Literature DB >> 34675445

Comparison of recharge from drywells and infiltration basins: A modeling study.

Salini Sasidharan1,2, Scott A Bradford2, Jiří Šimůnek1, Stephen R Kraemer3.   

Abstract

Drywells (DWs) and infiltration basins (IBs) are widely used as managed aquifer recharge (MAR) devices to capture stormwater runoff and recharge groundwater. However, no published research has compared the performance of these two engineered systems under shared conditions. Numerical experiments were conducted on an idealized 2D-axisymmetric domain using the HYDRUS (2D/3D) software to systematically study the performance of a circular IB design (diameter and area) and partially penetrating DW (38 m length with water table > 60 m). The effects of subsurface heterogeneity on infiltration, recharge, and storage from the DW and IB under constant head conditions were investigated. The mean cumulative infiltration (μI) and recharge (μR) volumes increased, and the arrival time of recharge decreased with the IB area. Values of μI were higher for a 70 m diameter IB than an DW, whereas the value of μR was higher for a DW after 1-year of a constant head simulation under selected subsurface heterogeneity conditions. A comparison between mean μI, μR, and mean vadose zone storage (μS) values for all DW and IB stochastic simulations (70 for each MAR scenario) under steady-state conditions demonstrated that five DWs can replace a 70 m diameter IB to achieve significantly higher infiltration and recharge over 20 years of operation. Additional numerical experiments were conducted to study the influence of a shallow clay layer by considering an IB, DW, and a DW integrated into an IB. The presence of such a low permeable layer delayed groundwater recharge from an IB. In contrast, a DW can penetrate tight clay layers and release water below them and facilitate rapid infiltration and recharge. The potential benefits of a DW compared to an IB include a smaller footprint, the potential for pre-treatments to remove contaminants, less evaporation, less mobilization of in-situ contaminants, and potentially lower maintenance costs. Besides, this study demonstrates that combining both IB and DW helps to get the best out of both MAR techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drywell; HYDRUS (2D/3D); Infiltration; Infiltration Basin; Managed aquifer recharge (MAR); Recharge

Year:  2021        PMID: 34675445      PMCID: PMC8525426          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)        ISSN: 0022-1694            Impact factor:   5.722


  8 in total

1.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth.

Authors:  C J Vörösmarty; P Green; J Salisbury; R B Lammers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Implementation of a monitoring system to measure impact of stormwater runoff infiltration.

Authors:  S Barraud; J Gibert; T Winiarski; J L Bertrand Krajewski
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.915

3.  Managed aquifer recharge: rediscovering nature as a leading edge technology.

Authors:  P Dillon; S Toze; D Page; J Vanderzalm; E Bekele; J Sidhu; S Rinck-Pfeiffer
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.915

4.  When can inverted water tables occur beneath streams?

Authors:  Yueqing Xie; Peter G Cook; Philip Brunner; Dylan J Irvine; Craig T Simmons
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Drywell infiltration and hydraulic properties in heterogeneous soil profiles.

Authors:  Salini Sasidharan; Scott A Bradford; Jiří Šimůnek; Stephen R Kraemer
Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.722

6.  Groundwater Recharge from Drywells Under Constant Head Conditions.

Authors:  Salini Sasidharan; Scott A Bradford; Jiří Šimůnek; Stephen R Kraemer
Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.722

7.  Evaluating drywells for stormwater management and enhanced aquifer recharge.

Authors:  Salini Sasidharan; Scott A Bradford; Jiří Šimůnek; Bill De Jong; Stephen R Kraemer
Journal:  Adv Water Resour       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.510

8.  Spatial distribution of pollution in an urban stormwater infiltration basin.

Authors:  Magali Dechesne; Sylvie Barraud; Jean-Pascal Bardin
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.188

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.