Literature DB >> 34674857

Impaired memory B-cell response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in patients with common variable immunodeficiency.

Ane Fernandez Salinas1, Eva Piano Mortari2, Sara Terreri2, Cinzia Milito3, Salvatore Zaffina4, Carlo Federico Perno5, Franco Locatelli6, Isabella Quinti3, Rita Carsetti7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34674857      PMCID: PMC8523297          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: The recent article by Hagin et al reports that most patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) generate humoral and cellular immune responses to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Neutralizing anti–receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies, RBD-specific B cells of the IgG+ and IgA+ isotype, and T cells producing IL-2 and IFN-γ were detected in most vaccinated patients. Hagin et al conclude that patients with IEI should be vaccinated because most of them are able to generate protective responses. Although we completely agree on the necessity of vaccinating patients with IEI, it is also indispensable to correctly evaluate the establishment and duration of protective immunity in this group of patients. We conducted a similar study in a cohort of 33 patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). We evaluated the level of SARS-CoV-2–specific serum antibodies and frequency of memory B cells (MBCs) following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Only 33% of our patients with CVID showed an antibody response, compared with 85.7% of the patients (12 of 14) reported by Hagin et al (see Fig 2, A in Hagin et al). Hagin et al also measured RBD-specific MBCs, which play a fundamental role in long-term protection when serum antibody levels decline. In Fig E2 of Hagin et al (available in the Online Repository at www.jacionline.org), the gating strategy to identify RBD-specific IgG+ and IgA+ B cells and the percentage thereof are shown. Hagin et al conclude that RBD-binding B cells are detected in healthy vaccinated donors and patients with CVID. We have different results showing that healthy vaccinated donors generate RBD-specific MBCs after 2 vaccine doses, whereas patients with CVID are unable to do so (Fig 1 ).
Fig 1

Detection of RBD-binding MBCs in healthy vaccinated donors (HVs) (left plots) and patients with CVID (right plots). MBCs, contained in the CD19 gate, were identified as CD24+CD27+. MBCs binding RBDs were detected by RBD-biotin labeled with streptavidin–fluorescein isothiocyanate. The numbers shown correspond to the RBD+ events divided by the total number of acquired live cells. HVs 1, 2, and 3 have the requisites to reach the limit of quantification (LOQ), and the percentages can be considered reliable. HV 4 is just under the limit of LOQ, but the number of events is sufficient for the limit of detection. None of the samples from patients with CVID had sufficient RBD+ events to reach either the limit of detection or the LOQ. Thus, frequencies are not reported.

Detection of RBD-binding MBCs in healthy vaccinated donors (HVs) (left plots) and patients with CVID (right plots). MBCs, contained in the CD19 gate, were identified as CD24+CD27+. MBCs binding RBDs were detected by RBD-biotin labeled with streptavidin–fluorescein isothiocyanate. The numbers shown correspond to the RBD+ events divided by the total number of acquired live cells. HVs 1, 2, and 3 have the requisites to reach the limit of quantification (LOQ), and the percentages can be considered reliable. HV 4 is just under the limit of LOQ, but the number of events is sufficient for the limit of detection. None of the samples from patients with CVID had sufficient RBD+ events to reach either the limit of detection or the LOQ. Thus, frequencies are not reported. Our different results might be explained by the difficulty of correctly quantifying cells present at low frequency in the sample analyzed. Flow cytometry can effectively and accurately manage extremely rare event analyses down to 10-5. In cases of rare event analysis, the nonspecific cell events can often outnumber the relevant cell frequency, making the count totally unreliable. Introduction of the concepts of limit of detection and limit of quantification in rare event analysis has been a remarkable advancement to ensure robust and reliable measurements of rare events. Only when the limit of quantification is achieved can the frequency be considered reliable. The numbers of relevant events (RBD-specific B cells in this case) should be a defined percentage of the total acquired events. RBD+ cells are a fraction of the MBCs generated by vaccination. B cells acquire increased specificity and affinity thanks to the mechanisms of somatic mutation and selection in the germinal centers. These mechanisms are severely impaired in patients with CVID. Beyond the technicalities, an inaccurate evaluation of the number of specific MBCs may lead to the conclusion that patients are protected and will be able to react to a SARS-CoV-2 encounter thanks to their MBCs. In contrast, when serum titers decline, patients with CVID will be unable to produce new specific antibodies because they lack the right MBCs. Administration of mAbs may prevent severe disease and emergence of new viral variants in these cases.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Immunizing the imperfect immune system: Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with inborn errors of immunity.

