| Literature DB >> 34690493 |
Jaspreet Kaur1, Prabhpreet Kaur1.
Abstract
From the month of December-19, the outbreak of Coronavirus (COVID-19) triggered several deaths and overstated every aspect of individual health. COVID-19 has been designated as a pandemic by World Health Organization. The circumstances placed serious trouble on every country worldwide, particularly with health arrangements and time-consuming responses. The increase in the positive cases of COVID-19 globally spread every day. The quantity of accessible diagnosing kits is restricted because of complications in detecting the existence of the illness. Fast and correct diagnosis of COVID-19 is a timely requirement for the prevention and controlling of the pandemic through suitable isolation and medicinal treatment. The significance of the present work is to discuss the outline of the deep learning techniques with medical imaging such as outburst prediction, virus transmitted indications, detection and treatment aspects, vaccine availability with remedy research. Abundant image resources of medical imaging as X-rays, Computed Tomography Scans, Magnetic Resonance imaging, formulate deep learning high-quality methods to fight against the pandemic COVID-19. The review presents a comprehensive idea of deep learning and its related applications in healthcare received over the past decade. At the last, some issues and confrontations to control the health crisis and outbreaks have been introduced. The progress in technology has contributed to developing individual's lives. The problems faced by the radiologists during medical imaging techniques and deep learning approaches for diagnosing the COVID-19 infections have been also discussed. © CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain 2021.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34690493 PMCID: PMC8525064 DOI: 10.1007/s11831-021-09667-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Comput Methods Eng ISSN: 1134-3060 Impact factor: 8.171
Fig. 1Spreading of outbreak COVID-19
Modern DL implementation in pandemic COVID-19 image datasets
| Ref | Dataset | Methods applied | Estimation metrics | Research confronts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kermany et al. 2018 [ | Total images = 207 where 130 (OCT) Optical-Coherence Tomography images | Deep network architecture with transfer learning | Occulation: Accuracy = 100% Choroidal neovascularization: Accuracy: 94% Diabetic macular edema Accuracy:91% Pneumonia versus Normal: Accuracy = 92.8% Sensitivity = 93.2% Specificity = 90.1% ROC = 96.8% Bacterial versus Viral Pneumonia Accuracy = 90.7% Sensitivity = 88.6% Specificity = 90.9% ROC = 94% | Collecting image datasets from various resources to make certain employ of planned work not incorporated in the present work |
| Rajaraman et al. 2018 [ | Children Chest X-ray database with (1 to 5 years) | VGG16 Modified CNN Model | Normal versus Pneumonia: Accuracy = 96.2% AUC = 99.3% Precision = 97.7% Recall = 96.2% Specificity = 96.2% F-Score = 97% MCC = 91.8% Bacterial versus viral pneumonia Accuracy = 93.6% AUC = 96.2% Precision = 92% Recall = 99.4% Specificity = 86% F-Score = 95.1% MCC = 86.2% Normal versus Bacterial versus Viral pneumonia: Accuracy = 91.8% AUC = 93.9% Precision = 92% Recall = 90% Specificity = 96% F-Score = 91% MCC = 87.6% | Arbitrary evaluation performed but model’s consistency in lateral form with predicted data not reflected in the work |
| Ozturk et al. 2020 [ | Chest X-ray images | Deep-CNN, Dark-Net, DarkCovid-Net | Accuracy = 98.08% for binary classification Accuracy = 87.02% for multi-classification | Employing the minimal number of coronavirus positive chest X-ray images |
| Ahuja et al. 2020 [ | CT scan images COVID: Training data with augmentation = 1602 Validation data = 76 Testing data = 95 NON-COVID: Training data with augmentation = 2052 Validation data = 97 Testing data = 72 | Deep-Transfer Learning (CNN), ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101 and SqueezeNet | (With Augmentation) Validation = 97.32% Training = 99.82% Testing = 99.4% ResNet18 model AUC = 99.6% Precision = 99% NPV = 100% Specificity = 98.6% F1-Score = 99.5% Accuracy = 99.4% | Less numeral of Coronavirus positive CT-Scan Images used |
Apostolopoulos and Mpesiana 2020 [ | First Dataset: Total Chest X-Ray Images = 1427 where COVID = 224, Bacterial Pneumonia = 700, Normal = 504 Second Dataset: COVID = 224, Bacterial and Viral Pneumonia = 714, Normal = 504 | Transfer learning with CNN models | Sensitivity = 98.66% Specificity = 96.46% Accuracy = 96.78% | More in-depth analysis needs much more positive patient data |
