| Literature DB >> 34678895 |
Young Mok Park1, Hyung Il Seo.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: In ampullary adenocarcinoma cases, the clinical effects of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have not yet been well-studied, unlike other prognostic factors that have been reported till date. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in predicting the prognosis of ampullary adenocarcinoma.Thirty-eight patients who underwent pre-operative 18F-FDG PET/CT and curative-intent resection of ampullary adenocarcinoma at Pusan National University Hospital (Pusan, South Korea) between 2008 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. We evaluated the clinicopathologic outcomes according to the SUVmax using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic analysis to arrive at a cutoff value.Lymph node metastasis was detected in 9 patients, and 15 patients experienced a recurrence during the follow-up period. Among 38 patients, 33 showed an increased FDG uptake by the main tumor. SUVmax of 4.55 was selected as a significant independent predictive factor for patient survival along with poor tumor differentiation and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in multivariate analysis (P = .016, hazard ratio = 5.040). Patients with SUVmax under 4.55 exhibited significantly longer overall survival than the rest (<4.55 vs ≥4.55), and the 5-year overall survival was 82.8% versus 57.4% (P = .049).SUVmax of 4.55 on 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a predictive factor for tumor biology and long-term survival in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma. Nevertheless, considering the cost aspect and its limited prognostic effect, this study seems to require more patient and multicenter studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34678895 PMCID: PMC8542133 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma.
| Variables | Number of patients, (% |
| Sex | |
| Male | 21 (55.3) |
| Female | 17 (44.7) |
| Median age (age range), yrs | 64.5 (32–85) |
| Comorbidity | 22 (57.9) |
| Diabetes | 8 |
| Hypertension | 13 |
| Cardiovascular disease | 4 |
| Dementia | 1 |
| Pulmonary disease | 2 |
| Other cancer operation | 2 |
| CEA (range), ng/mL | 2.31 (0.73–24.47) |
| CA19-9 (range), U/mL | 61.01 (0.6–3019) |
| Albumin (range), mg/dL | 3.95 (2.4–4.8) |
| CRP (range), mg/dL | 1.01 (0.05–14.52) |
| T stage | |
| T1 | 14 (36.8) |
| T2 | 10 (26.3) |
| T3 | 14 (36.8) |
| Lymph node metastases | |
| Yes | 8 (21.1) |
| No | 30 (78.9) |
| Tumor size (range), cm | 2.2 (0.5–5.5) |
| Perineural invasion | |
| Yes | 9 (23.7) |
| No | 29 (76.3) |
| Lymphovascular invasion | |
| Yes | 9 (23.7) |
| No | 29 (76.3) |
| Differentiation | |
| Well | 10 (26.3) |
| Moderate | 19 (50.0) |
| Poor | 9 (23.7) |
| Adjuvant treatment | 7 (18.4) |
Figure 1Receiver operating characteristic curve of maximum standardized uptake value distribution with 4.55 as cutoff value, 61.5% sensitivity, and 60.0% specificity.
Figure 2Overall survival according to the metabolic activity based on maximum standardized uptake value of 4.55 and P = .05. SUVmax = maximum standardized uptake value.
Comparison of patient characteristics according to metabolic activity.
| Characteristic | No. | SUVmax < 4.55 n = 20, (%) | SUVmax ≥ 4.55 n = 18, (%) | |
| Age, yrs | .94 | |||
| <65 | 19 | 10 (50.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| ≥65 | 19 | 10 (50.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| Sex | .18 | |||
| Male | 21 | 9 (45.0) | 12 (66.7) | |
| Female | 17 | 11 (55.0) | 6 (33.3) | |
| CEA, ng/mL | .17 | |||
| <5 | 28 | 15 (93.8) | 13 (76.5) | |
| ≥5 | 5 | 1 (20.0) | 4 (27.8) | |
| CA19-9, U/mL | .24 | |||
| <39 | 15 | 9 (52.9) | 6 (33.3) | |
| ≥39 | 20 | 8 (47.1) | 12 (66.7) | |
| Albumin, mg/dL | .19 | |||
| <3.5 | 6 | 4 (52.9) | 2 (11.1) | |
| ≥3.5 | 32 | 16 (47.1) | 16 (88.9) | |
| CRP, mg/dL | 1.00 | |||
