Literature DB >> 34678207

PBX1-directed stem cell transcriptional program drives tumor progression in myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Sharon Muggeo1, Laura Crisafulli1, Paolo Uva2, Elena Fontana1, Marta Ubezio3, Emanuela Morenghi4, Federico Simone Colombo5, Rosita Rigoni1, Clelia Peano6, Paolo Vezzoni1, Matteo Giovanni Della Porta7, Anna Villa8, Francesca Ficara9.   

Abstract

PBX1 regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells and maintains proto-oncogenic transcriptional pathways in early progenitors. Its increased expression was found in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients bearing the JAK2V617F mutation. To investigate if PBX1 contributes to MPN, and to explore its potential as therapeutic target, we generated the JP mouse strain, in which the human JAK2 mutation is induced in the absence of PBX1. Typical MPN features, such as thrombocythemia and granulocytosis, did not develop without PBX1, while erythrocytosis, initially displayed by JP mice, gradually resolved over time; splenic myeloid metaplasia and in vitro cytokine independent growth were absent upon PBX1 inactivation. The aberrant transcriptome in stem/progenitor cells from the MPN model was reverted by the absence of PBX1, demonstrating that PBX1 controls part of the molecular pathways deregulated by the JAK2V617F mutation. Modulation of the PBX1-driven transcriptional program might represent a novel therapeutic approach.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD61; Emb; HSPC; JAK2V617F; MPN; Pbx1; differentiation; erythrocytosis; hematopoietic stem cells; myeloproliferative neoplasm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34678207      PMCID: PMC8581051          DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Reports        ISSN: 2213-6711            Impact factor:   7.765


Introduction

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are heterogeneous diseases in which platelets and/or mature blood cells of the myelo-erythroid lineage are produced in large excess (Tefferi, 2016) and that can ultimately evolve into acute leukemia. The three main MPN subtypes are polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), often characterized by the somatic V617F mutation in the JAK2 tyrosine kinase, which renders it constitutively active irrespective of cytokine stimulation. JAK2 is considered a phenotypic driver mutation (Nangalia and Green, 2017), although it is not sufficient to explain the heterogeneity of these diseases. Despite MPN being due to hyperproduction of mature cells, JAK2 is present in patients’ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), suggesting that they are targets of the initiating genetic lesion (Mead and Mullally, 2017). PBX1 is a homeodomain transcription factor that binds DNA as a complex with HOX and MEIS/PREP proteins (Longobardi et al., 2014; Moens and Selleri, 2006), and that is involved in chromosomal translocations leading to pediatric pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Nourse et al., 1990). PBX1 is one of the key factors regulating the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in HSCs (Ficara et al., 2008). In addition, PBX1 acts in multipotent and common myeloid progenitors to preserve their pool by temporally restricting proliferation and myeloid differentiation, and to preserve lymphoid and erythroid potential (Ficara et al., 2013). Bioinformatics analysis of gene expression data and experimental evidence revealed that PBX1 maintains proto-oncogenic transcriptional pathways involved in solid tumors and in myelo-proliferative disorders (Ficara et al., 2013; Jung et al., 2016; Wei et al., 2018), conceivably by virtue of its role in inhibiting differentiation in multiple stages of the hematopoietic hierarchy. Indeed, PBX1 copy number variation was found in a subset of MPN patients bearing JAK2 mutation (Rice et al., 2011), and PBX1 is overexpressed in cluster of differentiation (CD) 34+ cells from PV patients (Berkofsky-Fessler et al., 2010). Moreover, Pbx1 is downregulated in murine Jak2-deficient hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) (Akada et al., 2014), suggesting that it is part of JAK2 signaling, and its overexpression in JAK2-mutant HSCs contributes to sustaining an MPN phenotype in vivo (Shepherd et al., 2018). Therefore, we reasoned that an aberrant expression of PBX1 or of its targets might contribute to the establishment or the maintenance of myeloid pre-leukemic clones. To test this hypothesis, we generated a new mouse model by crossing a Pbx1-conditional knockout (Pbx1-cKO) (Ficara et al., 2008) with a known JAK2 MPN model (JAK2-conditional knockin [JAK2-cKI], developed by Li et al., 2010). In JAK2-cKI/Pbx1-cKO mice (hereafter JP for brevity), we can simultaneously activate the human JAK2 mutation and delete Pbx1 in the adult HSC compartment upon polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (pIpC) administration. We demonstrate that PBX1 plays a crucial role in MPN, since its absence modified the course of MPN: our model showed initial JAK2-dependent erythrocytosis that progressively disappeared after conditional PBX1 deletion, and the absence of other MPN-like symptoms. Therefore, PBX1 is essential for the maintenance of the malignant clone, rather than for initiating the disease. We also show that, despite the blood pathology in MPN being mediated by differentiated cells, transcriptional changes already occur at the level of early progenitors. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data confirmed that PBX1 in HSPCs controls part of the molecular pathways deregulated by the JAK2 mutation.

