Joonhong Jun1,2, Jihyun Baek1,2, Songyi Yang1,2, Hyungwoo Moon1,2, Hyejin Kim1,2, Hyunwook Cho1,2, Jung-Mi Hah1,2. 1. Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Korea. 2. Center for Proteinopathy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Korea.
Abstract
As members of the MAPK family, c-Jun-N-terminal kinases (JNKs) regulate the biological processes of apoptosis. In particular, the isoform JNK3 is expressed explicitly in the brain at high levels and is involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study, we prepared a series of five 6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazoles as JNK3 inhibitors and found them have potential as neuroprotective agents. Following a previous lead scaffold, benzimidazole moiety was modified with various aryl groups and hydroxylation, and the resulting compounds exhibited JNK3 inhibitory activity with improved potency and selectivity. Out of 37 analogues synthesized, (S)-cyclopropyl(3-((4-(2-(2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin -6-yl)-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino) piperidin-1-yl)methanone (35b) demonstrated the highest JNK3 inhibition (IC50 = 9.7 nM), as well as neuroprotective effects against Aβ-induced neuronal cell death. As a protein kinase inhibitor, it also showed excellent selectivity over other protein kinases including isoforms JNK1 (>1000 fold) and JNK2 (-10 fold).
As members of the MAPK family, c-Jun-N-terminal kinases (JNKs) regulate the biological processes of apoptosis. In particular, the isoform JNK3 is expressed explicitly in the brain at high levels and is involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study, we prepared a series of five 6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazoles as JNK3 inhibitors and found them have potential as neuroprotective agents. Following a previous lead scaffold, benzimidazole moiety was modified with various aryl groups and hydroxylation, and the resulting compounds exhibited JNK3 inhibitory activity with improved potency and selectivity. Out of 37 analogues synthesized, (S)-cyclopropyl(3-((4-(2-(2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin -6-yl)-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino) piperidin-1-yl)methanone (35b) demonstrated the highest JNK3 inhibition (IC50 = 9.7 nM), as well as neuroprotective effects against Aβ-induced neuronal cell death. As a protein kinase inhibitor, it also showed excellent selectivity over other protein kinases including isoforms JNK1 (>1000 fold) and JNK2 (-10 fold).
c-Jun N-terminal kinase is a member of a large group of serine/threonine-inducing kinases known as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) [1]. Various stress factors such as oxidative stress, cytokines, and ultraviolet rays can activate the JNK signaling pathway, inducing the apoptotic pathway of cells [2,3,4,5]. Activated JNK promotes the phosphorylation of a variety of transcription factors, most notably the c-Jun component of AP-1 and cellular proteins, particularly those associated with apoptosis (e.g., Bcl2, p53). In addition, JNK genes form different types of isoforms by splicing, and there are three human JNK genes, jnk1, jnk2, and jnk3, which encode ten diverse splice JNK variants (four JNK1/2 isoforms and two JNK3 isoforms) [1]. While JNK1/2 are widely expressed, JNK3 is expressed explicitly in the brain at high levels and in the heart and testes at low levels. Various studies have been conducted on the relationship between JNK3 and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD).In particular, it has been reported that JNK3 phosphorylates and activates amyloid precursor protein (APP), and the phosphorylation of APP results in its location in cell membranes to promote its conversion to amyloid β, resulting in apoptosis of neuron cells. Additionally, the toxicity of oligomeric amyloid β is known to be mainly propagated by reactivation of JNK3 [6]. More convincingly, a dramatic decrease in oligomeric amyloid β and an increase in cognitive ability caused by the removal of jnk3 are observed in mice with familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD). Furthermore, not only in amyloid β pathology, JNK3 also directly phosphorylates Tau protein, facilitating the formation of neurofibrillary tangles, which is positively correlated with cognitive impairment and neuronal loss [7].Three pan-JNK inhibitors, SP600125, AS-602801, and Tanzisertib have been introduced and suggested to target JNK3 in neurodegenerative disease (Figure 1). SP600125 was the first reported potent pan-JNK inhibitor with poor selectivity over other MAPKs, such as p38 and Erk. Studies have showed that SP600125 leads to decreased formation of neurofibrillary tangles and oligomeric amyloid β plaques and improves AD-associated cognitive declines in APPswe/PS 1dE9 double transgenic mice [8]. AS602801 was another pan-JNK inhibitor identified in the process of drug development, but for other diseases. In 2012, this compound reached phase 2 clinical trial studies to evaluate its ability to treat inflammatory endometriosis [9]. Tanzisertib, another potent pan-JNK inhibitor, was investigated for treatment of discoid lupus erythematosus and IPF in clinical trials in 2011, which were terminated at the phase 2 clinical trial stage [10].
