| Literature DB >> 34675703 |
Weilong Xiao1,2, Hui Zhou3, Xinwei Li1, Xue Lin4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Previous studies have investigated the relationship between alexithymia and problematic mobile phone use (PMPU). However, yet gaps in identifying the internal mechanisms of this relationship remain. Hence, based on the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution model, the current research examined the mediating roles of college students' social interaction anxiousness (SIA) and boredom proneness (BPS) in the relationship between alexithymia and PMPU.Entities:
Keywords: alexithymia; boredom proneness; college students; problematic mobile phone use; social interaction anxiousness
Year: 2021 PMID: 34675703 PMCID: PMC8518138 DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S328768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Res Behav Manag ISSN: 1179-1578
Figure 1The multiple mediation model.
Descriptive Statistics and Inter-Correlations Between the Main Variables (N = 1267)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Gender | 0.59 | 0.49 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2. Age | 20.36 | 0.97 | −0.10** | 1 | – | – | – | – |
| 3. TAS | 2.61 | 0.50 | −0.00 | −0.02 | 1 | – | – | – |
| 4. MPAI | 2.78 | 0.72 | 0.05 | −0.06 | 0.40** | 1 | – | – |
| 5. SIA | 3.12 | 0.62 | 0.18** | −0.06* | 0.48** | 0.41** | 1 | – |
| 6. BPS | 3.49 | 0.73 | −0.09** | −0.08** | 0.59** | 0.40** | 0.43** | 1 |
Note: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Abbreviations: M, mean; SD, standard deviation, Gender was dummy coded, which zero stands for male, and one stands for female; TAS, alexithymia; MPAI, mobile phone addiction index, which was used to measure the problematic mobile phone use (PMPU); SIA, social interaction anxiousness; BPS, boredom proneness.
Testing Social Interaction Anxiousness as a Mediator in the Relationship Between Alexithymia and Problematic Mobile Phone Use (N = 1267)
| Criterion | Predictors | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIA | TAS | 0.48 | 0.23 | 375.65*** | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 19.38*** |
| MPAI | TAS | 0.48 | 0.23 | 184.23*** | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.47 | 9.47*** |
| SIA | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 10.13*** |
Notes: ***p < 0.001. Standardized regression coefficients were reported. Bootstrap sample size = 1000.
Abbreviations: TAS, alexithymia; MPAI, mobile phone addiction index, which was used to measure the problematic mobile phone use (PMPU); SIA, social interaction anxiousness; LL, low limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval.
Testing Boredom Proneness as a Mediator in the Relationship Between Alexithymia and Problematic Mobile Phone Use (N = 1267)
| Criterion | Predictors | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPS | TAS | 0.59 | 0.35 | 690.98*** | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.93 | 26.27*** |
| MPAI | TAS | 0.45 | 0.20 | 158.53*** | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.47 | 9.47*** |
| BPS | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.30 | 7.72*** |
Notes: Standardized regression coefficients were reported. Bootstrap sample size = 1000. ***p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: TAS, alexithymia; MPAI, mobile phone addiction index, which was used to measure the problematic mobile phone use (PMPU); BPS, boredom proneness; LL, low limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval.
Testing the Pathways of the Multiple Mediation Model (N=1267)
| Effect | 95% Boot LLCI | 95% Boot ULCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct effects | ||||
| TAS → SIA | 0.60*** | 0.03 | 0.54 | 0.66 |
| TAS → BPS | 0.74*** | 0.04 | 0.67 | 0.81 |
| SIA → BPS | 0.21*** | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.27 |
| TAS → MPAI | 0.25*** | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.34 |
| SIA → MPAI | 0.29*** | 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.36 |
| BPS → MPAI | 0.19*** | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.25 |
| Indirect effects | ||||
| TAS→SIA→MPAI | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| TAS→BPS→MPAI | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.19 |
| TAS→SIA→BPS→MPAI | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
Notes: Standardized regression coefficients were reported. Bootstrap sample size = 1000. ***p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: TAS, alexithymia; MPAI, mobile phone addiction index, which was used to measure the problematic mobile phone use (PMPU); SIA, social interaction anxiousness; BPS, boredom proneness; LL, low limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2The pathway coefficients of multiple mediation model. ***p < 0.001.