Results

Pbx1 controls part of the MPN signature

We first interrogated the literature to find some in silico evidence of a possible involvement of PBX1 in human MPN. We retrieved a human MPN expression profile from four previously published studies (Berkofsky-Fessler et al., 2010; Guglielmelli et al., 2007; Rampal et al., 2014; Rice et al., 2011), in which data have been obtained either from granulocytes of several PV, PMF, or ET patients, or from CD34+ cells of PV or PMF patients. There is a considerable overlap between the two studies with similar disease subgroup and cell sources (Figures S1A and S1B and Table 1). A PBX1-dependent transcriptional program was obtained from our previously published profiles of Pbx1-cKO HSCs and progenitors (Table S1). When we compared the PBX1 and each MPN signature, we found that a significant proportion of the genes downregulated in the absence of PBX1 are upregulated in MPN patients (Table 1, up to 24.5% overlap). Similarly, a significant proportion of the genes upregulated in the absence of PBX1 are downregulated in CD34+ cells of PV and PMF patients. This is in accordance with the hypothesis that PBX1, directly or indirectly, may control part of the MPN signature. In addition, in the bone marrow (BM) CD34− fraction of five JAK2 patients analyzed, we found a tendency to a higher expression of PBX1 compared with healthy donors, despite PBX1 being a stem cell transcription factor that is expected to be expressed mainly in the CD34+ fraction (Figure S1C).
Table 1

Overlap between MPN and PBX1 signatures

StudySorted cellsMPN subgroupGene set size (DE IN MPN)Common with PBX1 signature (IC DE)ap-value
Rice et al., 2011PB granulocytesPV, ET, PMFUP:76652 (6.8%)b2.6 × 10−9
DOWN:4545 (1.1%)n.s.
Rampal et al., 2014PB granulocytesPV, ET, PMFUP:160894 (5.8%)2.5 × 10−12
DOWN:160616 (1.0%)n.s.
Berkofsky-Fessler et al., 2010BM CD34+PVUP:4912 (24.5%)6.7 × 10−9
DOWN:2439 (3.7%)0.0027
Guglielmelli et al., 2007PB CD34+PMFUP:18525 (13.5%)6.2 × 10−11
DOWN:21112 (5.7%)9.6 × 10−6

The PBX1 signature and the lists of common genes are included in Tables S1 and S3, respectively. IC, inversely correlated. n.s., not significant.

Overlap analysis refers to common and anti-correlated genes.

Percentage values in brackets is calculated on the corresponding MPN DE values.

Overlap between MPN and PBX1 signatures The PBX1 signature and the lists of common genes are included in Tables S1 and S3, respectively. IC, inversely correlated. n.s., not significant. Overlap analysis refers to common and anti-correlated genes. Percentage values in brackets is calculated on the corresponding MPN DE values. These data provided a strong rationale for asking if MPN course might be modified by acting on PBX1 or on its molecular signature.

PBX1 expression in JAK2 HSCs is necessary to sustain MPN

To explore the role of PBX1 in MPN, we undertook a classic genetic approach, by crossing a previously described JAK2 inducible knockin MPN model (Li et al., 2010) with a Pbx1-cKO mouse (Ficara et al., 2008). In the resulting double-mutant JP mouse, the activation of the MPN-driver human heterozygous JAK2 mutation and PBX1 deletion are induced simultaneously by repeated pIpC injections (Figures 1A and 1B). Recombination was always verified at the first peripheral blood (PB) draw (and at necropsy on BM-derived colonies; see also Note S1 and Figure S2).
Figure 1

Generation and analysis of the JP mouse model

(A) Crossing of Mx1Cre.JAK2 (JAK2-cKI) with Pbx1 (Pbx1-cKO) mice generated the double-mutant JP model Mx1Cre.JAK2.Pbx1. Diagram on the left shows the JAK2V617F knockin allele and the activated recombined allele after Cre-mediated excision of the PGK Neo cassette due to the presence of LoxP sites. On the right, LoxP sites surrounding exon 3 of Pbx1 allow the allele recombination resulting in Pbx1 inactivation.