Figure 1
Chemical structures of pan-JNK inhibitors investigated in clinical trial.
Even though it has shown its potential as a therapeutic target for AD through many studies, the failure of pan-JNK inhibitors in clinical trials has brought our attention to the development of highly selective JNK3 inhibitors for AD therapeutics [11]. However, all three JNK isoforms have an ATP binding pocket with a highly conserved sequence; thus, few compounds exhibiting high selectivity for JNK3 have been discovered. Due to side effects in response to these selectivity issues, there is increasing interest in finding a JNK3 selective inhibitor.Previously, we have found 1-pyridyl-2-aryl-1H-benzimidazole as a hit from our library and its derivatives that display selectivity and activity for JNK3 through optimization [12]. Based on its co-crystal structures, we continued our efforts to develop new JNK3 inhibitors with better potency and isoform selectivity. During the further optimization, we sought to maintain three interactions of the previous scaffold-JNK3 complex, two hydrogen bonds in the hinge region with Met149, a hydrophobic interaction of the large aromatic ring with residues such as Met148, Val79, Val145, Leu144, Ala91, Ile92, Ile124, and Leu128, and the hydrogen bond of a hydroxyl group in benzimidazole with Asn152. Therefore, we investigated more diverse larger aromatic rings for hydrophobic interaction and additional hydrogen bond moieties on the benzimidazole ring for further SAR. Finally, we obtained 1-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-aryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5, 6-diol derivatives as potent and selective JNK3 inhibitors (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Discovery of JNK3 selective inhibitors from previous lead based on co-crystal structure.
2. Results and Discussion
The synthetic process to 1-(2-(alkylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl)-2-aryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-5- or 6-ol derivatives is shown in Scheme 1. Commercially available starting materials 4- or 5-methoxy-2-nitroaniline (1, 14) were treated first with sodium hydride and then reacted with 4-chloro-2-methylthiopyrimidine to produce 2, 15 [13]. The nitro group was reduced to amine by hydrogenation [14] for benzimidazole formation (4, 17). Various aryl moieties were introduced at the 2-position of the benzimidazole through oxidative cyclization with diaminobenzene and aryl aldehydes (a-g). After formation of the core benzimidazole scaffold, oxidation of the methyl sulphide in the pyrimidyl ring to methyl sulfone (5) was accomplished using mCPBA [15], and several kinds of amino groups were introduced to the pyrimidyl moiety (SNAr) [16] to supply 2-aryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino analogues. When the Boc-protected amino-piperidine group was substituted, deprotection and subsequent acylation were carried out to form products 12 and 25. Finally, demethylation [17] was performed using BBr3 to obtain the final target compounds 13a-p, 26a-p.
Scheme 1
Reagents and reaction condition (i) 60% NaH, DMF, 0 °C to rt, 2 h; (ii) Pd/C, H2, MeOH, rt, 6 h; (iii) ArCHO, Na2S2O5, DMF, mw (120 °C, 150 W, 30 min); (iv) oxone, MeOH:H2O = 1:1, rt, 1 h; (v) NH2R, THF, 60°C, 5 h; (vi) BBr3, DCM, −78 °C to rt, 2 h; (vii) 4N-HCl in 1,4-dioxane, rt, 20 min; (viii) cyclopropanecarbonyl chloride, TEA, THF, 0 °C to rt, 1 h; (ix) BBr3, DCM, −78 °C to rt.
In case of 5, 6-dihydroxy-2-aryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino) piperidin-1-yl derivatives, oxidative cyclization from 1,2-dimethoxy-4,5-dinitrobenzene (28) with aryl aldehydes was accomplished to produce the benzimidazole core, as shown in Scheme 2. Then, 2-aryl benzimidazoles (29) were coupled with 4-chloro-2-(methylthio)pyrimidine using modified Buchwald conditions, and the remaining steps proceeded the same as for Scheme 1 to obtain five additional final products (35a-e).
