| Literature DB >> 34680118 |
Rosaria Acquaviva1, Barbara Tomasello1, Claudia Di Giacomo1, Rosa Santangelo1, Alfonsina La Mantia1, Irina Naletova2, Maria Grazia Sarpietro1, Francesco Castelli1, Giuseppe Antonio Malfa1.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal cancers, particularly colorectal cancer, are mainly influenced by the dietary factor. A diet rich in fruits and vegetables can help to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer thanks to the phenolic compounds, which possess antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic properties. Polyphenols, alongside their well-known antioxidant properties, also show a pro-oxidative potential, which makes it possible to sensitize tumor cells to oxidative stress. HO-1 combined with antioxidant activity, when overexpressed in cancer cells, is involved in tumor progression, and its inhibition is considered a feasible therapeutic strategy in cancer treatment. In this study, the effects of protocatechuic acid (PCA) on the viability of colon cancer cells (CaCo-2), annexin V, LDH release, reactive oxygen species levels, total thiol content, HO-1, γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, and p21 expression were evaluated. PCA induced, in a dose-dependent manner, a significantly reduced cell viability of CaCo-2 by oxidative/antioxidant imbalance. The phenolic acid induced modifications in levels of HO-1, non-proteic thiol groups, γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, reactive oxygen species, and p21. PCA induced a pro-oxidant effect in cancer cells, and the in vitro pro-apoptotic effect on CaCo-2 cells is mediated by the modulation of redox balance and the inhibition of the HO-1 system that led to the activation of p21. Our results suggest that PCA may represent a useful tool in prevention and/or therapy of colon cancer.Entities:
Keywords: CaCo-2; LDH leakage; annexin V; p21; phenolic acids; prooxidants; total thiol groups; γ-GCS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34680118 PMCID: PMC8533287 DOI: 10.3390/biom11101485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Cell viability in CaCo-2 cells untreated and treated for 72 h with PCA at different concentrations (1–500 µM). Values are the mean ± SD of four experiments in triplicate. The results are expressed as the percentage of viable cells relative to untreated control cells, considered as 100% cell viability. * Significant vs. untreated control cells: p < 0.001.
Figure 2Annexin V in CaCo-2 cells untreated and treated for 72 h with PCA at different concentrations (1–250 µM). Values are the mean + SD of four experiments in triplicate. * Significant vs. untreated control cells: p < 0.001.
Figure 3LDH released in CaCo-2 cells untreated and treated for 72 h with PCA at different concentrations (1–250 µM). Values are the mean ± SD of four experiments in triplicate. * Significant vs. untreated control cells: p < 0.001.
Figure 4ROS levels in CaCo-2 cells untreated and treated for 72 h with PCA at different concentrations (1–250 µM). Values are the mean ± SD of four experiments in triplicate. * Significant vs. untreated control cells: p < 0.001.
Figure 5Total thiol groups in CaCo-2 cells untreated and treated for 72 h with PCA at different concentrations (1–250 µM). Values are the mean ± SD of four experiments in triplicate. * Significant vs. untreated control cells: p < 0.001.
Figure 6Immunoblotting of γ-GCS expression (A), HO-1 levels (B), and p21 expression (C) in CaCo-2 cells untreated and treated for 72 h with PCA at different concentrations (1–250 µM). Values are the mean ± SD of four experiments performed in triplicate. * Significant vs. untreated control cells: p < 0.001.