(B) WT, JAK2-cKI, or JP mice, 4–6 weeks old, were administered with pIpC. Starting 4 weeks from last injection, PB was analyzed periodically. At the end of the monitoring period, animals were sacrificed to analyze BM and spleen. CD11b+ cells were purified from PB at the first blood withdrawal.

(C–E) Time course analysis of blood parameters in JAK2-cKI, WT, and JP mice. Results from male and female mice were pooled, see Figure S3 for separate values. (C) Red blood cell (RBC) counts, hematocrit (HCT), and hemoglobin (HGB); (D) platelet (PLT) counts; (E) granulocyte (GRA) counts, with representative week 20 blood smear images on the right. Data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 19–21 individual mice). For each plot, wks on x axis refers to weeks from the last pIpC injection. For each parameter, the entire trend of JAK2-cKI and WT mice is significantly different; p = 0.0001 in (C) and (E), p = 0.03 in (D) (these statistics are not shown within the graph for simplicity). Asterisk (∗) and hash (#) symbols within the graphs indicate p values for each time point. Asterisk refers to the comparison between JP and WT mice, hash to the comparison between JP and JAK2-cKI mice. Images were acquired with an Olympus XC50 camera mounted on a BX51 microscope, using CellF Imaging software. Scale bar within the right panel refers to both images.

(F) Representative images of spleen histology (H&E staining) showing myeloid metaplasia with megakaryocytic hyperplasia in JAK2-cKI mice. Quantification of megakaryocytes (number of Mk/area) is represented in the scatterplot; n = 15–22 individual mice; Kruskal-Wallis test. Scale bar within the upper left panel refers to all three images.

(G) Scatterplot indicating the number of BFU-E generated from 2 × 105 total BM cells in the absence of EPO in the three mouse models; n = 8, 9, and 7 individual WT, JAK2-cKI, and JP mice, respectively; ordinary one-way ANOVA test. In (F) and (G), bars indicate mean ± SD. ∗ and #, p < 0.05; ∗∗ and ##, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ and ###, p < 0.001.