Scheme 2
Reagents and reaction condition (i) Pd/C, H2, MeOH, rt, 6 h (ii) ArCHO, Na2S2O5, DMF, MW (120 °C, 150 W, 1.5 hr); (iii) 4-Cl-2-(methylthio)pyrimidine, Pd(OAc)2, X-Phos, Cs2CO3, toluene (iv) oxone, MeOH:H2O = 1:1, rt, 1 h; (v) NH2R, THF, 60 °C, 5 h; (vi) 4N-HCl in 1,4-dioxane, rt, 20 min; (viii) cyclopropanecarbonyl chloride, TEA, THF, 0 °C to rt, 1 h; (ix) BBr3, DCM, −78 °C to rt.
All of the monohydroxy-benzimidazole compounds, 9a-9c, 10a-10e, 13a-13g, 22a-22c, 23a-23e, 26a-26g, were evaluated for their inhibitory activity against JNK3, and the data are shown in Table 1. Overall, for aromatic substitutions at position 2 of the benzimidazole, the 6-hydroxybenzimidazole (22a-22c, 23a-23e, 26a-26g) series was more potent than the 5-hydroxybenzimidazole analogues (9a-9c, 10a-10e, 13a-13g). We introduced the hydroxyl group at the 5- or 6-position for hydrogen bonding with Asn152 or Ser193, respectively, based on speculation of the co-crystal structure of a previous lead with JNK3. It seems that other interactions of the inhibitors exert an effect that pulls the inhibitors toward the hinge region with preference of the hydrogen bond between the 6-hydroxyl group and Asn152.
Table 1
JNK3 inhibitory activity (IC50) of compounds 13a–13s, 26a–26s [18].
9, 10, 13
22, 23, 26
No
Ar
R
IC50, (μM)
No
Ar
R
IC50 (μM)
9a
1.477
22a
1.434
10a
0.420
23a
0.045
13a
0.391
26a
0.029
9b
>10
22b
1.546
10b
1.212
23b
0.281
13b
0.679
26b
0.114
9c
4.310
22c
2.194
10c
0.299
23c
0.071
13c
0.287
26c
0.042
10d
0.139
23d
0.110
13d
0.128
26d
0.022
10e
0.799
23e
0.305
13e
0.679
26e
0.100
10f
0.424
23f
0.424
13f
0.161
26f
0.189
13g
0.885
26g
1.130
SP600125
0.0848
Second, we investigated the change in activity with various aromatic substituents (Ar). Larger aryl groups, such as naphthyl and dichlorophenyl, at position 2 of the benzimidazole elicited more potent activity toward JNK3 (a, b, d vs. e, f, g). This effect seems to be related to the electron density and planarity of the aromatic ring due to a Met115 sulphur-π interaction in the active site of JNK3. Compared with mono-substituted phenyl groups, the π-rich dichlorophenyl and naphthyl groups could form a stronger π-π interaction, which might affect the activity as well as selectivity. Nevertheless, even in the case of aromatic groups with hydrophilic substituents (f, g), the maintained activity implies possible polar interactions such as hydrogen bonding.Next, to investigate the effect of the R substituent at the solvent exposure part of the structure, cyclohexyl, pyranyl, and (S)-cyclopropyl(3-methylpiperidin-1-yl)methanone moieties were introduced, and the inhibitory activity was best for (S)-cyclopropyl(3-methylpiperidin-1-yl)methanone throughout the analogues. This result also suggested that the configuration of the amino group in the ring is important for binding, even in the solvent exposure part, for optimal extra-hydrogen bonding. This extra hydrogen bonding seemed more plausible for the (S)-piperidine in docked structures (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Molecular docking model of compound 35b bound with JNK3.
From all these investigations, we decided to synthesize five 6-dihydroxy benzimidazoles with the same solvent exposure group R (35a-35e). As expected, all dihydroxy analogues with five kinds of aromatic ring substituents showed much higher inhibitory activity than the corresponding mono-hydroxy analogue, implying two hydrogen bonds. Moreover, the five compounds were all very selective JNK3 inhibitors when their inhibitory activities toward JNK1 and JNK2 were compared, and the best compound was (S)-cyclopropyl(3-((4-(2-(2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)piperidin-1-yl)methanone (35b), with an IC50 value of 9.7 nM for JNK3 and excellent selectivity over JNK2 and JNK1(Table 2).
