| Literature DB >> 34686203 |
Wanying Chen1, Xiaoyu Zhang2, Yingying Xu3, Zemin Xu4, Haiyan Qin1, Lianbo Zhang5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to explore the clinical therapeutic effects of ultrasound-guided five-point injection of botulinum toxin type A for patients with trapezius hypertrophy.Entities:
Keywords: Botulinum toxin type A; Five-point; Trapezius hypertrophy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34686203 PMCID: PMC8532279 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02758-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Measurement of muscle thickness and labeling of botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) injected points. a, b The muscle thickness was measured by using the ultrasound scanner Esaote MyLab Twice; c the five points at left trapezius muscle for BOTOX administration; d the five points at right trapezius muscle for BOTOX administration
Fig. 2The muscle thicknesses before and after surgery were measured by using the ultrasound scanner
The thicknesses of trapezius muscle on the left and right sides before surgery and after surgery according to the ultrasound scanner
| Patient | Before surgery | 4 weeks | 12 weeks | 20 weeks | 28 weeks | 36 weeks | 44 weeks | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right |
| 1 | 1.39 | 1.31 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 1.15 | 1.26 | 1.21 | 1.28 | 1.23 | 1.29 | 1.25 | 1.31 | 1.26 |
| 2 | 1.13 | 1.22 | 1.02 | 1.10 | 0.96 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.10 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.09 | 1.16 |
| 3 | 1.32 | 1.42 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.23 | 1.33 | 1.29 | 1.38 | 1.29 | 1.38 | 1.30 | 1.39 | 1.31 | 1.40 |
| 4 | 1.26 | 1.29 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 1.13 | 1.11 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.21 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 1.01 | 0.92 | 1.02 | 0.94 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 1.04 |
| 6 | 1.10 | 1.21 | 1.05 | 1.15 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 1.02 | 1.11 | 1.04 | 1.15 | 1.06 | 1.15 | 1.06 | 1.15 |
| 7 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.13 | 1.19 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.11 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 1.25 | 1.19 | 1.25 |
| 8 | 1.24 | 1.20 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 1.09 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 1.13 | 1.17 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.15 |
| 9 | 1.23 | 1.33 | 1.10 | 1.19 | 1.06 | 1.11 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 1.12 | 1.18 | 1.14 | 1.19 | 1.16 | 1.21 |
| 10 | 1.55 | 1.52 | 1.32 | 1.29 | 1.34 | 1.31 | 1.41 | 1.40 | 1.41 | 1.40 | 1.41 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.39 |
| 11 | 1.22 | 1.10 | 1.07 | 0.98 | 1.06 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.02 | 1.10 | 1.03 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 1.12 | 1.03 |
| 12 | 1.44 | 1.30 | 1.21 | 1.16 | 1.10 | 1.05 | 1.25 | 1.19 | 1.34 | 1.26 | 1.36 | 1.26 | 1.36 | 1.26 |
| 13 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 1.12 | 1.10 | 1.14 | 1.12 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 1.23 |
| 14 | 1.39 | 1.35 | 1.31 | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.26 | 1.34 | 1.27 | 1.36 | 1.30 | 1.36 | 1.30 | 1.36 | 1.29 |
| 15 | 1.05 | 1.01 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.91 |
| 16 | 1.24 | 1.10 | 1.02 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.03 | 1.15 | 1.04 | 1.15 | 1.04 |
| 17 | 1.03 | 1.06 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.98 | 1.02 |
| 18 | 1.34 | 1.32 | 1.22 | 1.17 | 1.14 | 1.11 | 1.16 | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.15 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 1.21 |
| 19 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 1.07 | 1.00 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 1.07 |
| 20 | 1.14 | 1.11 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.03 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.10 | 1.09 |
Fig. 3The relative ratios of thicknesses of trapezius muscle at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 20 weeks, 28 weeks, 36 weeks, and 44 weeks after surgery compared with those before surgery
Fig. 4Electromyographic measurements of left and right trapezius muscles before surgery (0 week) and at 12 weeks after surgery
Fig. 5Changes in appearance before surgery (0 week) and at 12 weeks after surgery