Generation and analysis of the JP mouse model (A) Crossing of Mx1Cre.JAK2 (JAK2-cKI) with Pbx1 (Pbx1-cKO) mice generated the double-mutant JP model Mx1Cre.JAK2.Pbx1. Diagram on the left shows the JAK2V617F knockin allele and the activated recombined allele after Cre-mediated excision of the PGK Neo cassette due to the presence of LoxP sites. On the right, LoxP sites surrounding exon 3 of Pbx1 allow the allele recombination resulting in Pbx1 inactivation. (B) WT, JAK2-cKI, or JP mice, 4–6 weeks old, were administered with pIpC. Starting 4 weeks from last injection, PB was analyzed periodically. At the end of the monitoring period, animals were sacrificed to analyze BM and spleen. CD11b+ cells were purified from PB at the first blood withdrawal. (C–E) Time course analysis of blood parameters in JAK2-cKI, WT, and JP mice. Results from male and female mice were pooled, see Figure S3 for separate values. (C) Red blood cell (RBC) counts, hematocrit (HCT), and hemoglobin (HGB); (D) platelet (PLT) counts; (E) granulocyte (GRA) counts, with representative week 20 blood smear images on the right. Data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 19–21 individual mice). For each plot, wks on x axis refers to weeks from the last pIpC injection. For each parameter, the entire trend of JAK2-cKI and WT mice is significantly different; p = 0.0001 in (C) and (E), p = 0.03 in (D) (these statistics are not shown within the graph for simplicity). Asterisk (∗) and hash (#) symbols within the graphs indicate p values for each time point. Asterisk refers to the comparison between JP and WT mice, hash to the comparison between JP and JAK2-cKI mice. Images were acquired with an Olympus XC50 camera mounted on a BX51 microscope, using CellF Imaging software. Scale bar within the right panel refers to both images. (F) Representative images of spleen histology (H&E staining) showing myeloid metaplasia with megakaryocytic hyperplasia in JAK2-cKI mice. Quantification of megakaryocytes (number of Mk/area) is represented in the scatterplot; n = 15–22 individual mice; Kruskal-Wallis test. Scale bar within the upper left panel refers to all three images. (G) Scatterplot indicating the number of BFU-E generated from 2 × 105 total BM cells in the absence of EPO in the three mouse models; n = 8, 9, and 7 individual WT, JAK2-cKI, and JP mice, respectively; ordinary one-way ANOVA test. In (F) and (G), bars indicate mean ± SD. ∗ and #, p < 0.05; ∗∗ and ##, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ and ###, p < 0.001. We followed the disease kinetics for several weeks in JAK2-cKI and in JP mice, by comparing their blood parameters with those of our cohort of wild-type (WT) and Pbx1-cKO control mice. Starting from 4 weeks after the last pIpC injection, PB was drawn at regular intervals and analyzed by hemocytometer, up to at least 40 weeks from Cre induction. JAK2-cKI mice developed a mild but significant erythrocytosis in both male and female mice, with increased hematocrit, hemoglobin (HGB), and red blood cell counts compared with WT mice, as expected (Figures 1C and S3A). In JP mice, a similar increase in all these parameters was noted up to 12 weeks after pIpC (Figure 1C), despite conditional inactivation of PBX1 alone leading to anemia (Figure S3B). At later time points, however, erythrocytosis was progressively less evident in JP mice, reaching at week 16–20 hematological parameters similar to those of WT mice (Figure 1C). HGB values were even lower than those of WT mice at the latest time points, raising some concern regarding possible development of a mild form of hypochromic anemia in the long run, as suggested by analyzing median corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and MCH concentration (MCHC) values (Figure S3C). JP platelet counts, on the other hand, were similar to or lower than those of WT mice throughout the observation time, including the earliest time points (Figures 1D and S3D), suggesting a prominent role of Pbx1 in platelet development or production, as suggested by the thrombocythemia observed in Pbx1-cKO mice (Figure S3E). The increase in granulocyte counts was also rescued, starting from the first observation times (Figure 1E, left; a representative blood smear is shown on the right), but only up to week 24 and week 8 in male or female mice, respectively (Figure S3F), whereas at later time points the high variability in all experimental groups hampered further evaluations. Overall, the absence of PBX1 rescued the alteration of blood parameters in JAK2-cKI mice. JAK2-cKI and all control mice survived throughout all the observation time, including Pbx1-cKO mice, despite their stem cell defect. Although features of MPN were abrogated in the absence of PBX1, some JP mice succumbed for unknown reasons, with signs of pancytopenia for some of them (Figure S4A). At necropsy, FACS analysis of BM and spleen showed that the proportion of lymphoid (CD19+, CD4+, CD8+) and myeloid (CD11b+) cells was similar in all mice (not shown). Histology data confirmed development of an MPN-like disease in JAK2-cKI mice, which displayed myeloid metaplasia in the spleen, indicated by the presence of megakaryocytic hyperplasia and of excess of myeloid cells (Figure 1F), but not in JP mice or in control animals (Figures 1F and S4B). Quantification of the splenic megakaryocytes revealed a complete normalization of this phenotype in the absence of PBX1 (Figure 1F). Finally, colony assays performed with BM cells derived from mice revealed that the in vitro EPO independent burst forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) growth typical of MPN cells from the JAK2-cKI mouse model (Li et al., 2010) was rescued in the absence of PBX1 (Figure 1G). In conclusion, PBX1-dependant pathways control disease course for at least 40 weeks after the induction of the disease.

