| Literature DB >> 34671562 |
Guangliang Jiang1, Hui Wang2,3,4, Da Huang1, Yishuo Wu2,3, Weihong Ding2,3, Qidong Zhou2,3, Qiang Ding2,3, Ning Zhang1, Rong Na1, Ke Xu2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CX3CL1 is a chemokine that may play important roles in cancer immune regulation. Its mechanism in bladder cancer (BCa) is poorly understood. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the association between CX3CL1 and BCa and the related biological mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: CX3CL1; ERK; MAPK; bladder cancer; survival analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34671562 PMCID: PMC8521074 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.752860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Clinical characteristics of entire cohort and subgroups by CX3CL1 expression.
| Characteristics, n (%) | Entire Cohort ( | CX3CL1 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative ( | Positive ( | |||
| Age | ||||
| ≤65 years | 129 (46.6) | 11 (8.5) | 118 (91.5) | <0.0001 |
| >65 years | 148 (53.4) | 39 (26.4) | 109 (73.6) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 234 (84.5) | 45 (19.2) | 189 (80.8) | 0.233 |
| Female | 43 (15.5) | 5 (11.6) | 38 (88.4) | |
| BMI | ||||
| <24 | 158 (57.0) | 27 (17.1) | 131 (82.9) | 0.631 |
| ≥24 | 119 (43.0) | 23 (19.3) | 96 (80.7) | |
| Smoking | ||||
| No | 194 (70.0) | 32 (16.5) | 162 (83.5) | 0.262 |
| Yes | 83 (30.0) | 18 (21.7) | 65 (78.3) | |
| Tumor size | ||||
| <3cm | 123 (44.4) | 27 (22.0) | 96 (78.0) | 0.131 |
| ≥3cm | 154 (55.6) | 23 (14.9) | 131 (85.1) | |
| No. of tumor sites | ||||
| Single | 125 (45.1) | 21 (16.8) | 104 (83.2) | 0.624 |
| Multiple | 152 (54.9) | 29 (19.1) | 123 (80.9) | |
| Tumor stage | ||||
| Ta-T1 | 188 (67.9) | 25 (13.3) | 163 (86.7) | 0.003 |
| T2-T4 | 89 (32.1) | 25 (28.1) | 64 (71.9) | |
| Tumor grade | ||||
| Low | 147 (53.1) | 20 (13.6) | 127 (86.4) | 0.041 |
| High | 130 (46.9) | 30 (23.1) | 100 (76.9) | |
| Ki67 expression | ||||
| <30% | 171 (61.7) | 34 (19.9) | 137 (80.1) | 0.314 |
| ≥30% | 106 (38.3) | 16 (15.1) | 90 (84.9) | |
| Carcinoma | ||||
| No | 253 (91.3) | 47 (18.6) | 206 (81.4) | 0.459 |
| Yes | 24 (8.7) | 3 (12.5) | 21 (87.5) | |
| Recurrence | ||||
| No | 192 (69.3) | 40 (20.8) | 152 (79.2) | 0.07 |
| Yes | 85 (30.7) | 10 (11.8) | 75 (88.2) | |
| Metastasis | ||||
| No | 236 (85.2) | 45 (19.1) | 191 (80.9) | 0.291 |
| Yes | 41 (14.8) | 5 (12.2) | 36 (87.8) | |
| Death | ||||
| No | 226 (81.6) | 46 (20.4) | 180 (79.6) | 0.036 |
| Yes | 51 (18.4) | 4 (7.8) | 47 (92.2) | |
BMI, body mass index.
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses on tumor recurrence.
| Predictors | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| AOR (95% CI) |
| ||
| Age | ≤65 years | 1.00 (Ref.) | / | / | |
| >65 years | 1.11 (0.67-1.86) | 0.679 | / | / | |
| Gender | Male | 1.00 (Ref.) | / | / | |
| Female | 1.35 (0.64-2.82) | 0.431 | / | / | |
| BMI | <24 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| ≥24 | 0.93 (0.86-1.00) | 0.046 | 0.95 (0.88-1.03) | 0.229 | |
| Smoking | No | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| Yes | 1.80 (1.05-3.10) | 0.033 | 1.98 (1.09-3.60) | 0.025 | |
| Tumor size | <3cm | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| ≥3cm | 1.21 (1.03-1.42) | 0.017 | 1.42 (1.05-1.91) | 0.036 | |
| No. of tumor sites | Single | 1.00 (Ref.) | / | / | |
| Multiple | 1.45 (0.86-2.44) | 0.162 | / | / | |
| Tumor stage | Ta-T1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| T2-T4 | 2.41 (1.41-4.11) | 0.001 | 1.83 (1.45-3.34) | 0.027 | |
| Tumor grade | Low | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| High | 2.30 (1.37-3.88) | 0.002 | 1.82 (0.81-4.13) | 0.011 | |
| Ki67 expression | <30% | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| ≥30% | 1.02 (1.01-1.04) | <0.001 | 1.02 (1.01-1.05) | 0.002 | |
| Carcinoma | No | 1.00 (Ref.) | / | / | |
| Yes | 0.92 (0.37-2.32) | 0.866 | / | / | |
| CX3CL1 | Negative | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| Positive | 2.44 (1.24-2.83) | 0.001 | 2.37 (1.18-2.75) | 0.006 | |
OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; Ref, reference; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 1Survival curves. (A) Cumulative tumor recurrence rate: the blue line represents the cumulative recurrence rate of 277 patients with bladder cancer with positive CX3CL1 expression; the red line represents the CX3CL1 expression-negative group. (B) Cancer-specific survival: the blue line represents the cancer-specific survival of the bladder cancer CX3CL1-positive group; the red line represents the CX3CL1 expression-negative group. (C) Overall mortality in the TCGA database: the blue line represents the overall mortality associated with 406 bladder cancer samples obtained from the TCGA database with positive CX3CL1 expression; the red line represents the CX3CL1 expression-negative group. HR, hazard ratio; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.
