| Literature DB >> 34671676 |
Soudabeh Sabetian1, Bahia Namavar Jahromi1,2, Sina Vakili1, Sedighe Forouhari1, Shohreh Alipour3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Male infertility is a main clinical problem that affects about 7% of all men worldwide. Many patients with male infertility are caused by a reduced antioxidant capacity of semen. Several antioxidant supplements, especially vitamin E, are proposed to help male infertility treatment. This project was goaled to study the effects of oral synthetic vitamin E (400 IU/day) for eight weeks on betterment of semen parameters and pregnancy rate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34671676 PMCID: PMC8523239 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5588275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1CONSORT flowchart of study participants.
Demographic data.
| Cases with primary infertility | 104 |
| Cases with secondary infertility | 20 |
| Male age (mean ± SD) | 36.11 ± 6.88 |
| Female partner age (mean ± SD) | 31.50 ± 5.64 |
Age and baseline semen parameters of vitamin E and placebo groups.
| Variables | Placebo treatment | Vitamin E treatment |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient age (years) | 35.76 ± 7.24 | 36.72 ± 6.61 | 0.60 |
| Female partner age (years) | 31.28 ± 6.00 | 31.71 ± 5.27 | 0.67 |
| Sperm volume (ml) | 3.45 ± 1.59 | 3.11 ± 1.61 | 0.25 |
| Sperm concentration (×106/ml) | 9.91 ± 10.92 | 12.16 ± 16.21 | 0.38 |
| Sperm motility (% WHO grade | 32.27 ± 13.93 | 31.08 ± 13.27 | 0.63 |
| Sperm morphology (% normal) | 2.37 ± 1.57 | 2.22 ± 1.66 | 0.36 |
Results are represented as mean ± SD.
Semen parameters in placebo and vitamin E group before and after trial (paired T-test).
| Groups | Mean ± SD | Paired differences | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 95% confidence interval of the difference |
| |||
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Vitamin E | |||||
| Volume 1 (ml) | 3.11 ± 1.61 | −.011 ± 1.82 | -0.47 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| Volume 2 (ml) | 3.12 ± 1.37 | ||||
| Count 1 (×106/ml) | 12.16 ± 16.21 | 2.10 ± 8.93 | -0.14 | 4.35 | 0.06 |
| Count 2 | 10.05 ± 13.34 | ||||
| Motility 1 (% WHO grade | 31.08 ± 13.27 | −0.71 ± 15.75 | -4.68 | 3.25 | 0.72 |
| Motility 2 (% WHO grade | 31.80 ± 14.29 | ||||
| Morphology 1 (% normal) | 2.22 ± 1.66 | 0.36 ± 1.65 | -0.05 | 0.78 | 0.08 |
| Morphology2 (% normal) | 1.85 ± 1.35 | ||||
| Placebo group | |||||
| Volume 1) ml) | 3.34 ± 1.59 | 0.19 ± 1.71 | -0.24 | 0.64 | 0.37 |
| Volume 2) ml) | 3.25 ± 1.41 | ||||
| Count 1 (×106/ml) | 9.91 ± 10.92 | 0.01 ± 6.50 | -1.65 | 1.67 | 0.98 |
| Count 2 (×106/ml) | 9.90 ± 14.79 | ||||
| Motility 1 (% WHO grade | 32.27 ± 13.93 | 0.42 ± 13.09 | -2.92 | 3.77 | 0.80 |
| Motility 2 (% WHO grade | 31.85 ± 12.86 | ||||
| Morphology 1 (% normal) | 2.37 ± 1.57 | 0.40 ± 1.64 | -0.01 | 0.83 | 0.05 |
| Morphology 2 (% normal) | 1.97 ± 1.33 | ||||
1: before treatment and 2: after treatment.
IVF results of the placebo and vitamin E groups after treatment period.
| IVF results | Placebo ( | Vitamin E ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancellation of cycles | 6 (9.8%) | 10 (16.4%) | 0.41 |
| No embryo developed | 8 (13.1%) | 5 (8.2%) | 0.55 |
| Negative clinical-chemical pregnancy | 35 (57.4%) | 38 (62.3%) | 0.70 |
| Positive chemical pregnancy | 12 (19.7%) | 10 (16.4%) | 0.80 |
| Abortion before 14 weeks | 2 (3.3%) | 4 (6.6%) | 0.66 |
| Abortion after 14 weeks | 1 (1.6%) | 0 | 0.99 |
| Live birth | 9 (14.8%) | 6 (9.8%) | 0.56 |