| Literature DB >> 34691208 |
Hongmei Xiao1, Zhibin Zhao1, Cuijuan Zhang2, Jimin Wang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the curative effect of standardized nursing intervention combined with mindfulness stress reduction training in patients with chronic gastritis and gastric ulcer and its influence on negative emotion and quality of life.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34691208 PMCID: PMC8531762 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2131405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The general data between the two groups (%).
| Group | Age (years) | Gender | Course of disease (years) | Education level | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Primary school | Junior high school | High school or above | |||
| Control group ( | 41.39 ± 7.32 | 44 (60.27%) | 29 (39.73%) | 2.57 ± 1.01 | 7 (9.59%) | 30 (41.10%) | 36 (49.32%) |
| Study group ( | 40.81 ± 7.57 | 41 (56.16%) | 32 (43.84%) | 2.52 ± 1.16 | 8 (10.96%) | 33 (45.21%) | 32 (43.84%) |
|
| 0.470 | 0.253 | 0.278 | 0.445 | |||
|
| 0.638 | 0.615 | 0.781 | 0.801 | |||
The nursing efficiency between the two groups (%).
| Group | Cure | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 31 (42.46%) | 27 (3.99%) | 15 (20.55%) | 58 (79.45%) |
| Study group ( | 43 (58.90%) | 24 (32.88%) | 6 (8.22%) | 67 (91.78%) |
|
| 4.505 | |||
|
| 0.034 |
Figure 1The negative emotions between the two groups. Note. Compared with before intervention, P < 0.05; compared with the control group, #P < 0.05.
Figure 2The self-efficacy between the two groups. Note. Compared with before intervention, P < 0.05; compared with the control group, #P < 0.05.
Figure 3The quality of life between the two groups. Note. Compared with before intervention, P < 0.05; compared with the control group, #P < 0.05.
The nursing satisfaction between the two groups (%).
| Group | Very satisfied | Satisfied | Dissatisfied | Total satisfaction rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 29 (39.73%) | 26 (35.61%) | 18 (24.66%) | 55 (75.34%) |
| Study group ( | 40 (54.79%) | 25 (34.25%) | 8 (10.96%) | 65 (89.04%) |
|
| 4.679 | |||
|
| 0.031 |