Table 2
JNK3 inhibitory activity (IC50)[18] of compounds 35a–35e.
35
No
Ar
R
IC50 (μM)
JNK3
JNK2
JNK1
35a
0.0199
0.266
2.434
35b
0.0097
0.898
>10
35c
0.0209
0.248
2.596
35d
0.0287
0.293
1.228
35e
0.0421
0.508
>10
SP600125
0.0848
0.040
0.040
A docking study was conducted to understand the binding mode of the novel JNK3 inhibitors (Figure 3). When we performed the docking experiment of 35b with a known JNK3 structure (4KKH), we observed many interactions that could contribute to complex stabilization. First, the aminopyrimidine used as the hinge binder formed two hydrogen bonds with Met149 of JNK3, and two additional hydrogen bonds were plausible between the hydroxyl oxygens of 35b with Asn152 or Ser193. Moreover, the cyclopropylcarboxamide group in 35b was in close proximity to Gln155 in the extended hinge region. Lastly, the benzdioxyl ring at position 2 of the benzimidazole fits into the hydrophobic pocket formed by residues Met148, Val79, Val145, Leu144, Ala91, Ile92, Ile124, and Leu128.Next, we performed kinase panel screening in duplicate for compound 35b with over 38 kinases at a single-dose concentration of 1 μM (Table 3 Figure 4). This compound had an inhibitory activity of 90% on JNK3 at a concentration of 1 μM; the inhibition activity was less than 15% for most other kinases, an excellent selectivity profile with only slight activities on JNK2 and GSK3β. On further determination of the IC50 of 35b on GSK3β in comparison with JNK3, the selectivity was more than 600-fold higher (Table 3). Since GSK3β is reported to be associated with neurodegenerative disease caused by neuronal apoptosis [19,20], we can manipulate these characters of 35b for further developments.
Table 3
Enzymatic activities of 35b on selected protein kinases.
Kinase
IC50 (μM)
Selectivity/JNK3
35b
Control
GSK3β
5.85
2.30 (Staurosporine)
>600 fold
JNK3
0.0097
0.0848 (SP600125)
Figure 4
Percentages of enzymatic inhibition exerted by 1 μM of 35b on 38 selected protein kinases24.
To establish whether the derived selective JNK3 inhibitor actually has the ability to protect neurons from amyloid β-induced neuronal cell death, which is known as the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease, we performed cytotoxicity experiments using Aβ 42, which is known as the most toxic fragment of the amyloid protein. The amyloid-β is known to mainly cause apoptosis during cell death, so it was confirmed whether the derived selective JNK3 inhibitors affect the activation (cleavage) of caspase-3, which are apoptosis-related signaling substances. The signaling activation of caspase-3 was confirmed by Western blot and confirmed that the cleaved form, an activated form of caspase-3 was increased when amyloid-β was treated in neurons, and JNK3 inhibitors inhibited the activation of caspase-3 and PARP by amyloid-β treatment (Supplementary Figure S1). This means that selective JNK3 inhibitors can inhibit apoptosis signaling by amyloid-β in neurons, thereby inhibiting apoptosis. Additionally, we confirmed that JNK activation was induced by amyloid-β in neurons, and the derived selective JNK3 inhibitors could inhibit JNK activation induced by amyloid-β. It was confirmed that they inhibit phosphorylation of c-jun induced by amyloid-β in neurons (Supplementary Figure S1). Then, the experiments for JNK3 inhibitors’ effect on the viability of neurons were conducted for five 6-dihydroxy benzimidazoles (35a-35e) by comparing it with previously published resveratrol as a positive control. On the 5th day of rat primary cortical neuron differentiation, each compound was pre-treated for 90 min and then treated with 10 μM Aβ 42 (HIFP-treated) for 24 or 48 h, and cell viability was measured by MTT assay. All 5, 6-dihydroxy benzimidazoles (35a-35e) showed neuroprotective effects against Aβ 42 treated neurons in a concentration-dependent manner (Table 4). The neuroprotective activity of 35b was significantly superior to that of the pan-JNK inhibitor, SP600125, and little less than known resveratrol.
Table 4
Cell viability (%) from Aβ-induced neurotoxicity in primary rat cortical neuron.
