Literature DB >> 34686595

People mistake the internet's knowledge for their own.

Adrian F Ward1.   

Abstract

People frequently search the internet for information. Eight experiments (n = 1,917) provide evidence that when people "Google" for online information, they fail to accurately distinguish between knowledge stored internally-in their own memories-and knowledge stored externally-on the internet. Relative to those using only their own knowledge, people who use Google to answer general knowledge questions are not only more confident in their ability to access external information; they are also more confident in their own ability to think and remember. Moreover, those who use Google predict that they will know more in the future without the help of the internet, an erroneous belief that both indicates misattribution of prior knowledge and highlights a practically important consequence of this misattribution: overconfidence when the internet is no longer available. Although humans have long relied on external knowledge, the misattribution of online knowledge to the self may be facilitated by the swift and seamless interface between internal thought and external information that characterizes online search. Online search is often faster than internal memory search, preventing people from fully recognizing the limitations of their own knowledge. The internet delivers information seamlessly, dovetailing with internal cognitive processes and offering minimal physical cues that might draw attention to its contributions. As a result, people may lose sight of where their own knowledge ends and where the internet's knowledge begins. Thinking with Google may cause people to mistake the internet's knowledge for their own.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attribution; cognition; knowledge; memory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34686595      PMCID: PMC8612631          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2105061118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

Review 1.  Toward a psychology of memory accuracy.

Authors:  A Koriat; M Goldsmith; A Pansky
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Motivated to retrieve: how often are you willing to go back to the well when the well is dry?

Authors:  Michael R Dougherty; J Isaiah Harbison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips.

Authors:  Betsy Sparrow; Jenny Liu; Daniel M Wegner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge.

Authors:  Matthew Fisher; Mariel K Goddu; Frank C Keil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-03-30

5.  Your Understanding Is My Understanding: Evidence for a Community of Knowledge.

Authors:  Steven A Sloman; Nathaniel Rabb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26

6.  Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding.

Authors:  Philip M Fernbach; Todd Rogers; Craig R Fox; Steven A Sloman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-25

7.  Shared intentionality.

Authors:  Michael Tomasello; Malinda Carpenter
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-01

8.  Discerning the Division of Cognitive Labor: An Emerging Understanding of How Knowledge Is Clustered in Other Minds.

Authors:  Frank C Keil; Courtney Stein; Lisa Webb; Van Dyke Billings; Leonid Rozenblit
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-03-01

9.  Older Adults' Use of Online and Offline Sources of Health Information and Constructs of Reliance and Self-Efficacy for Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Amanda K Hall; Jay M Bernhardt; Virginia Dodd
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-06-09

10.  A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Liang Luo; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.