| Fan et al. 2020 [ | Chest CT scan Labelled COVID = 100 Unlabelled COVID = 1600 | Semi-Supervised Segmentation Learning, Inf-Net, CNN | Sensitivity = 87% Specificity = 97.4% Precision = 50% | Due to the limited amount of dataset, Generative Adversarial network (GAN) or Conditional variational autoencoder(CVAE) |
| Ezzat et al. 2020 [ | Chest X-ray Positive COVID-19 = 99 Negative/ Normal = 207 | CNN, Transfer learning, Gravitational Search Algorithm, Hyper-parameters optimization | Accuracy = 98.38% Average Precision = 98.5% Average Recall = 98.5% Average F-Score = 98% | The number of training samples can be increased for better results |
| Wang et al. 2020 [ | CT scan images dataset Total 1266 patients, COVID-19 = 924 Other Pneumonia = 342 | Artificial intelligence with DL framework | For Training: Accuracy = 81.24% Sensitivity = 78.93% Specificity = 89.93% F1-Score = 86.92% AUC = 90% For Validation-2 (Viral) Accuracy = 85% Sensitivity = 79.35% Specificity = 71.43% F1-Score = 90.11% AUC = 86% | Relational Study in genetic, hierarchical samples of CT scan images with epidemiological information not discussed in planned work |
| Shan et al. 2020 [ | Chest CT scan image database with 249 COVID-19 training data and 300 new validation data | Segmentation based DL network as VB-Net, Human-In-The-Loop Scheme | Average dice similarity Index = 91.6% ± 10% Average volume error = 10.7 ± 16.7% | The evaluation of sample metrics as well as launch correlation function between the set of a pattern of disease, handling management not integrated with the study |
| Hemdan et al. 2020 [ | 50 Chest X-rays dataset where 25 are subjected to COVID-19 images | DL Model CNN worked with COVIDX-Net | Precision: 83% Recall = 100% F1-Score = 91% Accuracy = 90% | Huge dataset required to more deep investigation |
Fig. 2Deep Learning applications and techniques
Fig. 3Various Deep learning applications in Medical Image Processing
Evaluation of DL applications in medical imaging practices
| Authors | Dataset | Area | Techniques | Research confronts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shin et al. [ | Dynamic contras-enhanced MRI images | Identify numerous organ illness | Individual-layer SSAE | Inadequate data samples and structure are unsuccessful to be trained more multifaceted features |
| Bai et al. [ | Dataset as short-axis cardiac MRI | Cardiac-image registration | Multi-atlas classification | It needs efficient computational potential |
| Cruz-Roa et al. [ | Total 1417 Medical skin images | Diagnose cancerous cells in images | Classifier as softmax | Expelled implementing large superior Skin data sample |
| Shen et al. [ | Lung image dataset syndicate | Lung-nodule classification | Multi-stage CNN approach | Preliminary trained, as well as the tested dataset, is remarkably dissimilar |
| Xu et al. [ | The Case-Western Reserve University, US | Diagnosis of nuclei in the breast medical images | Stacked sparse auto- encoders (SSAE) | Need to enhance the withdrawal of some features from images |
| Guo et al. [ | The University of Chicago Medical Center | Identification of Prostate | Stacked Sparse Auto- Encoders (SSAE) | Deliberate only 66 prostate images |
| Shin et al. [ | The lung disease dataset with 905 images of 120 patients | Diagnose interspatial Lung ailments | Deep network CNN | Insufficient to contract with hypothetical work on cross-over modality data |
| Ghesu et al. [ | 2891 Ultrasound aortic valve images of 869 patients | Segmentation and detection of the aortic valve | Marginal-space deep neural network | Unsuccessful to direct the computational restraints |
| Baumgartner et al. [ | Total 1003 central-pregnancy scans | Detect fetal abnormality | Automated CNN | Evaluation metrics not estimated with existing methods |
| Payer et al. [ | 895 X-ray images | Efficient response with landmark identification of the Images | Spatial-configuration net architecture | Methods to diminish the intricacy of the model are not discussed |
| Pratt et al. [ | Kaggle database | Detection of diabetic retinopathy | CNN | The model failed to examine complex features |
| Abramoff et al. [ | MESSIDOR standard DR DATASET | Diabetic retinopathy detection | IDX-Diabetic retinopathy V-X2.1 with CNN | Insufficient to maintain trained features by CNN model |
| Kawahara and Hamarneh. [ | Dermofit image library contains 1300 skin images with 10 classes | Skin lesions detection | Multi-scale layered CNN | Debarred uses a large skin data sample |
| Rajpurkar et al. [ | 30,805 patients with 1,12,120 X-ray Images | Radiology-based pneumonia identification | CheX-Net model as CNN | Other performance metrics should be considered |