Univariable and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for cancer-specific mortality in Cox proportional hazards models.
| Predictors | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| AHR (95% CI) |
| ||
| Age | ≤65 years | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| >65 years | 2.99 (1.59-5.62) | 0.001 | 2.22 (1.08-4.57) | 0.031 | |
| Gender | Male | 1.00 (Ref.) | / | / | |
| Female | 1.25 (0.55-2.86) | 0.597 | / | / | |
| BMI | <24 | 1.00 (Ref.) | / | / | |
| ≥24 | 0.95 (0.87-1.03) | 0.223 | / | / | |
| Smoking | No | 1.00 (Ref.) | / | / | |
| Yes | 0.65 (0.34-1.27) | 0.207 | / | / | |
| Tumor size | <3cm | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| ≥3cm | 2.19 (1.19-4.04) | 0.012 | 2.26 (0.94-5.39) | 0.067 | |
| No. of tumor sites | Single | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| Multiple | 1.88 (1.03-3.41) | 0.040 | 1.67 (1.29-3.51) | 0.131 | |
| Tumor stage | Ta-T1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| T2-T4 | 2.68 (1.49-4.82) | 0.001 | 1.77 (1.30-3.96) | 0.178 | |
| Tumor grade | Low | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| High | 3.42 (1.85-6.33) | <0.001 | 2.59 (1.06-6.31) | 0.037 | |
| Ki67 expression | <30% | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| ≥30% | 1.02 (1.01-1.03) | 0.001 | 1.03 (1.01-1.04) | 0.002 | |
| Carcinoma | No | 1.00 (Ref.) | / | / | |
| Yes | 0.81 (0.77-1.34) | 0.116 | / | / | |
| CX3CL1 | Negative | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| Positive | 2.16 (1.59-2.93) | <0.001 | 2.17 (1.08-2.39) | 0.006 | |
HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AHR, adjusted hazard ratio; Ref, reference; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 2(A) The mRNA expression of CX3CL1 in TCCSUP, 5637 and T24 cells. The mRNA expression of CX3CL1 in TCCSUP cells was significantly higher than that in 5637 and T24 cells. (B) Difference in CX3CL1 mRNA levels between NC and KD TCCSUP cells. The CX3CL1 gene of TCCSUP cells in KD group was knocked down, and the knockdown rate was verified by qPCR. (C) Difference in TCCSUP cell proliferation between NC and KD groups determined by the MTT method. The results showed that cell proliferation in the KD group(Orange line) was significantly decreased. (D, E) Cell invasion of NC and KD cells determined by Transwell assays. The results showed that after CX3CL1 was knocked down, cell invasion in the KD group was significantly reduced. ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Effects of CX3CL1 knockdown on (A) tumor volume and (B) weight changes in a nude mouse subcutaneous tumor model of bladder cancer. The results showed that compared with the control group, the volume and weight of subcutaneous tumors in the KD group decreased significantly. (C) Subcutaneous tumor in KD (up) and NC (down) group. (D) Hematoxylin & Eosin staining of the tumor cells. KD, knockdown; NC, negative control.
Figure 4(A) Classic pathway enrichment analysis and disease and function analysis based on IPA by GeneChip PrimeView. Our experiments suggested that when CX3CL1 is inhibited, the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway is inhibited, the function of promoting tumor growth is inhibited, and tumor death is enhanced. (B) Chip volcano plot (left) and hierarchical clustering (right): in the volcano plot, the abscissa represents the multiple of the gene expression difference (transformed by log2), the ordinate represents the significant FDR of the difference (transformed by log10), the red dots were selected with |Fold Change|>1.5 and FDR<0.05 as the screening criteria for genes that were significantly differentially expressed, and the gray dots are other genes that were not significantly differentially expressed; in the hierarchical clustering data, red means that gene expression was relatively upregulated, green means that gene expression was relatively downregulated, black means that the degree of gene expression did not change significantly, and gray means that the signal intensity of the gene was not detected. (C) Relative expression of downstream genes and proteins in the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway between NC and KD cells (Western blot). NC, normal control group; KD, CX3CL1 gene knockdown group.