Literature DB >> 34672828

Relationship Between Pitch Volume and Subjective Report of Injury in High School Female Fast-Pitch Softball Pitchers.

Brittany Gooch1, Bradley S Lambert2, Haley Goble2, Patrick C McCulloch2, Corbin Hedt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between pitch volume and injury is well-represented within baseball literature. However, the impact of softball pitch volume on injury epidemiology is limited. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to determine if increased pitch volumes in high school-aged softball pitchers are related to increased rates of subjectively reported pain/injury. We hypothesized that pitchers with increased volumes would have higher pain/injury rates. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.
METHODS: A total of 28 female softball pitchers (aged 14-18 years) completed an online survey of questions pertaining to pitching history, pitch volume, and subjective report of pain or injury in the back, shoulder, and elbow. An independent-samples t test was used to (1) compare pitch volumes in those who reported pain in individual body regions (shoulder, elbow, back) compared with those who did not; (2) compare pitch volumes in those who reported pain in 0 or 1 of the regions of interest compared with 2 or 3 regions; and (3) compare the reported percentage of the past year that players reported playing through pain in players who averaged >85 compared with <85 pitches per game. Chi-square analysis was used to compare those who pitched either >85 or <85 pitches per game with regard to frequency of shoulder pain, elbow pain, back pain, seeking of medical attention, and actual injury diagnosis. Type I error was set at α = 0.05.
RESULTS: Weekly and yearly pitch counts were higher in those reporting pain or injury (YES) than those who did not (NO) in the shoulder (pitches per week: NO = 219 ± 35; YES = 429 ± 101; P = 0.027) (pitches per year: NO = 8876 ± 946; YES = 19,195 ± 4944; P = 0.022) and back (pitches per week: NO = 188 ± 16; YES = 426 ± 90; P = 0.014) (pitches per year: NO = 8334 ± 793; YES = 18,252 ± 4340; P = 0.027). Similar results were observed for those with pain or injury reported in 2 or 3 regions compared with 0 or 1 regions (pitches per week: NO = 220 ± 38; YES = 414 ± 95; P = 0.039) (pitches per year: NO = 8765 ± 1010; YES = 18,661 ± 4623; P = 0.028). Those reporting shoulder pain or injury also reported higher pitch counts per game (NO = 71.4 ± 5.2; YES = 83 ± 4; P = 0.049), and those reporting back pain also reported playing more games per week (NO = 2.7 ± 0.2; YES = 5.2 ± 1.1; P = 0.034). Those with pitch counts of >85/game were more than twice as likely to see a physician regarding pain/injury (P = 0.027) and reported playing through pain a higher percentage of the year (>85, 49.3% ± 10%; <85, 25.2% ± 6%; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: High pitching volumes commonly prevalent in high school-aged softball pitchers may be associated with increased pain/injury and appear related to cumulative volume. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides recommendations for cumulative pitch volume guidelines in softball pitchers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  back; elbow; overuse; pitching; shoulder; softball

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34672828      PMCID: PMC9460084          DOI: 10.1177/19417381211051381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Health        ISSN: 1941-0921            Impact factor:   4.355


  22 in total

1.  Throwing patterns used by collegiate baseball players in actual games.

Authors:  David D Barrett; Allen W Burton
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Kinematics and kinetics of elite windmill softball pitching.

Authors:  Sherry L Werner; Deryk G Jones; John A Guido; Michael E Brunet
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Injuries to pitchers in women's collegiate fast-pitch softball.

Authors:  A R Loosli; R K Requa; J G Garrick; E Hanley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Biomechanics of windmill softball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms at the shoulder and elbow.

Authors:  S W Barrentine; G S Fleisig; J A Whiteside; R F Escamilla; J R Andrews
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Injuries and medical issues in softball.

Authors:  Susannah M Briskin
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 6.  When Is It Too Early for Single Sport Specialization?

Authors:  Brian T Feeley; Julie Agel; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Pitch Counts in Youth Baseball and Softball: A Historical Review.

Authors:  Brian T Feeley; Jessica Schisel; Julie Agel
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Passive ranges of motion of the hips and their relationship with pitching biomechanics and ball velocity in professional baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Andrew J Robb; Glenn Fleisig; Kevin Wilk; Leonard Macrina; Becky Bolt; Jason Pajaczkowski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Shoulder range of motion, pitch count, and injuries among interscholastic female softball pitchers: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Ellen Shanley; Lori A Michener; Todd S Ellenbecker; Mitchell J Rauh
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-10

10.  Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Glenn S Fleisig; James R Andrews; E David Osinski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.