio De Flora; Douglas M Noonan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines:  The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Jose Luis Zamorano; Patrizio Lancellotti; Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Victor Aboyans; Riccardo Asteggiano; Maurizio Galderisi; Gilbert Habib; Daniel J Lenihan; Gregory Y H Lip; Alexander R Lyon; Teresa Lopez Fernandez; Dania Mohty; Massimo F Piepoli; Juan Tamargo; Adam Torbicki; Thomas M Suter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Sindhuja Tatagari; Sandro C Esteves; Avi Harlev; Ralf Henkel; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Sheryl Homa; Nicolás Garrido Puchalt; Ranjith Ramasamy; Ahmad Majzoub; Kim Dao Ly; Eva Tvrda; Mourad Assidi; Kavindra Kesari; Reecha Sharma; Saleem Banihani; Edmund Ko; Muhammad Abu-Elmagd; Jaime Gosalvez; Asher Bashiri
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

View more
  1 in total

1.  A global bibliometric and visualized analysis of bacteria-mediated cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jiawei Wang; Mohammed Maniruzzaman
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 8.369

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.