Literature DB >> 34687343

Variables measured on three-dimensional computed tomography are preferred for predicting the outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.

Masaki Kobayashi1, Yuma Waseda1, Honoka Fuse1, Ryoji Takazawa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is used to treat upper urinary tract stones. Recently, some volume analyzers have enabled preoperative assessment using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). We evaluated the efficacy of 3D-CT variables for predicting the outcomes of SWL.
METHODS: The study population included 193 patients who underwent SWL between November 2014 and August 2020. In addition to conventional two-dimensional computed tomography (2D-CT) assessments, 3D-CT assessments of targeted stones were retrospectively performed, and stone size and stone density (SD) were measured. The successful and unsuccessful treatment groups were compared and risk factors for an unsuccessful first SWL session were investigated. The predictive accuracy of variables measured on 3D-CT was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: The success rate of the first SWL session was 73.1%. Stone volume, mean SD and highest SD on 3D-CT were significantly higher in the unsuccessful group than in the successful group. Stone volume showed a higher area under the curve (AUC) than the estimated volumetric stone burden and stone diameter, which were measured on 2D-CT (0.729, 0.683, and 0.672, respectively). The AUCs of the mean SD and highest SD on 3D-CT were higher than those on 2D-CT (0.699, 0.680, 0.617, and 0.627, respectively). Multivariate analyses identified stone volume (≥ 0.29 ml), mean SD on 3D-CT (≥ 421 HU), and absence of hydronephrosis as independent predictive factors for unsuccessful SWL.
CONCLUSION: 3D-CT variables were promising predictors of the outcomes of SWL. Preoperative 3D-CT assessment is helpful for selecting favorable patients for SWL.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Predictors; Shock wave lithotripsy; Stone density; Stone volume; Three-dimensional computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34687343     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03861-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  22 in total

1.  Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater.

Authors:  Ryoji Takazawa; Sachi Kitayama; Toshihiko Tsujii
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 2.  Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Mahesh Desai; Axel Häcker; Oliver W Hakenberg; Evangelos Liatsikos; Udo Nagele; David Tolley
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Variation Coefficient of Stone Density: A Novel Predictor of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Shimpei Yamashita; Yasuo Kohjimoto; Takashi Iguchi; Satoshi Nishizawa; Akinori Iba; Kazuro Kikkawa; Isao Hara
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Roberto Peschechera; Gianluigi Taverna; Giuseppe Sortino; Luca Cindolo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A nomogram predicting severe adverse events after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: 12  372 patients in a Japanese national series.

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Haruki Kume; Kazuhiko Ohe; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Yukio Homma
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Chronological changes in the epidemiological characteristics of upper urinary tract urolithiasis in Japan.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakamoto; Katsuhito Miyazawa; Takahiro Yasui; Taro Iguchi; Misuzu Fujita; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Takuro Masaki; Toru Hasegawa; Hatsuki Hibi; Takashi Arakawa; Ryosuke Ando; Yoshinari Kato; Noritaka Ishito; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Ryoji Takazawa; Masao Tsujihata; Tadashi Matsuda; Koichiro Akakura; Akira Hata; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.369

8.  Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Hong Seok Park; Mi Kyung Gong; Cheol Yong Yoon; Du Geon Moon; Jun Cheon; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Jae Heon Kim; Dong Hyuk Kang; Doo Yong Chung; Dae Hun Lee; Hae Do Jung; Jong Kyou Kwon; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones.

Authors:  Hemant Goel; Sumit Gahlawat; Malay Kumar Bera; Dilip Kumar Pal; Onam Aggarwal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.