BACKGROUND: Due to variable absorption and extensive first-pass metabolism, the bioavailability of oral delta-9-tetra-hydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) is low, and, therefore, alternative application forms are necessary. METHODS: In an open-label, 2-period phase-1 study on 11 healthy volunteers, a combination of THC and CBD was compared by pulmonary (inh) and intravenous (iv) application. The liquid aerosol was produced by an in vitro validated pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) device, releasing 41-44% of the cannabinoid dose, enabling a dosage of 81 µg THC and 87 µg CBD per actuation. Three subjects (pilot trial, low-dose session) received 324 and 348 μg THC and CBD, respectively, and 8 subjects (main trial, high-dose session) received 648 and 696 µg THC and CBD, respectively. The addition of the local anesthetic lidocaine to the inh preparation should prevent airways irritation and coughing. The pharmacokinetic evaluation was based on plasma profiles acquired by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Adverse effects were monitored by visual analog scales and measuring vital functions. RESULTS: After low inh doses, THC and CBD were not measurable in plasma longer than 20 and 40 min after administration, respectively. Therefore, only plasma levels resulting after high doses were further evaluated. After inh and iv administration, THC plasma peaks were observed 5 min post-drug, with THC peak concentrations ranging from 3 to 22 and from 13 to 40 ng/mL, respectively. CBD peaks were also measured 5 min after inh and iv administration, with concentrations ranging from 2 to 17 and from 14 to 26 ng/mL, respectively. The elimination half-lives were 7 and 11 min after inh and 22 and 24 min after iv administration for THC and CBD, respectively. The mean inh bioavailability (calculated vs. iv) was 55 ± 37 and 59 ± 47% for THC and CBD, respectively. Conjugated 11-carboxy-THC was the main THC metabolite. The nebulized aerosol was generally well tolerated with little or no coughing and only slight psychological adverse effects. These were more distinct after iv administration, especially irritations and hallucinations. Besides moderate tachycardia, the vital functions stayed unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a THC-CBD inh aerosol shows favorable pharmacokinetic properties, which are similar to those of an iv preparation. Adding a local anesthetic is recommended to prevent coughing, which decreases absorption. The negligible psychoactivity may be due to an anti-psychotic effect of CBD, the low THC dosage, and/or the decreased formation of the psychoactive metabolite 11- hydroxy-THC. Therefore, the inhalation via a pMDI is a viable, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to the oral administration.
BACKGROUND: Due to variable absorption and extensive first-pass metabolism, the bioavailability of oral delta-9-tetra-hydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) is low, and, therefore, alternative application forms are necessary. METHODS: In an open-label, 2-period phase-1 study on 11 healthy volunteers, a combination of THC and CBD was compared by pulmonary (inh) and intravenous (iv) application. The liquid aerosol was produced by an in vitro validated pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) device, releasing 41-44% of the cannabinoid dose, enabling a dosage of 81 µg THC and 87 µg CBD per actuation. Three subjects (pilot trial, low-dose session) received 324 and 348 μg THC and CBD, respectively, and 8 subjects (main trial, high-dose session) received 648 and 696 µg THC and CBD, respectively. The addition of the local anesthetic lidocaine to the inh preparation should prevent airways irritation and coughing. The pharmacokinetic evaluation was based on plasma profiles acquired by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Adverse effects were monitored by visual analog scales and measuring vital functions. RESULTS: After low inh doses, THC and CBD were not measurable in plasma longer than 20 and 40 min after administration, respectively. Therefore, only plasma levels resulting after high doses were further evaluated. After inh and iv administration, THC plasma peaks were observed 5 min post-drug, with THC peak concentrations ranging from 3 to 22 and from 13 to 40 ng/mL, respectively. CBD peaks were also measured 5 min after inh and iv administration, with concentrations ranging from 2 to 17 and from 14 to 26 ng/mL, respectively. The elimination half-lives were 7 and 11 min after inh and 22 and 24 min after iv administration for THC and CBD, respectively. The mean inh bioavailability (calculated vs. iv) was 55 ± 37 and 59 ± 47% for THC and CBD, respectively. Conjugated 11-carboxy-THC was the main THC metabolite. The nebulized aerosol was generally well tolerated with little or no coughing and only slight psychological adverse effects. These were more distinct after iv administration, especially irritations and hallucinations. Besides moderate tachycardia, the vital functions stayed unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a THC-CBD inh aerosol shows favorable pharmacokinetic properties, which are similar to those of an iv preparation. Adding a local anesthetic is recommended to prevent coughing, which decreases absorption. The negligible psychoactivity may be due to an anti-psychotic effect of CBD, the low THC dosage, and/or the decreased formation of the psychoactive metabolite 11- hydroxy-THC. Therefore, the inhalation via a pMDI is a viable, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to the oral administration.
Authors: Emma Barkus; Paul D Morrison; D Vuletic; John C Dickson; Peter J Ell; Lyn S Pilowsky; Rudolf Brenneisen; David W Holt; John Powell; Shitij Kapur; Robin M Murray Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Simona Pisanti; Anna Maria Malfitano; Elena Ciaglia; Anna Lamberti; Roberta Ranieri; Gaia Cuomo; Mario Abate; Giorgio Faggiana; Maria Chiara Proto; Donatella Fiore; Chiara Laezza; Maurizio Bifulco Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Amir Englund; Paul D Morrison; Judith Nottage; Dominic Hague; Fergus Kane; Stefania Bonaccorso; James M Stone; Avi Reichenberg; Rudolf Brenneisen; David Holt; Amanda Feilding; Lucy Walker; Robin M Murray; Shitij Kapur Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Paul D Morrison; Judith Nottage; James M Stone; Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Nigel Tunstall; Rudolf Brenneisen; David Holt; Daniel Wilson; Alex Sumich; Philip McGuire; Robin M Murray; Shitij Kapur; Dominic H Ffytche Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Daniel Freeman; Graham Dunn; Robin M Murray; Nicole Evans; Rachel Lister; Angus Antley; Mel Slater; Beata Godlewska; Robert Cornish; Jonathan Williams; Martina Di Simplicio; Artemis Igoumenou; Rudolf Brenneisen; Elizabeth M Tunbridge; Paul J Harrison; Catherine J Harmer; Philip Cowen; Paul D Morrison Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Stefan Lorenzl; Franz Gottwald; Angelika Nistler; Laura Brehm; Renate Grötsch; Georg Haber; Christian Bremm; Christiane Weck; Carina Trummer; Werner Brand Journal: Med Cannabis Cannabinoids Date: 2022-01-18
Authors: Caroline A MacCallum; Lindsay A Lo; Carly A Pistawka; April Christiansen; Michael Boivin; Melissa Snider-Adler Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 5.435