Authors:  Jessica R Durkee-Shock; Michael D Keller
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.248

2.  Mortality in Severe Antibody Deficiencies Patients during the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Vaccination and Monoclonal Antibodies Efficacy.

Authors:  Cinzia Milito; Francesco Cinetto; Andrea Palladino; Giulia Garzi; Alessandra Punziano; Gianluca Lagnese; Riccardo Scarpa; Marcello Rattazzi; Anna Maria Pesce; Federica Pulvirenti; Giulia Di Napoli; Giuseppe Spadaro; Rita Carsetti; Isabella Quinti
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Persistent B cell memory after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is functional during breakthrough infections.

Authors:  Sara Terreri; Eva Piano Mortari; Maria Rosaria Vinci; Cristina Russo; Claudia Alteri; Christian Albano; Francesca Colavita; Giulia Gramigna; Chiara Agrati; Giulia Linardos; Luana Coltella; Luna Colagrossi; Gloria Deriu; Marta Ciofi Degli Atti; Caterina Rizzo; Marco Scarsella; Rita Brugaletta; Vincenzo Camisa; Annapaola Santoro; Giuseppe Roscilli; Emiliano Pavoni; Alessia Muzi; Nicola Magnavita; Rossana Scutari; Alberto Villani; Massimiliano Raponi; Franco Locatelli; Carlo Federico Perno; Salvatore Zaffina; Rita Carsetti
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 21.023

4.  Case Report: Precision COVID-19 Immunization Strategy to Overcome Individual Fragility: A Case of Generalized Lipodystrophy Type 4.

Authors:  Salvatore Zaffina; Eva Piano Mortari; Reparata Rosa Di Prinzio; Marco Cappa; Antonio Novelli; Emanuele Agolini; Massimiliano Raponi; Bruno Dallapiccola; Franco Locatelli; Carlo Federico Perno; Rita Carsetti
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 8.786

5.  Specific Antibody and the T-Cell Response Elicited by BNT162b2 Boosting After Two ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Vera Goda; Gergely Kriván; Andrea Kulcsár; Márton Gönczi; Szabolcs Tasnády; Zsolt Matula; Ginette Nagy; Gabriella Bekő; Máté Horváth; Ferenc Uher; Zoltán Szekanecz; István Vályi-Nagy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 8.786

6.  Real-life data on monoclonal antibodies and antiviral drugs in Italian inborn errors of immunity patients during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Giulia Garzi; Francesco Cinetto; Davide Firinu; Giulia Di Napoli; Gianluca Lagnese; Alessandra Punziano; Patrick Bez; Bianca Laura Cinicola; Giulia Costanzo; Riccardo Scarpa; Federica Pulvirenti; Marcello Rattazzi; Giuseppe Spadaro; Isabella Quinti; Cinzia Milito
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 7.  SARS-CoV-2 pre-exposure prophylaxis: A potential COVID-19 preventive strategy for high-risk populations, including healthcare workers, immunodeficient individuals, and poor vaccine responders.

Authors:  Jing Ouyang; Silvere D Zaongo; Vijay Harypursat; Xiaofang Li; Jean-Pierre Routy; Yaokai Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-08

8.  Safety and immunogenicity of 3 doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in children and adults with inborn errors of immunity.

Authors:  Daniel Leung; Xiaofeng Mu; Jaime S Rosa Duque; Samuel M S Cheng; Manni Wang; Wenyue Zhang; Yanmei Zhang; Issan Y S Tam; Toby S S Lee; Jennifer H Y Lam; Sau Man Chan; Cheuk Hei Cheang; Yuet Chung; Howard H W Wong; Amos M T Lee; Wing Yan Li; Sara Chaothai; Leo C H Tsang; Gilbert T Chua; Kai-Ning Cheong; Elaine Y L Au; Janette S Y Kwok; Koon Wing Chan; Patrick C Y Chong; Pamela P W Lee; Marco H K Ho; Tsz Leung Lee; Wenwei Tu; Malik Peiris; Yu Lung Lau
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 9.  COVID-19 and Inborn Errors of Immunity.

Authors:  Ottavia M Delmonte; Riccardo Castagnoli; Luigi D Notarangelo
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-08-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.