PBX1 controls molecular pathways deregulated by the JAK2 mutation in HSPCs

To discover pathways deregulated by the JAK2 mutation that are already affected by Pbx1 at the level of HSPCs, we performed RNA-seq on FACS-sorted Lineage−/cKit+/Sca1+ (LKS) cells from the BM of individual WT, JAK2-cKI, and JP mice several weeks after induction of the JAK2 mutation and/or PBX1 deletion. Transcriptional data on Pbx1-cKO control HSPCs were already available (Ficara et al., 2008) and are included in Table S1. LKS were chosen since they are enriched for HSCs (Figure S4C, top panels), but they also include committed progenitors, thus comprising the cell population(s) that most likely sustain the disease long term; the proportion of LKS within the BM was similar in the three groups of mice, as well as the proportion of HSCs within LKS (Figure S4C, bottom). Principal component analysis (PCA) shows that LKS from JAK2-cKI, WT, and JP mice cluster separately (Figure 2A), indicating intra-group homogeneity and good sample resolution among the three conditions. Differential expression analysis revealed that 269 and 628 genes were differentially expressed (DE) at false discovery rate <0.05 in JAK2-cKI and in JP mice compared with WT, respectively (Figure 2B and Table S2). There was only a minimal overlap between the two gene sets (Figure 2B), indicating that the expression level of the vast majority of the genes DE in MPN-affected mice compared with WT was rescued by the absence of PBX1, since they were no longer DE in JP mice compared with WT. Of the 14 common genes, nine changed discordantly in the two gene sets: four were upregulated in JAK2-cKI but downregulated in JP mice, mostly involved in vesicular trafficking, and five were downregulated in JAK2-cKI but upregulated in JP mice (Table S2).
Figure 2

RNA-seq to discover molecular pathways deregulated in absence of PBX1

(A) PCA of JAK2-cKI, JP, and WT LKS (red, blue, and black, respectively).

(B) Hierarchical cluster dendrogram showing the relative expression of DE transcripts in JAK2-cKI LKS compared with WT (left) and in JP LKS compared with WT (right). Venn diagram shows the overlap of deregulated genes in the two analyses. The color scale represents Z score transformed signal intensity.

(C) Heatmap showing the enrichment score (minimum, −10; maximum, 10) from gene set enrichment analysis in the indicated categories for each gene set compared with WT.

(D) Venn diagrams showing overlaps among genes downregulated (left) and upregulated (right) in both JP and Pbx1-cKO HSPCs.

(E) Venn diagram showing overlap among genes downregulated in JP LKS and genes upregulated in MEP from VF mice, a transgenic MPN model with Jak2 mutation described in Rao et al. (2019).

RNA-seq to discover molecular pathways deregulated in absence of PBX1 (A) PCA of JAK2-cKI, JP, and WT LKS (red, blue, and black, respectively). (B) Hierarchical cluster dendrogram showing the relative expression of DE transcripts in JAK2-cKI LKS compared with WT (left) and in JP LKS compared with WT (right). Venn diagram shows the overlap of deregulated genes in the two analyses. The color scale represents Z score transformed signal intensity. (C) Heatmap showing the enrichment score (minimum, −10; maximum, 10) from gene set enrichment analysis in the indicated categories for each gene set compared with WT. (D) Venn diagrams showing overlaps among genes downregulated (left) and upregulated (right) in both JP and Pbx1-cKO HSPCs. (E) Venn diagram showing overlap among genes downregulated in JP LKS and genes upregulated in MEP from VF mice, a transgenic MPN model with Jak2 mutation described in Rao et al. (2019). Genes downregulated in LKS from JAK2-cKI mice compared with WT were enriched for several metabolic processes (Figure 2C, bottom). A misregulation of genes involved in metabolism in megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors (MEPs) has been described (Rao et al., 2019), and we