| Oktay et al. [ | UK-digital heart project, ACDC-17, CETUS-14 datasets | Image segmentation of Cardiac images | Deep Learning CNN | Little slice part resolution |
| Chee and Wu et al. [ | Private MRI image datasets | Affine 3D image registration | Self-Supervised method on 3D medical images | Results lead to limited brain scans using axial visualization |
| Liao et al. [ | Kaggle database | Diagnosis of lung cancer | 3D Neural Network | For minute nodules, it is hard to find highly accurate results |
| Guo et al. [ | The Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Database | Detection of Tumor cells | Deep Network CNN | Analyzed only a single dataset on individual network |
| Seebock et al. [ | Total 226 images with 33 healthy measurement | Retinal OCT segmentation | CNN | Need to be enhancing the version of learning models |
| Elmahdy et al. [ | Erasmus medical (EMC) and Haukeland medical consortium (HMC) datasets | Prostate cancer image registration | Elastix- automated detection of prostate cancer using 3D deformable software with CNN | Methods that define to diminish the intricacy of the framework are not included |
| Zhu et al.[ | Prostate MRI images—81 | Prostate-segmentation | Boundary-weight domain adaptive NN approach | Restricted dataset, model fall to attain examination of complex features |
| Shankar et al. [ | MESSIDOR dataset | Diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus images | Synergic-deep learning model-based classification | Filtering techniques must be introduced during the pre-processing task and “AlexNet” and Inception methods in the enhanced version can improve the Hyperparameters |
| Qiao et al. [ | Retinal fundus images | Diagnosis and prognosis of non-proliferative DR | Deep CNN, gaussian filtering, segmentation | The proposed method can be used to extract the features of texture, scale, form, etc |
| Komatsu et al. [ | Fetal ultrasound images/videos | Diagnosis of cardiac deformities in ultrasound videos | Deep learning | More datasets are needed for testing and validation purposes Proposed work must be obtained on other devices to check robustness It doesn’t hold fetal appearance in any position |
| Pan et al. [ | Total chest CT scan images-465 Moderate CT scan images-319 Severe CT scan images-146 | Diagnosis of COVID-19 in chest CT scans | Deep learning, CNN, Novel COVID-lesions-net | Training and Validations approaches must be obtained from Multi-Centered There must be Gold-Standard access to locate lesion areas |
Fig. 4Deep Learning practices in Medical Image Processing techniques to battle with COVID-19 Epidemic [86]
Fig. 5Example of Chest X-Ray Images a Normal Image b Bacterial Pneumonia Image c Viral Pneumonia Image d COVID-19 Infected Image [87]
Fig. 6Example of CT Scan Images a Normal Image b COVID-19 patient’s Image [88]
Fig. 7Example of a fully connected CNN for detection of COVID-19 in CT scan medical images
Fig. 8Diagrammatic representation of CNN pre-trained models for diagnosis of COVID-19, normal, bacterial, and viral pneumonia
An outline of COVID-19 open-access databases
| Ref | Database Name | Number of patients | Data format | Country | Dataset link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | SIRM (Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology database) | 68 patients | JPEG | Italy | |
| [ | Radiopaedia database | 101 cases | JPEG | Worldwide | |
| [ | MosMed: Chest CT scan database | 1110 cases | NIfTI | Russia | |
| [ | UCSD (University of California San Diego) Chest CT database | 349 CT scans from 216 cases | PNG | Worldwide | |
| [ | COVID-19 ML database | 930 CT scans from 461 cases | JPEG, NIfTI | Worldwide | |
| [ | COVID-19 CT segmentation database 1 | 100 slices from 50 patients | NIfTI | Italy | |
| [ | CT Scan segmentation database 2 | 800 Lung slices from 9 cases | NIfTI | Worldwide | |
| [ | COVID-19 CT Lung slices and infection segmentation | 20 patients | NIfTI | Worldwide | |
| [ | AIforCOVID medical image database | 983 cases | DICOM | Italy | |
| [ | Eurorad dataset | 50 cases | JPEG | Worldwide |
JPEG joint photographic experts group, PNG portable network graphics, NIfTI neuroimaging informatics technology initiatives, DICOM digital imaging and communications in medicine
Overview of DL for medical imaging practices in pandemic COVID-19
