Sheryl Thorburn1, Olivia J Lindly2. 1. School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, United States. 2. Department of Health Sciences, Northern Arizona University, United States. Electronic address: Olivia.Lindly@nau.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discrimination occurs in health care settings contributing to health inequities. Yet guidance on how best to measure discrimination in health care is still limited. OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) identify and describe the characteristics of published studies that used the Discrimination in Health Care Measure, a scale first published in 2001; (2) review how the measure has been used or adapted and summarize the measure's published psychometric properties and its variations; and (3) summarize associations between the measure and health-related variables. METHODS: We performed a systematic search and review of the measure by searching PsycINFO, PubMed, Sociological Abstracts, and Web of Science from January 1, 2001 through January 31, 2017. We screened 260 unique articles, identified 22 eligible articles, and completed a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Most studies measured race or ethnicity-based discrimination. All studies made minor revisions to the measure, and most reported high reliabilities. Discrimination in health care, using this measure, was associated with adverse health outcomes. DISCUSSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Study results indicate that the measure is easy to use and adapt. Researchers should consider using the Discrimination in Health Care Measure when designing studies that will examine individuals' discriminatory experiences when receiving health care.
BACKGROUND: Discrimination occurs in health care settings contributing to health inequities. Yet guidance on how best to measure discrimination in health care is still limited. OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) identify and describe the characteristics of published studies that used the Discrimination in Health Care Measure, a scale first published in 2001; (2) review how the measure has been used or adapted and summarize the measure's published psychometric properties and its variations; and (3) summarize associations between the measure and health-related variables. METHODS: We performed a systematic search and review of the measure by searching PsycINFO, PubMed, Sociological Abstracts, and Web of Science from January 1, 2001 through January 31, 2017. We screened 260 unique articles, identified 22 eligible articles, and completed a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Most studies measured race or ethnicity-based discrimination. All studies made minor revisions to the measure, and most reported high reliabilities. Discrimination in health care, using this measure, was associated with adverse health outcomes. DISCUSSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Study results indicate that the measure is easy to use and adapt. Researchers should consider using the Discrimination in Health Care Measure when designing studies that will examine individuals' discriminatory experiences when receiving health care.
Authors: Diana J Burgess; Brent C Taylor; Sean Phelan; Michele Spoont; Michelle van Ryn; Leslie R M Hausmann; Tam Do; Howard S Gordon Journal: Appl Psychol Health Well Being Date: 2013-10-04
Authors: Vanessa B Sheppard; Luciane R Cavalli; Chiranjeev Dash; Yasmine M Kanaan; Asma A Dilawari; Sara Horton; Kepher H Makambi Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Larissa Myaskovsky; Kelly H Burkitt; Alison M Lichy; Inger H Ljungberg; Denise C Fyffe; Haishin Ozawa; Galen E Switzer; Michael J Fine; Michael L Boninger Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.966