| Literature DB >> 34671448 |
Kunhao Tang1, Ruogu Luo1, Sanhua Zhang1.
Abstract
In order to explore the application of artificial neural network in rehabilitation evaluation, a kind of ANN stable and reliable artificial intelligence algorithm is proposed. By learning the existing clinical gait data, this method extracted the gait characteristic parameters of patients with different ages, disease types and course of disease, and repeated data iteration and finally simulated the corresponding gait parameters of patients. Experiments showed that the trained ANN had the same score as the human for most of the data (82.2%, Cohen's kappa = 0.743). There was a strong correlation between ANN and improved Ashworth scores as assessed by human raters (r = 0.825, P < 0.01). As a stable and reliable artificial intelligence algorithm, ANN can provide new ideas and methods for clinical rehabilitation evaluation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34671448 PMCID: PMC8523250 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3959844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Machine learning classification.The ANN to be discussed is a supervised machine learning category requiring data training.
Figure 2Fitting function simulation provides a visual explanation of these two concepts through the function image.
Figure 3Sample IMU acceleration data of subjects at different stages. Due to the different severity, the patient's arm presents different distribution rules in the process of performing the same activity.
Figure 4Sample data of subject's forearm IMU sensor. As for the logistic regression model, its average accuracy in 5 categories was 27.80%, with an average AUROC of 0.53 and AUPRC of 0.35.
Brunnstrom staging confusion matrix (TARM).
| Ground truth | Classified sum | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prediction | Stage II | Stage II | Stage III | Stage IV | Stage V | Stage VI | |
| Stage III | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| Stage IV | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |
| Stage V | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |
| Stage VI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| No. of samples | 7 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | |
| Accuracy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||