| Literature DB >> 34672919 |
Claire Belkhou1,2, Raul Tito Tadeo1,2, Rodrigo Bacigalupe1,2, Mireia Valles-Colomer3, Samuel Chaffron4, Marie Joossens5, Alexandra Obregon6, Luis Marín Reyes7, Omar Trujillo8, Geert R B Huys1,2, Jeroen Raes1,2.
Abstract
A Gram-stain-negative, obligatory anaerobic spirochaete (RCC2812T) was isolated from a faecal sample obtained from an individual residing in a remote Amazonian community in Peru. The bacterium showed highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to the pig intestinal spirochete Treponema succinifaciens (89.48 %). Average nucleotide identity values between strain RCC2812T and all available Treponema genomes from validated type strains were all <73 %, thus clearly lower than the species delineation threshold. The DNA G+C content of RCC2812T was 41.24 mol%. Phenotypic characterization using the API-ZYM and API 20A systems confirmed the divergent position of this bacterium within the genus Treponema. Strain RCC2812T could be differentiated from the phylogenetically most closely related T. succinifaciens by the presence of alkaline phosphatase and α -glucosidase activities. Unlike T. succinifaciens, strain RCC2812T grew equally well with or without serum. Strain RCC2812T is the first commensal Treponema isolated from the human faecal microbiota of remote populations, and based on the collected data represents a novel Treponema species for which the name Treponema peruense sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is RCC2812T (=LMG 31794T=CIP 111910T).Entities:
Keywords: Treponema; faeces; gut; human; microbiome; spirochaete
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34672919 PMCID: PMC8604162 DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ISSN: 1466-5026 Impact factor: 2.747
Fig. 1.Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA genes from all species of the genus presently recognized along with isolate RCC2812T. This phylogenetic tree was generated with FastTree using the maximum-likelihood method, based on the generalized time-reversible model (there were a total of 1242 nucleotide positions in the final dataset). Bootstrap values (only those >70 % are shown) based on 1000 replicates are shown at the branch nodes for the maximum-likelihood method. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Bar: 0,04 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Fig. 2.(a) Genome representation of strain RCC2812T mapping from the outside to the inside of the circle: all predicted genes, cog, kegg, go, non-coding RNA, G+C content and G+C skew, (b) gene predictions with COG and (c) KEGG.
Fig. 3.(a and b): Conventional scanning electron microscopy images of RCC2812T (a, in spiral shape, b, in cystic form). (c): Transmission electron microscopy images of RCC2812T with negative staining (arrow showing one of the two periplasmic fibrils originating subterminally from the end of the protoplasmic cylinder). (d) Conventional transmission electron microscopy image of a thin side section of a RCC2812T cell (arrow showing again two periplasmic fibrils in bundle surrounded by the outer sheath).
Comparison of enzyme activity profiles of oral and gastrointestinal type strains from human, porcine and bovine hosts using the API ZYM system
Enzymes tested: 1, alkaline phosphatase; 2, C4 esterase; 3, C8 esterase lipase; 4, C14 lipase; 5, leucine arylamidase; 6, valine arylamidase; 7, cystine arylamidase; 8, trypsin; 9, chymotrypsin; 10, acid phosphatase; 11, naphtholphohydrolase; 12, α-galactosidase; 13, β-galactosidase; 14, β-glucuronidase; 15, α-glucosidase; 16, β-glucosidase; 17, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase; 18, α-mannosidase; 19, α-fucosidase. +, Positive; −, negative.
|
Species/subspecies |
Strain |
Presence of enzyme activity | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 | ||
|
|
RCC2812T |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
DSM 2489T |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
−/+ |
|
|
DSM 103679T |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
DSM 103462T |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 700770T |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC BAA-909T |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC BAA-908T |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
DSM 18691T |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 700293T |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
DSM 12168T |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 33768T |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 35536T |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 35534T |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 35535T |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 51939T |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
|
ATCC 700288T |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
|
ATCC 35405T |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 700334T |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
ATCC 700332T |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
API ZYM data previously reported by *Evans et al. [18]; †Wyss et al. [28]; ‡Nordhoff et al. [29]; §Evans et al. [30]; ||Schrank et al. [31]; ¶Wyss et al. [32]; #Wyss et al. [33]; **Wyss et al. [34]; ††Wyss et al. [35].