PURPOSE: The literature concerning the effects of scoliosis correction on pulmonary function (PF) is scarce and solely related to spinal fusion. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) represents a new option for scoliosis correction; however, its effects on PF have not yet been investigated. As VBT is a fusion-less technique that does not limit the dynamics of the chest wall, it is expected not to have a negative impact on PF despite the anterior surgical approach. METHODS: We analyzed the PF preoperatively and compared it with the PF at 6-weeks, 6-months and 12-monthts postoperatively. Considered parameters were total lung capacity (TLC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) expressed as percentages. A change of more than 10% was considered clinically significant. RESULTS: Before VBT, overall TLC, FEV1 and FVC measured 98 ± 15%, 85 ± 16% and 91 ± 17%, respectively. Six weeks after surgery, all parameters were comparable to the preoperative values (TLC 96 ± 17%, FEV1 84 ± 14%, FVC 90 ± 16%) and remained so at the last follow-up (TLC 99 ± 15%, FEV1 89 ± 9%, FVC 86 ± 9). While a reduction in FEV1 and FVC was observed at 6-weeks and 6-months in patients with thoracic or double curves compared to thoracolumbar curves, no significant differences were observed at the 12-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: VBT does not cause a reduction in PF values at a short-term follow-up.
PURPOSE: The literature concerning the effects of scoliosis correction on pulmonary function (PF) is scarce and solely related to spinal fusion. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) represents a new option for scoliosis correction; however, its effects on PF have not yet been investigated. As VBT is a fusion-less technique that does not limit the dynamics of the chest wall, it is expected not to have a negative impact on PF despite the anterior surgical approach. METHODS: We analyzed the PF preoperatively and compared it with the PF at 6-weeks, 6-months and 12-monthts postoperatively. Considered parameters were total lung capacity (TLC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) expressed as percentages. A change of more than 10% was considered clinically significant. RESULTS: Before VBT, overall TLC, FEV1 and FVC measured 98 ± 15%, 85 ± 16% and 91 ± 17%, respectively. Six weeks after surgery, all parameters were comparable to the preoperative values (TLC 96 ± 17%, FEV1 84 ± 14%, FVC 90 ± 16%) and remained so at the last follow-up (TLC 99 ± 15%, FEV1 89 ± 9%, FVC 86 ± 9). While a reduction in FEV1 and FVC was observed at 6-weeks and 6-months in patients with thoracic or double curves compared to thoracolumbar curves, no significant differences were observed at the 12-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: VBT does not cause a reduction in PF values at a short-term follow-up.
Authors: Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Gene Cheh; Brenda Sides; Joetta Whorton Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Yevgeniy Gitelman; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Joshua D Auerbach; Brenda A Sides Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Frances D Faro; Michelle C Marks; Peter O Newton; Kathy Blanke; Lawrence G Lenke Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Kushagra Verma; Baron S Lonner; Kristin E Kean; Laura E Dean; Antonio Valdevit Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Gene Cheh; Joetta Whorton; Brenda Sides Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Lawrence G Lenke; Deborah K White; James S Kemp; Keith H Bridwell; Kathy M Blanke; Jack R Engsberg Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468