here show that similar alterations are already present at the level of uncommitted cells in JAK2-cKI, but not in JP mice. Genes upregulated in LKS from JAK2-cKI mice compared with WT were enriched for several gene families and pathways involved in MPN pathogenesis, including receptor tyrosine kinases, extracellular matrix, cytokine binding, platelet activation, and for previously published gene sets related to lipids. The same gene families and pathways were enriched in the list of genes downregulated in LKS from JP mice (Figure 2C, top), suggesting that their expression in LKS from MPN-affected mice is dependent on Pbx1. Among genes DE in JP LKS compared with WT, we also found a significant overlap with the PBX1 signature (Figure 2D), indicating that at least part of the expression profile of the JP mice is the result of the absence of PBX1 per se, regardless of the JAK2 unregulated expression. Downregulated overlapping transcripts are mainly involved in calcium binding, HSC maintenance, cancer, and platelet development/function (Table S3), in line with our current experimental data; upregulated genes play roles in inflammation and in the innate immune system, as expected from Pbx1-cKO mice. However, most of the non-overlapping DE genes likely change their expression level as the result of the concomitant JAK2 constitutive expression and PBX1 absence. Of note, 32.5% of the genes downregulated in JP LKS (including Pbx1) are upregulated in MEP from a similar murine MPN model (Rao et al., 2019) (Figure 2E; Table S3), despite PBX1 not normally being expressed in MEP (Figure S4D), indicating that, by deleting Pbx1 in HSCs constitutively expressing JAK2, a portion of the genes contributing to MPN acting in committed progenitors are already repressed in LKS. Sixteen percent of the overlapping genes are also overexpressed in human MPN (Table S3). We validated part of RNA-seq data with real-time PCR or FACS analysis (Figures 3A–3C). We confirmed elevated expression of KLF6 (a transcriptional activator), of NAAA (involved in fatty acid metabolism), BTG2 (correlated to terminal differentiation), and CCR2 (a chemokine receptor) in JAK2-cKI LKS compared with WT (Figure 3A, left panels). Genes confirmed to be downregulated in JP LKS included MLLT3 and ALDH1A1 (HSC stemness), ADGRE5 (CD97, regulator of leukemia stem cell function), MMRN1, and ITGB3 (CD61,platelet function) (Figure 3A, right panels, and Figure 3B). Downregulation of CD61 was confirmed at the protein level on both LKS and HSCs (Figure 3B, left). FACS analysis revealed the presence of CD61 high- and CD61 low-expressing LKS cells (Figure 3B, right), with JP LKS showing a reduced proportion of the CD61-high fraction and a concomitant increase of the CD61-low fraction compared with JAK2-cKI and WT mice. Among genes upregulated in JP versus WT LKS, we tested CFS1R (CD115), MPO, DHRS3 (all normally expressed in myeloid cells) and Embigin (EMB; a cell adhesion molecule), which we also confirmed at the protein level (Figure 3C). Interestingly, FACS analysis of WT BM cells revealed an expression pattern that suggests EMB as a novel myeloid differentiation marker (Figure 3D). EMB was recently included among HSC regulators since its expression in the BM microenvironment promotes HSC homing (Silberstein et al., 2016); however, its function within HSPCs has not been dissected out. To gain insight into EMB’s role within early progenitors, we sorted LKS cells and incubated them with an anti-EMB (αE)-blocking antibody (Ab) (Silberstein et al., 2016) in short-term culture. After 3 days, the proportion of cells that had acquired the CD11b myeloid marker was lower in cells treated with the αE Ab compared with isotype control (Figure 3E), suggesting that EMB downregulation prevents myeloid differentiation and that its overexpression in JP LKS, together with CFS1R and MPO, likely favors the myeloid lineage at the expenses of erythroid and MK lineages.
Figure 3