| Reference | Category | Tools/Techniques | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahuja et al. [ | Binary classification: COVID-19 and Non-COVID | Transfer Learning-based CNN model | Faster learning process as well as time-complexity able to be accustomed by diminishing various limitations | It must be explored on a huge dataset of COVID Positive CT-Scans of patients. Moreover, the proposed work can be implemented clinically gained CT scan with the virus |
| Fan et al. [ | Multi-classification of lung infections | Semi-Supervised based Segmentation Deep Network | It gives more accurate results with finely segmented boundaries | Inf-Net can also be implemented for directing multi-class tagging of various lung diseases and further can improve the sub-optimal learning performance |
| Ezzat et al. [ | Binary classification: COVID-19 and normal cases | Gravitational Search Optimization based on Hybrid CNN approach | Competitive with Deep Bayes SqueezeNet and gives better outcomes in terms of Precision, and Recall | The number of trained samples can be enlarged to seek better performance for the diagnosis of COVID-19 |
| Hu et al. [ | Multi-classification: COVID-19, CAP (Community-Acquired Pneumonia), and NP (Non-Pneumonia) Binary classification: COVID-19 and Normal cases | Weakly supervised Deep Learning CNN Approach | It achieves high accuracy, precision, and AUC for classification approach and capable qualitative visualization for diagnosis | In this scenario, we have to train the networks on individual images among available samples While training the samples, some noise factors were introduced in the images Time-consuming task |
| Khan et al. [ | Multi-classification: COVID-19, Pneumonia, and Normal cases | “CoroNet”: The Deep Convolution NN Model | It gives better results along with less preprocessing of data | Large patient datasets are needed for in-depth analysis with a DL approach |
| Heidari et al. [ | Multi-classification: COVID-19, other pneumonia infection, and no pneumonia cases | Transfer DL-based Convolution Neural Network | Eliminate irregular regions, better contrast normalization of images towards noise ratio, and validate cases with robustness | Due to the heterogeneity of COVID-19 cases, the robustness and performance of the CAD system are required to be additionally examined. Moreover, new image preprocessing and segmentation techniques were introduced to eliminate diaphragm and outside regions of the lungs accurately |
| Sun et al. [ | Multi-classification between COVID-19 and CAP cases | Adaptive-Feature Selection Guided Deep-Forest for classification approach | It gives the best classification performance and reduces redundancy | This technique can validate on just COVID-19 and CAP classification approach. And pull out handcraft features by using previous information |
| Punn et al. [ | Multi-classification: COVID-19, Pneumonia, and normal cases Binary classification: COVID-19 and Non-COVID | Fine-tuned Deep learning approach with RSNA and NLM (MC) datasets | It performs better results in terms of multi-class classification and robust network which gives rich feature representation | More deep learning and pre-processing techniques were introduced to get better performance |
| Pereira et al. [ | Multi-classification: COVID-19, normal, SARS, MERS, Varicella, Streptococcous, Pneumocystis | Flat and hierarchical classification with several Multi-class classification approaches | The fast and cheap method avoids irresistible healthcare systems as well as gives the best recognition rate | Large samples required with applying sophisticated deep learning approach along with cross-validation method For better results, use hierarchal classification tasks i.e. local classifiers rather than global classifiers |
Comparison with the other state-of-the-art methods for COVID-19 binary and multi-classification
| Authors | Number of cases (COVID-19) | Data Format | Methodology | Two-class accuracy (%) | Three-class accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Narin et al. [ | Total cases = 100 COVID-19 = 50 | X-ray | ResNet50 | 98 | – | 96 |
| Khan et al. [ | Total cases = 221 COVID-19 = 29 | X-ray | Xception | 98.8 | 94.52 | 95 |
| Wang et al. [ | Total cases = 237 COVID-19 = 119 | CT scan | Modified Inception | 82.9 | – | 81 |
| Wang et al. [ | Total cases = 300 COVID-19 = 100 | X-ray | COVID-Net | 96.6 | 93.3 | 91 |
| Song et al. [ | Total cases = 57 COVID-19 = 30 | CT scan | ResNet50 | 86 | – | 79 |
| Ozturk et al. [ | Total cases = 1127 COVID-19 = 127 | X-ray | DarkCOVIDNet | 98.08 | 87.02 | 90.6 |
| Rahimzadeh and Attar [ | Total cases = 11,302 COVID-19 = 31 | X-ray | ResNet50V2 + Xception | 99.5 | 91.4 | 80.53 |
| Apostolopoulos et al. [ | Total case = 1427 COVID-19 = 224 | X-ray | MobileNetV2 | 96.7 | 93.5 | 98.6 |