Cell Viability
Mean
Δ
Vehicle
60.8 ± 1.3
0
35a
88.9 ± 3.8
28.1
35b
95.7 ± 2.9
34.9
35c
93.4 ± 2.5
32.6
35d
82.2 ± 3.8
21.4
35e
81.0 ± 3.2
20.2
Resveratrol
101.8 ± 1.2
40.9
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Molecular Modelling
Compounds were docked into the JNK3 structure (PDB: 4KKH). Protein and ligand preparations were performed with Schrödinger’s tools using standard settings, and Glide was used for docking and scoring. 3D X-ray protein structures of JNK3 as a complex with ligands were obtained from the PDB (code: 4KKH) and were prepared using the Protein Preparation Wizard of the Schrödinger Maestro program. All water molecules were removed from the structure, and it was selected as a template. The structures of inhibitors were drawn using Chemdraw, and their 3D conformations were generated using the Schrödinger LigPrep program with the OPLS 2005 force field. Molecular docking of compounds into the structure of JNK3 (PDB code: 4KKH) was carried out using Schrodinger Glide (Version 12.7).
3.2. Evaluation of IC50 on JNK3 and Selected Kinase Profiling
We used Reaction Biology Corp.’s Kinase HotSpotSM service (Reaction Biology Corp. Malvern, PA) for IC50 determination of all compounds and kinase profiles. Assay protocol: in a final reaction volume of 25 μL, substrate ATF2 5 μM, ATP 10 μM, and JNK3(h) (5–10 mU) were incubated with 25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 0.02 mM EGTA, 0.66 mg/mL myelin basic protein, 10 mM Mg acetate, and [γ-33P-ATP] (specific activity approx. 500 cpm/pmol, concentration as required). The reaction was initiated by the addition of the Mg-ATP mix. After incubation for 40 min at room temperature, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 5 μL of a 3% phosphoric acid solution. Then, 10 μL of the reaction were spotted onto a P30 filtermat and washed three times for 5 min in 75 mM phosphoric acid and once in methanol prior to drying and scintillation counting. Base reaction buffer: 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.01% Brij35, 0.02 mg/mL BSA, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM DTT, 1% DMSO, Required cofactors are added individually to each kinase reaction. Procedure step-by-step: ① Prepare substrate in freshly prepared base reaction buffer. ② Deliver any required cofactors to the substrate solution above. ③ Deliver indicated kinase into the substrate solution and gently mix. ④ Deliver compounds in 100% DMSO into the kinase reaction mixture by Acoustic technology (Echo550; nanoliter range); incubate for 20 min at room temperature. ⑤ Deliver 33P-ATP into the reaction mixture to initiate the reaction. ⑥ Incubate kinase reaction for 2 h at room temperature. ⑦ Detect kinase activity by P81 filter-binding method.
3.3. Cell Viabolity Assays
In initial experiments, rat hippocampal cells grown in serum-free neurobasal media containing B27 supplements at day 6 were treated with different concentrations of Aβ1–42 or Aβ1–40 for 24 h and then the cell viability was measured by colorimetric MTT assay. Aggregated Aβ1–42 and Aβ1–40 caused up to 40–60% cell death at concentrations ranging from 5 to 20 mM. In this study, resveratrol, an active component from grapes, was shown to concentration-dependently protect against Aβ-induced toxicity in cultured hippocampal neurons. Resveratrol was active against various amyloid-related peptides including Aβ1–42, the most neurotoxic amyloid derivative present in the AD brain. Interestingly, resveratrol was able to block Aβ-induced toxicity not only following a pre- or co-treatment with the toxic peptide, but even to rescue neurons post-Aβ exposure. Primary Rat Cortex Neurons, Sprague Dawley (Gibco, A36512, Fisher Scientific, Göteborg, Sweden), were cultured in Neurobasal™ Plus culture medium (Gibco, A3582901 Fisher Scientific, Göteborg, Sweden), supplemented with B-27™ Supplement (Gibco, A3582801 Fisher Scientific, Göteborg, Sweden) and 0.5 mM GlutaMAX™ Supplement (Gibco, 35050061 Fisher Scientific, Göteborg, Sweden) at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. We plated –2 × 105 live cells per well in a poly-D-lysine/laminin coated 24-well plate. For neural differentiation, half of the medium was replaced with fresh complete medium every third day. On day 6, we removed half the volume of media from the culture plate, added an equal amount of complete culture media containing test compounds or vehicle to each well, and incubated them for 90 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Immediately prior to use, amyloid β-Protein (1–42) (HFIP-treated) (Bachem, 4090148.0100) was dissolved in 1% NH4OH, further diluted with culture medium, and added into the plates to a final concentration of 10 μM. Cells were incubated for 24 h with vehicle control or test compounds in the presence or absence of Aβ42. Cell viability was measured using the MTT [3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay. MTT solution was added into each well at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The absorbance was detected at 540 nm (reference 650 nm) with a microplate reader. All results were normalized to OD values measured from the vehicle control (DMSO).