Validation of RNA-seq data

(A) Scatterplots showing real-time PCR data for the indicated genes expressed in arbitrary units (AU).

(B) FACS analysis showing CD61 expression in BM LKS and HSCs of pIpC-treated JAK2-cKI, JP, and WT mice. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. Representative overlay histograms indicating CD61-high and -low gates are shown.

(C) Left: real-time PCR data for genes upregulated in JP mice. Right: EMB expression in BM LKS cells of JAK2-cKI, JP, and WT mice measured by FACS. (B–C) FACS histograms in gray: unstained control.

(D) EMB protein level in erythroid (Ery), lymphoid (Ly), myeloid (My) (all gated based on scatters), and LKS cells in the BM of WT mice; a representative FACS analysis is shown on the left (dotted line: unstained). (A–D) Ordinary one-way ANOVA.

(E) Percentage of cells expressing CD11b after 3 days of liquid culture of LKS cells treated with αE or isotype control (IC); representative FACS contour plots of a JP sample are shown; paired t test.

For all bar graphs, bars indicate mean ± SD. ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01, ∗∗∗, p < 0.001.

Validation of RNA-seq data (A) Scatterplots showing real-time PCR data for the indicated genes expressed in arbitrary units (AU). (B) FACS analysis showing CD61 expression in BM LKS and HSCs of pIpC-treated JAK2-cKI, JP, and WT mice. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. Representative overlay histograms indicating CD61-high and -low gates are shown. (C) Left: real-time PCR data for genes upregulated in JP mice. Right: EMB expression in BM LKS cells of JAK2-cKI, JP, and WT mice measured by FACS. (B–C) FACS histograms in gray: unstained control. (D) EMB protein level in erythroid (Ery), lymphoid (Ly), myeloid (My) (all gated based on scatters), and LKS cells in the BM of WT mice; a representative FACS analysis is shown on the left (dotted line: unstained). (A–D) Ordinary one-way ANOVA. (E) Percentage of cells expressing CD11b after 3 days of liquid culture of LKS cells treated with αE or isotype control (IC); representative FACS contour plots of a JP sample are shown; paired t test. For all bar graphs, bars indicate mean ± SD. ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01, ∗∗∗, p < 0.001. In conclusion, despite the blood pathology in MPN being mediated by differentiated cells, several molecular pathways are already deregulated in HSPCs. Transcriptional profiling data suggest that most of them are directly or indirectly under the control of PBX1. Our lists of DE genes provide a tool to select new therapeutic targets.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate an essential role for PBX1 in determining the course of JAK2 MPN through the analysis of a mouse model of the disease. Our data indicate that, despite the mutation in JAK2, thrombocytosis and granulocytosis do not develop in the absence of PBX1, in accordance with the high level of expression of PBX1 in the progenitors of these lineages in normal conditions (Seita et al., 2012) and with the low number of platelets in Pbx1-cKO mice; importantly, we also show that erythrocytosis normalizes after a few weeks in JP mice. We confirm that PBX1 sustains the expression of transcriptional programs that control HSC maintenance and platelet development, and prevent myeloid skewing, all relevant for MPN onset, and we show that, in combination with mutated JAK2, PBX1 contributes to regulate signaling and metabolic pathways that are key for MPN and that are already active in primitive progenitors. Conditional inactivation of PBX1 alone led to anemia, likely due to the known PBX1 role in preserving HSC functions and erythroid potential. Nevertheless, this property does not affect disease development during the first weeks after pIpC injection, underlying the prominent role of JAK2 signaling in promoting proliferation, survival, and differentiation of erythroid progenitors, despite PBX1 absence. However, our data suggest that, to fuel the disease, proper HSC functionality, including long-term self-renewal, must be maintained over time. Whether similar conclusions could be drawn by deleting other genes that maintain fitness of HSCs is worth investigating. Since PBX1 must be expressed to sustain the disease, we propose that acting on PBX1, or on pathways downstream of it, might represent an option for a long-term cure of MPN, to complement the action of conventional therapies or of more recent treatments based on JAK inhibitors (Vannucchi and Harrison, 2017). Modulation of PBX1 activity by direct targeting or by targeting its downstream mediators might represent a novel therapeutic approach that likely hits MPN stem cells rather than the bulk of the disease. Small molecules targeting PBX1 have been developed and tested in cancer models (Morgan et al., 2012; Platais et al., 2018; Shen et al., 2018, 2019), and selective toxicity for neoplastic cells has been demonstrated in vitro (Liu et al., 2019); moreover, their therapeutic potential has been proposed for several types of tumors (Morgan et al., 2012). However, the high number of genes DE in JP LKS compared with WT, and the fact that some JP mice died likely of ineffective hematopoiesis, suggest some caution before considering PBX1 inhibition in patients. Our approach of genetic inactivation as a proof of principle is very different from a pharmacologic approach, which would include dosage studies and would likely not reach a total abrogation of PBX1 activity. However, we also encourage the development of alternative or complementary strategies that target some of the druggable genes and pathways described here that are subordinated to PBX1 in the presence of mutated JAK2. Moreover, whether PBX1 could represent a novel prognostic factor is worth investigating, with the aim of further stratifying these heterogeneous patients and personalizing their therapeutic approach.

Experimental procedures

Murine models

Mx1Cre+.JAK2 and Mx1Cre+.Pbx1 mice have been described (Crisafulli et al., 2019; Koss et al., 2012; Li et al., 2010); see also supplemental experimental procedures. Primers used for genotyping are listed in Table S4.

Induction of JAK2 expression and Pbx1 deletion

Three- to 6-week-old mice were treated with 10 mg/kg pIpC (high molecular weight, InvivoGen) by intraperitoneal injection (seven doses, every other day). A detailed description is provided in supplemental experimental procedures.

Histological and FACS analysis

A detailed description is provided in supplemental experimental procedures. Monoclonal antibodies are listed in Table S4.

Colony-forming unit assay

To evaluate erythropoietin (EPO) independency, colony-forming unit (CFU) assay was performed from BM cells using the CAMEO-4 Kit (Preferred Cell Systems) as previously described (Li et al., 2010), with and without 3 U/mL h-EPO (R&D). See also supplemental experimental procedures.

