Literature DB >> 34672889

Development of a concise injury severity prediction model for pediatric patients involved in a motor vehicle collision.

Thomas R Hartka1, Timothy McMurry2, Ashley Weaver3, Federico E Vaca4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transporting severely injured pediatric patients to a trauma center has been shown to decrease mortality. A decision support tool to assist emergency medical services (EMS) providers with trauma triage would be both as parsimonious as possible and highly accurate. The objective of this study was to determine the minimum set of predictors required to accurately predict severe injury in pediatric patients.
METHODS: Crash data and patient injuries were obtained from the NASS and CISS databases. A baseline multivariable logistic model was developed to predict severe injury in pediatric patients using the following predictors: age, sex, seat row, restraint use, ejection, entrapment, posted speed limit, any airbag deployment, principal direction of force (PDOF), change in velocity (delta-V), single vs. multiple collisions, and non-rollover vs. rollover. The outcomes of interest were injury severity score (ISS) ≥16 and the Target Injury List (TIL). Accuracy was measured by the cross-validation mean of the receiver operator curve (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). We used Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) based on all subsets regression to determine the importance of each variable separately for each outcome. The AUC of the highest performing model for each number of variables was compared to the baseline model to assess for a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). A reduced variable set model was derived using this information.
RESULTS: The baseline models performed well (ISS ≥ 16: AUC 0.91 [95% CI: 0.86-0.95], TIL: AUC 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86-0.94]). Using BMA, the rank of the importance of the predictors was identical for both ISS ≥ 16 and TIL. There was no statistically significant decrease in accuracy until the models were reduced to fewer than five and six variables for predicting ISS ≥ 16 and TIL, respectively. A reduced variable set model developed using the top five variables (delta-V, entrapment, ejection, restraint use, and near-side collision) to predict ISS ≥ 16 had an AUC 0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.96]. Among the models that did not include delta-V, the highest AUC was 0.82 [95% CI: 0.77-0.87].
CONCLUSIONS: A succinct logistic regression model can accurately predict severely injured pediatric patients, which could be used for prehospital trauma triage. However, there remains a critical need to obtain delta-V in real-time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CISS; MVC; NASS; Pediatrics; injury prediction; prehospital

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34672889      PMCID: PMC8792360          DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1975275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev        ISSN: 1538-9588            Impact factor:   2.183


  33 in total

1.  Validation of the urgency algorithm for near-side crashes.

Authors:  J Augenstein; E Perdeck; J Stratton; K Digges; J Steps; G Bahouth
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2002

2.  Comparison of Bayesian model averaging and stepwise methods for model selection in logistic regression.

Authors:  Duolao Wang; Wenyang Zhang; Ameet Bakhai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The Major Causes of Death in Children and Adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  Rebecca M Cunningham; Maureen A Walton; Patrick M Carter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A pedestrian serious injury risk prediction method based on posted speed limit.

Authors:  Tetsuya Nishimoto; Kazuhiro Kubota; Giulio Ponte
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2019-05-22

5.  Emerging technology for vehicular safety and emergency response to roadway crashes.

Authors:  H R Champion; B Cushing
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Prospective Validation of the National Field Triage Guidelines for Identifying Seriously Injured Persons.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Rongwei Fu; Dana Zive; Tom Rea; Susan Malveau; Mohamud Daya; Jonathan Jui; Denise E Griffiths; Lynn Wittwer; Ritu Sahni; K Dean Gubler; Jonathan Chin; Pat Klotz; Stephanie Somerville; Tina Beeler; T J Bishop; Tara N Garland; Eileen Bulger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  BAYESIAN MODEL SEARCH AND MULTILEVEL INFERENCE FOR SNP ASSOCIATION STUDIES.

Authors:  Melanie A Wilson; Edwin S Iversen; Merlise A Clyde; Scott C Schmidler; Joellen M Schildkraut
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Model selection in medical research: a simulation study comparing Bayesian model averaging and stepwise regression.

Authors:  Anna Genell; Szilard Nemes; Gunnar Steineck; Paul W Dickman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models.

Authors:  Olga V Demler; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Selecting and using the most appropriate car safety seats for growing children: guidelines for counseling parents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.