Literature DB >> 34675342

Short-term and long-term mate preference in men and women in an Iranian population.

Fatemeh Sadat Mirfazeli1, Meng-Chuan Lai2,3,4,5,6, Amirhossein Memari7, Armin Rajab8, Milad Shafizadeh9, Sahar Zarei10, Seyed Vahid Shariat1,11, Maryam Haghighi Fashi12,13, Ebrahim Barzegary14, Abdol-Hossein Vahabie15,16,17.   

Abstract

Mate preference in short-term relationships and long-term ones may depend on many physical, psychological, and socio-cultural factors. In this study, 178 students (81 females) in sports and 153 engineering students (64 females) answered the systemizing quotient (SQ) and empathizing quotient (EQ) questionnaires and had their digit ratio measured. They rated their preferred mate on 12 black-line drawing body figures varying in body mass index (BMI) and waist to hip ratio (WHR) for short-term and long-term relationships. Men relative to women preferred lower WHR and BMI for mate selection for both short-term and long-term relationships. BMI and WHR preference in men is independent of each other, but has a negative correlation in women. For men, digit ratio was inversely associated with BMI (p = 0.039, B = - 0.154) preference in a short-term relationship, and EQ was inversely associated with WHR preference in a long-term relationship (p = 0.045, B = - 0.164). Furthermore, men and women in sports, compared to engineering students, preferred higher (p = 0.009, B = 0.201) and lower BMI (p = 0.034, B = - 0.182) for short-term relationships, respectively. Women were more consistent in their preferences for short-term and long-term relationships relative to men. Both biological factors and social/experiential factors contribute to mate preferences in men while in women, mostly social/experiential factors contribute to them.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34675342      PMCID: PMC8531382          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99653-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  42 in total

1.  The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences.

Authors:  Simon Baron-Cohen; Jennifer Richler; Dheraj Bisarya; Nhishanth Gurunathan; Sally Wheelwright
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Female mate value at a glance: relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness.

Authors:  Devendra Singh
Journal:  Neuro Endocrinol Lett       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 0.765

3.  Body fat distribution in the Finnish population: environmental determinants and predictive power for cardiovascular risk factor levels.

Authors:  B Marti; J Tuomilehto; V Salomaa; L Kartovaara; H J Korhonen; P Pietinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness.

Authors:  M J Tovée; S Reinhardt; J L Emery; P L Cornelissen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Evidence for assortative mating on digit ratio (2D:4D), a biomarker for prenatal androgen exposure.

Authors:  Martin Voracek; Stefan G Dressler; John T Manning
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2006-10-20

6.  The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen.

Authors:  J T Manning; D Scutt; J Wilson; D I Lewis-Jones
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences.

Authors:  Simon Baron-Cohen; Sally Wheelwright
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2004-04

8.  Influence of Low-Level Prenatal Exposure to PCDD/Fs and PCBs on Empathizing, Systemizing and Autistic Traits: Results from the Duisburg Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nikola Nowack; Jürgen Wittsiepe; Monika Kasper-Sonnenberg; Michael Wilhelm; Axel Schölmerich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Farsi Versions of Empathy and Systemizing Quotient: Short Forms.

Authors:  Masih Shafiei; Meng Chuan Lai; Amir Hossein Memari; Fatemeh Sadat Mirfazeli; Sahar Zarei; Pouria Moshayedi; Ramin Kordi
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10

10.  Fetal testosterone and empathy.

Authors:  Rebecca Knickmeyer; Simon Baron-Cohen; Peter Raggatt; Kevin Taylor; Gerald Hackett
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 3.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.