RNA-seq and bioinformatic analysis

Total RNA was extracted with Direct-zol RNA Microprep kit (Zymo Research) from 5 × 104 LKS sorted from the BM of pIpC-treated JAK2-cKI, JP, and WT control mice (3–4 biological replicates/group). A detailed description is provided in supplemental experimental procedures.

Statistics

For time course analysis of blood parameters, data were compared using ANOVA for repeated measures when considering the entire curve, or with one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's multiple comparison test when comparing individual time points. For all other multiple comparisons, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons test was used if normality test was not passed, or ordinary one-way ANOVA if data followed a normal distribution. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (∗ and #p < 0.05, ∗∗ and ##p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ and ###p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software) or with Stata15 (StataCorp LLC).

Data and code availability

The accession number for the RNA-seq data reported in this paper is GEO: GSE153482.

Author contributions

S.M. and L.C. conducted experiments; acquired, analyzed, and interpreted data; and wrote the manuscript. E.F., F.S.C., and R.R. conducted experiments. M.U. and M.G.D.P. provided patient samples and interpreted data. P.U. conducted bioinformatics analysis. E.M. analyzed data. C.P. was responsible for the RNA-seq. F.F. designed and directed research, oversaw data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. P.V. and A.V. supervised research and edited the manuscript.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
  27 in total

1.  Molecular profiling of CD34+ cells in idiopathic myelofibrosis identifies a set of disease-associated genes and reveals the clinical significance of Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1).

Authors:  Paola Guglielmelli; Roberta Zini; Costanza Bogani; Simona Salati; Alessandro Pancrazzi; Elisa Bianchi; Francesco Mannelli; Sergio Ferrari; Marie-Caroline Le Bousse-Kerdilès; Alberto Bosi; Giovanni Barosi; Anna Rita Migliaccio; Rossella Manfredini; Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 2.  Myeloproliferative neoplasm stem cells.

Authors:  Adam J Mead; Ann Mullally
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Inhibition of the deubiquitinase USP9x induces pre-B cell homeobox 1 (PBX1) degradation and thereby stimulates prostate cancer cell apoptosis.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Xiaofeng Xu; Peng Lin; Yuanming He; Yawen Zhang; Biyin Cao; Zubin Zhang; Gautam Sethi; Jinbao Liu; Xiumin Zhou; Xinliang Mao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Targeting the HOX/PBX dimer in breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard Morgan; Angie Boxall; Kevin J Harrington; Guy R Simpson; Cheryl Gillett; Agnieszka Michael; Hardev S Pandha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Ovarian Cancer Chemoresistance Relies on the Stem Cell Reprogramming Factor PBX1.

Authors:  Jin-Gyoung Jung; Ie-Ming Shih; Joon Tae Park; Emily Gerry; Tae Hoen Kim; Ayse Ayhan; Karen Handschuh; Ben Davidson; Amanda N Fader; Licia Selleri; Tian-Li Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Emerging treatments for classical myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Alessandro M Vannucchi; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Myeloproliferative neoplasms: A decade of discoveries and treatment advances.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 10.047

8.  Chromosomal translocation t(1;19) results in synthesis of a homeobox fusion mRNA that codes for a potential chimeric transcription factor.

Authors:  J Nourse; J D Mellentin; N Galili; J Wilkinson; E Stanbridge; S D Smith; M L Cleary
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Analysis of genomic aberrations and gene expression profiling identifies novel lesions and pathways in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  K L Rice; X Lin; K Wolniak; B L Ebert; W Berkofsky-Fessler; M Buzzai; Y Sun; C Xi; P Elkin; R Levine; T Golub; D G Gilliland; J D Crispino; J D Licht; W Zhang
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  Single-cell approaches identify the molecular network driving malignant hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Mairi S Shepherd; Juan Li; Nicola K Wilson; Caroline A Oedekoven; Jiangbing Li; Miriam Belmonte; Juergen Fink; Janine C M Prick; Dean C Pask; Tina L Hamilton; Dirk Loeffler; Anjana Rao; Timm Schröder; Berthold Göttgens; Anthony R Green; David G Kent
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Bone Marrow Niches and Tumour Cells: Lights and Shadows of a Mutual Relationship.

Authors:  Valentina Granata; Laura Crisafulli; Claudia Nastasi; Francesca Ficara; Cristina Sobacchi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 8.786

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.