| Literature DB >> 34681916 |
Vladimir Maslivetc1, Breana Laguera1, Sunena Chandra1, Ramesh Dasari1, Wesley J Olivier2, Jason A Smith2, Alex C Bissember2, Marco Masi3, Antonio Evidente3, Veronique Mathieu4,5, Alexander Kornienko1.
Abstract
In a search of small molecules active against apoptosis-resistant cancer cells, including glioma, melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer, we previously prepared α,β- and γ,δ-unsaturated ester analogues of polygodial and ophiobolin A, compounds capable of pyrrolylation of primary amines and demonstrating double-digit micromolar antiproliferative potencies in cancer cells. In the current work, we synthesized dimeric and trimeric variants of such compounds in an effort to discover compounds that could crosslink biological primary amine containing targets. We showed that such compounds retain the pyrrolylation ability and possess enhanced single-digit micromolar potencies toward apoptosis-resistant cancer cells. Target identification studies of these interesting compounds are underway.Entities:
Keywords: Wittig reaction; anticancer activity; apoptosis resistance; ophiobolin A; polygodial
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34681916 PMCID: PMC8537666 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(a) Structures of polygodial, Wittig product 1, a proposed mechanism for pyrrole 2 formation involving intermediates I and II, unstable pyrrole 3; (b) Structures of ophiobolin A, Wittig product 4, pyrrole 5 and conjugated phosphatidylethanolamine 6.
Figure 2Dimeric anticancer conjugates of natural products: (a) Melampomagnolide B, its monomeric (8) and dimeric (7) derivatives; (b) Anthramycin, dimer SJG-136 and schematic representation of interstrand cross-link formation through DNA binding.
Figure 3Synthesis of dimeric polygodial-based crosslinking agents 15, 16 and 17.
Figure 4Demonstration of the feasibility of the formation of bis-pyrrole 18 from dimer 15.
Figure 5Synthesis of trimeric polygodial-based crosslinking agent 21.
Figure 6Synthesis of ophiobolin A-based crosslinking agents 22 and 23.
In vitro growth inhibitory effects of cross-linking agents in comparison with their monomeric counterparts.
| Compound | GI50 In Vitro Values (µM) 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistant to Apoptosis | Sensitive to Apoptosis | |||||
| A549 | SKMEL-28 | U373 | MCF7 | Hs683 | B16F10 | |
|
| 30 | 42 | 41 | 36 | 29 | 7 |
|
| 7 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
|
| 17 | 22 | 28 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
|
| 55 | 29 | 79 | 36 | 50 | 24 |
|
| 25 | 24 | 28 | 23 | 17 | 6 |
|
| 59 | 86 | 86 | 43 | 59 | ND |
|
| 5 | 8 | 32 | 8 | 10 | 4 |
|
| 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| cisplatin | 7 | 26 | ND | 35 | 7 | 8 |
1 Mean concentration required to reduce the viability of cells by 50% after a 72 h treatment relative to a control, each experiment performed in sextuplicates, as determined by MTT assay. 2 Data are from ref. [22]. ND = not determined.
Figure 7In vitro videomicroscopic analysis of the anticancer effects of monomeric Wittig products 1 and 4 as well as cross-linking agents 15 and 23. The U373 human glioma cell line was treated with polygodial and ophiobolin A derivatives at their mean GI50 concentrations (Table 1) or left untreated. The experiment was conducted once in triplicate. Scale bars correspond to 100 μm.