| <1.0 | 19 | 10 (50.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| ≥1.0 | 19 | 10 (50.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| GPS | .73 | |||
| 0 | 18 | 10 (50.0) | 8 (44.4) | |
| 1–2 | 20 | 10 (50.0) | 10 (55.6) | |
| mGPS | 1.00 | |||
| 0 | 19 | 10 (50.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| 1–2 | 19 | 10 (50.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| PL ratio | .52 | |||
| <163 | 19 | 11 (55.0) | 8 (44.4) | |
| ≥163 | 19 | 9 (45.0) | 10 (55.6) | |
| NL ratio | .52 | |||
| <3.5 | 22 | 13 (65.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| ≥3.5 | 16 | 7 (35.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| PNL ratio | .05 | |||
| <951 | 21 | 14 (70.0) | 6 (38.9) | |
| ≥951 | 17 | 7 (30.0) | 12 (61.1) | |
| T status | .02 | |||
| 1–2 | 24 | 16 (80.0) | 8 (44.4) | |
| 3 | 14 | 4 (20.0) | 10 (55.6) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | .02 | |||
| <2.2 | 18 | 13 (65.0) | 5 (27.8) | |
| >2.2 | 20 | 7 (35.0) | 13 (72.2) | |
| Node metastasis | .01 | |||
| No | 30 | 19 (95.0) | 11 (61.1) | |
| Yes | 8 | 1 (5.0) | 7 (38.9) | |
| Perineural invasion | .18 | |||
| No | 29 | 17 (85.0) | 12 (66.7) | |
| Yes | 9 | 3 (15.0) | 6 (33.3) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | .04 | |||
| No | 29 | 18 (90.0) | 11 (61.1) | |
| Yes | 9 | 2 (10.0) | 7 (38.9) | |
| Histologic differentiation | .57 | |||
| Well to moderate | 29 | 16 (80.0) | 13 (72.2) | |
| Poor | 9 | 4 (20.0) | 5 (27.8) |
Figure 3(A) Overall survival rates for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 97.3%, 83.3%, and 70.9%, respectively, and (B) disease-free survival rates for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 89.5%, 65.5%, and 62%, respectively.
Analysis of predictive factors for overall and disease-free survival.
| Overall survival | Disease-free survival | |||||||
| Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
| Variables |
|
| HR | 95% CI |
|
| HR | 95% CI |
| Age (≥65 yrs) | .61 | – | – | – | .91 | – | – | – |
| Sex | .70 | – | – | – | .58 | – | – | – |
| Co-morbidities | .39 | – | – | – | .44 | – | – | – |
| Pre-operative biliary drainage | .41 | – | – | – | .60 | – | – | – |
| CEA (≥5, ng/mL) | .92 | – | – | – | .44 | – | – | – |
| CA19-9 (≥39, U/mL) | .32 | – | – | – | .41 | – | – | – |
| Albumin (<3.5, mg/dL) | .83 | – | – | – | .79 | – | – | – |
| CRP (≥1, mg/dL) | .38 | – | – | – | .14 | – | – | – |
| Tumor differentiation (Poor) | .009 | .004 | 6.560 | 1.802–23.86 | .002 | .027 | 3.328 | 1.144–9.678 |
| T stage (≥3) | .009 | .25 | 0.370 | 0.069–1.980 | .01 | .21 | 0.459 | 0.137–1.533 |
| Tumor size (≥2.2, cm) | .18 | – | – | – | .69 | – | – | – |
| Node metastasis | .004 | .36 | 0.371 | 0.045–3.049 | .001 | .45 | 0.541 | 0.109–2.697 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | .004 | .33 | 0.331 | 0.035–3.118 | .001 | .85 | 0.849 | 0.156–4.620 |
| Perineural invasion | .73 | – | – | – | .23 | – | – | – |
| GPS (≥1) | .17 | – | – | – | .06 | – | – | – |
| mGPS (≥1) | .38 | – | – | – | .14 | – | – | – |
| SUVmax (≥4.55) | .049 | .016 | 5.040 | 1.359–18.69 | .48 | – | – | – |
| PL ratio (≥163) | .04 | .50 | 0.371 | 0.021–6.540 | .13 | – | – | – |
| NL ratio (≥3.5) | .002 | .003 | 7.658 | 1.967–29.82 | .002 | .018 | 4.245 | 1.279–14.09 |
| PNL ratio (≥951) | .002 | .62 | 0.544 | 0.050–5.911 | .004 | .50 | 0.563 | 0.106–2.989 |
Clinicopathological features of positron emission tomography negative patients.
| Case | Sex/age (yrs) | Size (cm) | CRP (mg/dL) | Tumor differentiation | TNM stage | Lymphovascular invasion | NL ratio (≥3.5) | Recurrence (mos) | Result (mos) |
| 1 | F/68 | 1.5 | 0.24 | Moderate | T2N0 | – | – | NED | Alive (144) |
| 2 | M/61 | 1.5 | 1.26 | Moderate | T1N0 | – | + | NED | Alive (144) |
| 3 | F/60 | 1.2 | 0.42 | Well | T1N0 | – | – | Locoregional (60) | Dead (111) |
| 4 | F/85 | 2.1 | 9.16 | Poor | T2N0 | – | + | Bone (26) | Dead (28) |
| 5 | F/65 | 2.0 | 0.36 | Well | T1N0 | – | – | NED | Alive (72) |