David Busse1,2, Jens Markus Borghardt3, David Petroff4,5, Alice Pevzner1, Christoph Dorn6, Nahed El-Najjar7, Wilhelm Huisinga8, Hermann Wrigge5,9, Philipp Simon4,10, Charlotte Kloft1. 1. Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 2. Graduate Research Training program PharMetrX, Berlin/Potsdam, Germany. 3. Drug Discovery Sciences, Research DMPK, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany. 4. Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 5. Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 6. University of Regensburg, Institute of Pharmacy, Regensburg, Germany. 7. Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 8. University of Potsdam, Institute of Mathematics, Potsdam, Germany. 9. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy, Bergmannstrost Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany. 10. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
AIMS: The most suitable method for predicting the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in obesity is currently debated. Therefore, multiple GFR/creatinine clearance prediction methods were applied to (morbidly) obese and nonobese patients ranging from moderate renal impairment to glomerular hyperfiltration and their predictions were rated based on observed fosfomycin pharmacokinetics, as this model drug is exclusively eliminated via glomerular filtration. METHODS: The GFR/creatinine clearance predictions via the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD; indexed and de-indexed by body surface area) and creatinine clearance via the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CLCRCG ) using different body size descriptors were compared to the fosfomycin clearance (CLFOF ) from 30 surgical patients (body mass index = 20.1-52.0 kg m-2 ), receiving 8000 mg as intravenous infusion. RESULTS: The concordance between CLFOF and creatinine clearance predictions was highest for CLCRCG employing either ideal body weight or adjusted body weight (if body mass >1.3 ideal body weight; CLCRCG_ABW-Schwartz , concordance-correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval] = 0.474 [0.156; 0.703], CCC) and GFR predictions via the de-indexed MDRD equation (concordance-correlation coefficient = 0.452 [0.137; 0.685]). The proportion of predicted GFR values within ±30% of the observed CLFOF (P30 = 72.3-76.7%) was only marginally lower than the reported P30 in the original CKD-EPI and MDRD publications (P30 = 84.1-90.0%). CONCLUSION: This analysis represents a successful proof-of-concept for evaluating GFR/creatinine clearance prediction methods: Across all body mass index classes CLCRCG_ABW-Schwartz or the de-indexed MDRD were most suitable for predicting creatinine clearance/GFR also in (morbidly) obese, CKD stage <3B individuals in therapeutic use. Their application is proposed in optimising doses for vital therapies in obese patients requiring monitoring of renal function (e.g. methotrexate dosing).
AIMS: The most suitable method for predicting the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in obesity is currently debated. Therefore, multiple GFR/creatinine clearance prediction methods were applied to (morbidly) obese and nonobese patients ranging from moderate renal impairment to glomerular hyperfiltration and their predictions were rated based on observed fosfomycin pharmacokinetics, as this model drug is exclusively eliminated via glomerular filtration. METHODS: The GFR/creatinine clearance predictions via the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD; indexed and de-indexed by body surface area) and creatinine clearance via the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CLCRCG ) using different body size descriptors were compared to the fosfomycin clearance (CLFOF ) from 30 surgical patients (body mass index = 20.1-52.0 kg m-2 ), receiving 8000 mg as intravenous infusion. RESULTS: The concordance between CLFOF and creatinine clearance predictions was highest for CLCRCG employing either ideal body weight or adjusted body weight (if body mass >1.3 ideal body weight; CLCRCG_ABW-Schwartz , concordance-correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval] = 0.474 [0.156; 0.703], CCC) and GFR predictions via the de-indexed MDRD equation (concordance-correlation coefficient = 0.452 [0.137; 0.685]). The proportion of predicted GFR values within ±30% of the observed CLFOF (P30 = 72.3-76.7%) was only marginally lower than the reported P30 in the original CKD-EPI and MDRD publications (P30 = 84.1-90.0%). CONCLUSION: This analysis represents a successful proof-of-concept for evaluating GFR/creatinine clearance prediction methods: Across all body mass index classes CLCRCG_ABW-Schwartz or the de-indexed MDRD were most suitable for predicting creatinine clearance/GFR also in (morbidly) obese, CKD stage <3B individuals in therapeutic use. Their application is proposed in optimising doses for vital therapies in obese patients requiring monitoring of renal function (e.g. methotrexate dosing).
Authors: D Busse; P Simon; D Petroff; N El-Najjar; L Schmitt; D Bindellini; A Dietrich; M Zeitlinger; W Huisinga; R Michelet; H Wrigge; C Kloft Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 5.938