3.4. Chemistry
All chemicals were of reagent grade and were purchased from Aldrich (USA), TCI (Rep of Korea), Alfa Aesar, Acros. Purification of the compounds by column chromatography was carried out with silica gel 60 (200–300 mesh ASTM, E. Merck, Germany). The quantity of silica gel used was 50–100 times the weight charged on the column. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was run on the silica gel-coated aluminum sheets (silica gel 60 GF254, E. Merck, Germany) and visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light (254 nm). 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Brucker model digital AVANCE III 400 MHz spectrometer at 25 °C using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. High-resolution MS (HR/MS) experiments were conducted with a Q-TOF/Mass spectrometer 6530 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) operated in positive-ion electrospray mode.
3.4.1. Syntheses of 2-Aryl-1-(2-((tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)amino)pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-5-ol (9a-9c, 22a-22c)
After dissolving compound 6a (24 mg, 0.053 mmol) in methylene chloride (0.5 mL), BBr3 (25 μL) was added slowly at −78 °C, and the reaction was stirred for 1 h and then at room temperature for 2 h. After confirming completion of the reaction, MeOH was added to quench the reaction, the organic solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was extracted with methylene chloride and washed with saturated NaHCO3. The extracted organic layer was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated, and purified by preparative chromatography (silica gel, methylene:MeOH = 20:1) to obtain the title compound 9a, 20 mg, yield 86%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.34 (1H, s), 8.45 (1H, s), 8.21 (1H, s), 7.92–8.00 (3H, m), 7.37–7.61 (5H, m), 7.13 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.86 (1H, dd, J = 8.8 Hz, J = 2.0 Hz), 4.78 (1H, brs), 3.00–3.03 (1H, m), 2.60–2.66 (1H, m), 1.96 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz), 1.75–1.78 (1H, m), 1.45 (1H, s), 1.23–1.34 (2H, m), 1.14 (2H, m); HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C26H24N5O2 [M+H]+: 438.1925, found 438.4379.2-(2,3-Dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)-1-(2-((tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)amino) pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-5-ol (9b) as a white solid, yield 36%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 8.17 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.15–7.08 (m, 2H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.35–4.30 (m, 4H), 4.09–4.01 (s, 1H), 3.68 (m, 1H), 2.47–2.34 (m, 2H), 2.28–2.20 (m, 1H), 2.13–1.98 (m, 3H), 1.55 (m, 1H), 1.29 (m, 2H). HRMS (ES+) calcd for C26H24N5O4 [M+H]+: 446.1823, found 446.3474.2-(Benzofuran-5-yl)-1-(2-((tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)amino)pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d] imidazol-5-ol (9c) as a white solid, m.p. yield 93%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.27 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 77.84 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.98–6.93 (m, 2H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.17–4.04 (m, 2H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 3.84–3.77 (m, 1H), 3.72 (m, 2H), 2.24 (m, 1H), 1.98 –1.84 (m, 2H), 1.80 –1.70 (m, 1H); HRMS (ES+) calcd for C24H22N5O3 [M+H]+: 428.1717, found 428.32262-(Naphthalen-2-yl)-1-(2-((tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)amino)pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-6-ol (22a) %); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- d6) δ 9.54 (s, 1H), 8.47 (s, 1H), 8.16 (s, 1H), 7.91–7.97 (m, 3H), 7.39–7.62 (m, 5H), 7.06 (s, 1H), 6.84–6.87 (m, 1H), 3.03–3.07 (m,1H), 2.63–2.67 (m,1H), 1.98 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 1.72–1.75 (m, 1H), 1.46 (s,1H), 1.14–1.24 (m, 2H), 1.02–1.10 (m, 2H); HRMS(ESI) calcd for C26H24N5O2 [M+H]+: 438.1925, found 438.3749.2-(2,3-Dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)-1-(2-((tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)amino) pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-6-ol (22b) 81%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.37 (s, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (s, 1H), 7.01 (s, 1H), 6.97 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.90–6.85 (m, 2H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 4.28 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 4.26 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (m, 2H), 3.62 (s, 1H), 3.39 (s, 1H), 1.29 (m, 4H), 0.91 (m, 3H); HRMS (ES+) calcd for C26H24N5O4 [M+H]+: 446.1823, found 446.2844.2-(Benzofuran-5-yl)-1-(2-((tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)amino)pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-6-ol (22c) 30%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.00 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (m, 2H), 7.61–7.56 (m, 2H), 6.99–6.95 (m, 2H), 6.20 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (m, 2H), 3.99 (s, 1H), 3.86 –3.74 (m, 2H), 2.43–2.34 (m, 1H), 2.14–2.02 (m, 2H), 1.92–1.72 (m, 2H), 1.28 (m, 1H). HRMS (ES+) calcd for C24H22N5O3 [M+H]+: 428.1717, found 428.3226.
