Literature DB >> 34687429

Evaluation of factors predicting loss of benefit provided by laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared to open approach.

Stefano Partelli1,2, Lorenzo Cinelli2, Valentina Andreasi1,2, Paola Maria Vittoria Rancoita3, Nicolò Pecorelli1,2, Domenico Tamburrino1, Stefano Crippa1,2, Massimo Falconi4,5.   

Abstract

Several studies showed safety and feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) as compared to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Patients who underwent LDP or ODP (2015-2019) were included. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the effect of treatment selection bias. Aim of this study was to identify those factors influencing the loss of benefit (defined as a significantly better outcome compared to ODP) after LDP. Overall, 387 patients underwent DP (n = 250 LDP, n = 137 ODP). After PSM, 274 patients (n = 137 LDP, n = 137 ODP) were selected. LDP was associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss (median: 200 mL vs. 250 mL, p < 0.001), decreased wound infection rate (1% vs. 9%, p = 0.044) and shorter time to functional recovery (TFR) (median: 4 days vs. 5 days, p = 0.002). Consequently, TFR > 5 days and blood loss > 250 mL were defined as loss of benefit after LDP. In the LDP group, age > 70 years [Odds Ratio (OR) 2.744, p = 0.022] and duration of surgery > 208 min (OR 2.957, p = 0.019) were predictors of TFR > 5 days and intraoperative blood loss > 250 mL, respectively. No differences in terms of TFR were found between ODP and LDP groups in patients > 70 years (p = 0.102). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the ODP group, also when the analysis was limited to surgical procedures with operative time > 208 min (p = 0.003). In conclusion, LDP seems comparable to ODP in terms of TFR in patients aged > 70 years. This finding could be helpful in the choice of the best surgical approach in elderly patients undergoing potentially challenging DPs.
© 2021. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood loss; Distal pancreatectomy; Elderly; Laparoscopy; Outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34687429     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01194-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  34 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  External validation of the Japanese difficulty scoring system for minimally-invasive distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Tousif Kabir; Ye-Xin Koh; Jin-Yao Teo; Ser-Yee Lee; Juinn-Huar Kam; Peng-Chung Cheow; Prema Raj Jeyaraj; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of omental or falciform ligament wrapping during pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Valentina Andreasi; Stefano Partelli; Stefano Crippa; Gianpaolo Balzano; Domenico Tamburrino; Francesca Muffatti; Giulio Belfiori; Roberto Cirocchi; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Single-Surgeon Learning Curve in 111 Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomies: Does Operative Time Tell the Whole Story?

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Federica Cipriani; Majd Rawashdeh; Susan van Dieren; Salvatore Barbaro; Mahmoud Abuawwad; Jony van Hilst; Martina Fontana; Marc G Besselink; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Takao Ohtsuka; Daisuke Ban; Yoshiharu Nakamura; Yuichi Nagakawa; Minoru Tanabe; Yoshitaka Gotoh; Vittoria Vanessa D M Velasquez; Kohei Nakata; Yatsuka Sahara; Kyoichi Takaori; Goro Honda; Takeyuki Misawa; Manabu Kawai; Hiroki Yamaue; Takanori Morikawa; Tamotsu Kuroki; Yiping Mou; Woo-Jung Lee; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Chung Ngai Tang; Claudius Conrad; Ho-Seong Han; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Horacio J Asbun; David A Kooby; Go Wakabayashi; Tadahiro Takada; Masakazu Yamamoto; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 7.027

6.  Comment on "The Time Has Come to Embrace Continuous Wound Infiltration via Preperitoneal Catheters as Routine Analgesic Therapy in Open Abdominal Surgery".

Authors:  Timothy H Mungroop; Sjors Klompmaker; Bart F Geerts; Denise P Veelo; Markus W Hollmann; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Conversion of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy: Predictors and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Sam C Wang; Matthew R Porembka; Mathew M Augustine; Adam C Yopp; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter; Michael A Choti; Patricio M Polanco
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Treatment of radiation-induced hemorrhagic gastritis with prednisolone: a case report.

Authors:  Lan Zhang; Xiao-Ying Xie; Yan Wang; Yan-Hong Wang; Yi Chen; Zheng-Gang Ren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Which Failed to Achieve Accrual Targets.

Authors:  Riccardo Casadei; Mariacristina Di Marco; Claudio Ricci; Donatella Santini; Carla Serra; Lucia Calculli; Marielda D'Ambra; Alessandra Guido; Antonio Maria Morselli-Labate; Francesco Minni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: better than open?

Authors:  Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranues; Igor Khatkov; Luigi Boni
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.