Literature DB >> 34671546

Is blockchain ready for orthopaedics? A systematic review.

Calum Thomson1, Russell Beale2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The unique attributes of distributed ledger blockchain systems including robust security, immutability, transparency, and decentralisation, make them highly suitable solutions for many healthcare-related problems. This review examines the potential applications for blockchain technology in the field of orthopaedics, by taking a systematic approach to the evolving blockchain literature and mapping potential use cases against the current needs of orthopaedic practice.
METHOD: A literature search was performed using Pubmed, EMBASE, OVID and the Cochrane library with the primary aim of identifying detailed accounts of blockchain solutions and use cases in healthcare. These articles were then reviewed and mapped against current orthopaedic practice to illustrate applications specific to that specialty.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one papers were identified which described case studies, simulations, or detailed proposals of blockchain solutions in healthcare. Most studies described blockchain solutions at the simulated or prototype testing phase, with only 10 case studies describing blockchains in "real-world" use. The most frequently cited use cases for blockchain technology involved the storage, security and sharing of electronic medical records. Other blockchain solutions focused on the "Internet of Things", research, COVID 19, supply chains and radiology. There were no solutions focusing specifically on orthopaedics. Many of the described blockchain solutions had considerable scope for application in orthopaedic practice however, providing the potential for greater inter-institutional collaboration, cross border data exchange, enhanced patient participation, and more robust and transparent research practices.
CONCLUSION: Blockchain solutions for healthcare are increasing in number and scope and have multiple applications relevant to orthopaedic practice. The orthopaedic community needs to be aware of this innovative and growing field of computer science so that surgeons can leverage the power of blockchain safely for the future of orthopaedics.
© 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blockchain; Distributed ledger; Image sharing; Implant tracking; Internet of things; Research collaboration

Year:  2021        PMID: 34671546      PMCID: PMC8507193          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  28 in total

1.  Efficient Clinical Data Sharing Framework Based on Blockchain Technology.

Authors:  Karamo Kanagi; Cooper Cheng-Yuan Ku; Li-Kai Lin; Wen-Huai Hsieh
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  How Blockchain Technology Can Transform the Systematic Review/Meta-analysis Process?

Authors:  Agam Bansal; Chandan Garg; Rana P Padappayil; Samiksha Gupta; Vardhmaan Jain; Mahum Nadeem; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  A framework for secure and decentralized sharing of medical imaging data via blockchain consensus.

Authors:  Vishal Patel
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  A Patient-Centric Health Information Exchange Framework Using Blockchain Technology.

Authors:  Yan Zhuang; Lincoln R Sheets; Yin-Wu Chen; Zon-Yin Shae; Jeffrey J P Tsai; Chi-Ren Shyu
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  Prototype of running clinical trials in an untrustworthy environment using blockchain.

Authors:  Daniel R Wong; Sanchita Bhattacharya; Atul J Butte
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Secure and Scalable mHealth Data Management Using Blockchain Combined With Client Hashchain: System Design and Validation.

Authors:  Tomomitsu Motohashi; Tomonobu Hirano; Kosuke Okumura; Makiko Kashiyama; Daisuke Ichikawa; Taro Ueno
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Evaluation of patient perception towards dynamic health data sharing using blockchain based digital consent with the Dovetail digital consent application: A cross sectional exploratory study.

Authors:  George Despotou; Jill Evans; William Nash; Alexandra Eavis; Tim Robbins; Theodoros N Arvanitis
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2020-05-12

8.  An Architecture and Management Platform for Blockchain-Based Personal Health Record Exchange: Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Hsiu-An Lee; Hsin-Hua Kung; Jai Ganesh Udayasankaran; Boonchai Kijsanayotin; Alvin B Marcelo; Louis R Chao; Chien-Yeh Hsu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  FHIRChain: Applying Blockchain to Securely and Scalably Share Clinical Data.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Jules White; Douglas C Schmidt; Gunther Lenz; S Trent Rosenbloom
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 7.271

10.  Blockchain-Authenticated Sharing of Genomic and Clinical Outcomes Data of Patients With Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Benjamin Scott Glicksberg; Shohei Burns; Rob Currie; Ann Griffin; Zhen Jane Wang; David Haussler; Theodore Goldstein; Eric Collisson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Industry 5.0 in Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Madhan Jeyaraman; Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy; Naveen Jeyaraman
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 1.033

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.