3.4.2. Syntheses of 1-(2-(cyclohexylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl)-2-(aryl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-5-ol (10a-10f, 23a-23f)
3.4.4. Syntheses of cyclopropyl(3-((4-(5,6-dihydroxy-2-aryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)piperidin-1-yl)methanone (35)
Compound 34a (0.053 mmol) was dissolved in methylene chloride (0.53 mL), 1 M boron tribromide (25µL) was added at −78 °C, and the reaction was stirred for 1 h and then at room temperature for 2 h. The mixture was quenched with methanol (0.2 mL) at 0 °C and stirred for an additional hour at room temperature. The mixture was diluted with methylene chloride (5 mL) and washed 3 times with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution (3 mL), 2 times with 5 mL of water, and 2 times with 5 mL of saturated sodium chloride solution. The organic phase was dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated in vacuo to obtain a white solid product. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel using a mobile phase of CH2Cl2: MeOH (40:1) to give product 35a (as a yellow solid, 62%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.24 (s, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.93 (m, 3H), 7.61–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.49 (s, 1H), 7.09 (s, 1H), 6.26 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 1H), 3.41 (m, 2H), 3.17 (m, 2H), 2.94 (m, 2H), 1.99 (s, 1H), 1.43 (m, 4H), 0.89–0.66 (m, 4H), 0.57 (m, 1H); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C30H29N6O3 [M+H]+: 521.2296, found 521.0140.(S)-Cyclopropyl(3-((4-(2-(2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)piperidin-1-yl)methanone (35b, as a yellow solid, 42%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 8.30 (s, 1H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (s, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.93–6.85 (m, 1H), 6.20 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (s, 1H), 4.29 (m, 4H), 3.93 (s, 1H), 3.57 (s, 1H), 3.22 (m, 1H), 2.87 (m, 1H), 1.96 (m, 3H), 1.61 (m, 3H), 1.31 (m, 1H), 1.06–0.62 (m, 4H), 0.34 (m, 1H); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C28H28N6O5 [M+H]+: 529.2194, found 529.3455.(S)-(3-((4-(2-(Benzofuran-5-yl)-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)piperidin-1-yl)(cyclopropyl)methanone (35c, as a white solid, 42%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 8.36–8.07 (m, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.56 (m, 2H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (m, 1H), 4.22 (s, 1H), 3.96 (s, 1H), 3.23 (s, 1H), 2.92 (m, 1H), 2.06–1.72 (m, 3H), 1.59 (m, 3H), 1.15 (m, 2H), 0.86 (m, 3H), 0.67–0.20 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOD) δ 174.78 (s), 163.68 (s), 160.94 (s), 156.91 (s), 147.95 (s), 145.89 (d, J = 5.1 Hz), 145.25 (d, J = 6.1 Hz), 141.98 (s), 136.76 (s), 129.30 (s), 126.72 (d, J = 13.7 Hz), 123.61 (s), 112.51 (d, J = 6.1 Hz), 107.93 (s), 104.64 (s), 99.28 (s), 46.97 (s), 31.51 (s), 31.01 (s), 11.92 (d, J = 7.1 Hz), 8.10 (d, J = 17.1 Hz), 7.71 (s); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C28H27N6O4 [M+H]+: 511.2088, found 511.2906.(S)-Cyclopropyl(3-((4-(2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl) pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)piperidin-1-yl)methanone (35d, as a yellow solid, 58%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.16 (s, 1H), 8.44 (d, J = 44.8 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (s, 2H), 7.30 (d, J = 39.1 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (s, 1H), 6.57 (m, 1H), 4.26 (s, 1H), 3.91 (s, 1H), 2.99 (s, 1H), 2.84–2.53 (m, 1H), 2.08–1.86 (m, 1H), 1.66 (m, 2H), 1.51 (m, 2H), 1.23 (m, 3H), 0.88–0.65 (m, 3H), 0.57 (m, 1H), 0.25 (m, 1H); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C26H25Cl2N6O3 [M+H]+: 539.1360, found 541.2558.