Muhammad Tariq Rafiq1, Mohamad Shariff Abdul Hamid2, Eliza Hafiz3. 1. Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2. Sports Medicine Department, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ayip@um.edu.my. 3. Sports Centre, Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to investigate the effectiveness of the lower limb rehabilitation protocol (LLRP) combined with mobile health (mHealth) applications on knee pain, mobility, functional activity and activities of daily living (ADL) among knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients who were overweight and obese. METHODS: This study was a single-blind, RCT conducted at Teaching Bay of Rehmatul-Lil-Alameen Post Graduate Institute of Cardiology between February and November 2020. 114 knee OA patients who were overweight and obese were randomly divided by a computer-generated number into the rehabilitation group with mHealth (RGw-mHealth) to receive LLRP + instructions of daily care (IDC) combined with mHealth intervention, rehabilitation group without mHealth (RGwo-mHealth) to receive LLRP + IDC intervention and control group (CG) to receive IDC intervention. All three groups were also provided leaflets explaining about their intervention. The primary outcome measure was knee pain measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. The secondary outcome measures were mobility measured by the Timed up and go (TUG) test, functional activity measured by the patient-specific functional scale (PSFS), and ADL measured by the Katz Index of independence in ADL scores. RESULTS: Among the 114 patients who were randomized (mean age, 53 years), 96 (84%) completed the trial. After 3-months of intervention, patients in all three groups had statistically significant knee pain reduction (RGw-mHealth: 2.54; RGwo-mHealth: 1.47; and CG: 0.37) within groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients in the RGw-mHealth and RGwo-mHealth had statistically significant improvement in mobility, functional activity, and ADL within groups (P < 0.05), but no improvement was noted in the CG (p > 0.05). As indicated in the overall analysis of covariance, there were statistically significant differences in the mean knee pain, mobility, functional activity, and ADL changes between groups after 3-months (p < 0.001). The pairwise between-group comparisons (Bonferroni post hoc analysis) of the knee pain, mobility, functional activity, and ADL scores at 3-months revealed that patients in the RGw-mHealth had significantly higher mean change in the knee pain, TUG test, functional activity, and ADL scores compared to patients in the RGwo-mHealth or CG. CONCLUSION: Reduction in knee pain, improvement in mobility, functional activity, and ADL were more among patients in the RGw-mHealth compared with the RGwo-mHealth or CG. Trial registration National Medical Research Registry: NMRR-20-1094-52911. Date of registration: 05-05-2020. URL: https://www.nmrr.gov.my .
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to investigate the effectiveness of the lower limb rehabilitation protocol (LLRP) combined with mobile health (mHealth) applications on knee pain, mobility, functional activity and activities of daily living (ADL) among knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients who were overweight and obese. METHODS: This study was a single-blind, RCT conducted at Teaching Bay of Rehmatul-Lil-Alameen Post Graduate Institute of Cardiology between February and November 2020. 114 knee OA patients who were overweight and obese were randomly divided by a computer-generated number into the rehabilitation group with mHealth (RGw-mHealth) to receive LLRP + instructions of daily care (IDC) combined with mHealth intervention, rehabilitation group without mHealth (RGwo-mHealth) to receive LLRP + IDC intervention and control group (CG) to receive IDC intervention. All three groups were also provided leaflets explaining about their intervention. The primary outcome measure was knee pain measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. The secondary outcome measures were mobility measured by the Timed up and go (TUG) test, functional activity measured by the patient-specific functional scale (PSFS), and ADL measured by the Katz Index of independence in ADL scores. RESULTS: Among the 114 patients who were randomized (mean age, 53 years), 96 (84%) completed the trial. After 3-months of intervention, patients in all three groups had statistically significant knee pain reduction (RGw-mHealth: 2.54; RGwo-mHealth: 1.47; and CG: 0.37) within groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients in the RGw-mHealth and RGwo-mHealth had statistically significant improvement in mobility, functional activity, and ADL within groups (P < 0.05), but no improvement was noted in the CG (p > 0.05). As indicated in the overall analysis of covariance, there were statistically significant differences in the mean knee pain, mobility, functional activity, and ADL changes between groups after 3-months (p < 0.001). The pairwise between-group comparisons (Bonferroni post hoc analysis) of the knee pain, mobility, functional activity, and ADL scores at 3-months revealed that patients in the RGw-mHealth had significantly higher mean change in the knee pain, TUG test, functional activity, and ADL scores compared to patients in the RGwo-mHealth or CG. CONCLUSION: Reduction in knee pain, improvement in mobility, functional activity, and ADL were more among patients in the RGw-mHealth compared with the RGwo-mHealth or CG. Trial registration National Medical Research Registry: NMRR-20-1094-52911. Date of registration: 05-05-2020. URL: https://www.nmrr.gov.my .
Authors: Charles G Helmick; David T Felson; Reva C Lawrence; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; C Kent Kwoh; Matthew H Liang; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Maureen D Mayes; Peter A Merkel; Stanley R Pillemer; John D Reveille; John H Stone Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-01
Authors: Dean J Wantland; Carmen J Portillo; William L Holzemer; Rob Slaughter; Eva M McGhee Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Kathryn R Martin; Diana Kuh; Tamara B Harris; Jack M Guralnik; David Coggon; Andrew K Wills Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sharon L Kolasinski; Tuhina Neogi; Marc C Hochberg; Carol Oatis; Gordon Guyatt; Joel Block; Leigh Callahan; Cindy Copenhaver; Carole Dodge; David Felson; Kathleen Gellar; William F Harvey; Gillian Hawker; Edward Herzig; C Kent Kwoh; Amanda E Nelson; Jonathan Samuels; Carla Scanzello; Daniel White; Barton Wise; Roy D Altman; Dana DiRenzo; Joann Fontanarosa; Gina Giradi; Mariko Ishimori; Devyani Misra; Amit Aakash Shah; Anna K Shmagel; Louise M Thoma; Marat Turgunbaev; Amy S Turner; James Reston Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 10.995