(S)-Cyclopropyl(3-((4-(2-(4-fluoro-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d] imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)piperidin-1-yl)methanone (35e, as a yellow solid, 60%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 8.36 (d, J = 68.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (s, 1H), 7.48–7.37 (m, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 147.6 Hz, 1H), 6.34 (s, 1H), 4.60 (s, 1H), 4.31–3.82 (s, 2H), 3.13 (m, 1H), 2.76 (m, 1H), 2.06–1.70 (m, 3H), 1.60 (m, 2H), 1.29 (m, 2H), 1.01–0.54 (m, 4H), 0.32 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOD) δ 174.76 (s), 163.74 (s), 162.69 (s), 161.68 (s), 158.97 (s), 146.61 (d, J = 10.4 Hz), 145.64 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 136.83 (s), 136.39 (s), 129.04 (d, J = 14.7 Hz), 118.65 (s), 118.44 (s), 106.24 (s), 104.82 (s), 103.08 (s), 98.83 (s), 50.93 (s), 46.96 (s), 43.93 (s), 31.42 (s), 31.03 (s), 11.85 (s), 7.97 (d, J = 2.6 Hz); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C27H25F4N6O3 [M+H]+: 557.1919, found 557.2937.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, we have successfully synthesized 1-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-aryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5, 6-diol derivatives that were designed as potent JNK3-isoform selective inhibitors from previous lead. Thirty-seven compounds were synthesized and measured for their enzyme activity against JNK3. Particularly, compounds 26a, 26d, 35a–35e showed competitive activities against JNK3 with IC50 values of about 20 nM. The most active series, 35a–35e, especially showed good isoform selectivity. We believe that this novel scaffold, 5, 6-dihydroxy 3-alkyl-2-aryl-1-pyrimidinyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole will be highly useful in the development of JNK3 selective inhibitors, as therapeutic agents for neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, compound 35b, (S)-cyclopropyl(3-((4-(2-(2, 3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)-5, 6-dihydroxy-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)piperidin-1-yl)methanone displayed the most potent inhibitory activity against JNK3, with an IC50 of 9.7 nM and an excellent selectivity profile, especially compared with the activity toward similar protein kinases such as GSK3β, Erk, JNK1, and JNK2. Additionally, 35b showed 95.7% neuroprotection in Aβ-induced primary rat cortical neuronal death, showing a strong potential as a therapeutic in neurodegenerative diseases.
Authors: Richard A Ward; Nicola Colclough; Mairi Challinor; Judit E Debreczeni; Kay Eckersley; Gary Fairley; Lyman Feron; Vikki Flemington; Mark A Graham; Ryan Greenwood; Philip Hopcroft; Tina D Howard; Michael James; Clifford D Jones; Christopher R Jones; Jonathan Renshaw; Karen Roberts; Lindsay Snow; Michael Tonge; Kay Yeung Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: J M Kyriakis; P Banerjee; E Nikolakaki; T Dai; E A Rubie; M F Ahmad; J Avruch; J R Woodgett Journal: Nature Date: 1994-05-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Stephen S Palmer; Melis Altan; Deborah Denis; Enrico Gillio Tos; Jean-Pierre Gotteland; Kevin G Osteen; Kaylon L Bruner-Tran; Selvaraj G Nataraja Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 3.060