| Literature DB >> 34671413 |
Zhaofang Zhang1, Mei Dong2, Yuejiao Han3, Hui Lin4, Anying Li5, Na Wang5, Xia Zhang6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the application effect of medical care integration combined with family intervention under the evidence-based nursing mode on child patients with severe hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) and its influence on intestinal function.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34671413 PMCID: PMC8523275 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9599711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of child patients' general information.
| Group | Group A ( | Group B ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender ( | 0.033 | 0.855 | ||
| Male | 30 | 31 | ||
| Female | 30 | 29 | ||
| Mean body temperature (°C, mean ± SD) | 38.98 ± 0.21 | 38.95 ± 0.23 | 0.746 | 0.457 |
| Mean age (years, mean ± SD) | 5.40 ± 1.21 | 5.41 ± 0.91 | 0.051 | 0.959 |
| HFMD symptom ( | ||||
| Drooling | 45 | 46 | 0.046 | 0.831 |
| Food refusal | 35 | 34 | 0.034 | 0.853 |
| Dysthesia | 32 | 31 | 0.033 | 0.855 |
| Oral burning sensation ( | 42 | 40 | 0.154 | 0.695 |
| Buttock rash ( | 36 | 37 | 0.035 | 0.852 |
| Rash at the end of the hands and feet ( | 55 | 56 | 0.120 | 0.729 |
| Convulsion ( | 20 | 23 | 0.326 | 0.568 |
| Mean disease duration ( | 3.54 ± 0.54 | 3.56 ± 0.37 | 0.237 | 0.813 |
| Appearance time of mouth herpes ( | 1.29 ± 0.21 | 1.28 ± 0.22 | 0.255 | 0.799 |
| Education degree of parents ( | −0.218 | 0.827 | ||
| Senior high school and below | 17 | 14 | ||
| Junior college/university | 38 | 40 | ||
| Above university | 5 | 6 |
Figure 1Comparison of children's treatment compliance. The horizontal axis from left to right indicates diet compliance, behavior compliance, exercise compliance, and medication compliance, and the vertical axis indicates children (cases); the black areas indicate group A, and the gray areas indicate group B; indicates P < 0.05.
Comparison of children's recovery-related indexes (mean ± SD, d).
| Group | Fever clearance time | Time of oral pain alleviated | Time of oral ulcer healed | Time of skin herpes alleviated | Length of stay | Feeding time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A ( | 2.78 ± 0.21 | 2.12 ± 0.20 | 2.89 ± 0.75 | 3.45 ± 0.35 | 7.54 ± 0.87 | 4.10 ± 0.35 |
| Group B ( | 4.25 ± 0.35 | 3.10 ± 0.68 | 3.68 ± 0.70 | 5.48 ± 0.42 | 8.87 ± 1.10 | 6.24 ± 0.31 |
|
| 27.897 | 10.710 | 5.965 | 28.761 | 7.346 | 35.454 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of children's quality of life after intervention (mean ± SD, points).
| Group | Physical score | Character score | Emotional score | Social score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A ( | 70.11 ± 4.98 | 66.98 ± 5.48 | 72.68 ± 5.98 | 69.98 ± 5.44 |
| Group B ( | 58.98 ± 5.98 | 54.12 ± 5.65 | 62.11 ± 5.74 | 54.87 ± 4.58 |
|
| 11.078 | 12.656 | 9.877 | 16.459 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of children's gastrointestinal tract function indexes (mean ± SD).
| Group | ET (EU/ml) | DAO (U/ml) | D-LA (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Group A ( | 0.65 ± 0.11 | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 7.40 ± 0.68 | 3.65 ± 0.45 | 14.98 ± 1.98 | 8.11 ± 1.23 |
| Group B ( | 0.66 ± 0.12 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 7.41 ± 0.64 | 4.55 ± 0.65 | 14.67 ± 1.94 | 12.32 ± 1.56 |
|
| 0.476 | 19.926 | 0.083 | 8.818 | 0.866 | 16.415 |
|
| 0.635 | <0.001 | 0.934 | <0.001 | 0.388 | <0.001 |
Figure 2Comparison of children's eating pain scores. The horizontal axis from left to right indicates ≤2 points, 3 points, and ≥4 points, and the vertical axis indicates children (cases); the black areas indicate group A, and the gray areas indicate group B; indicates P < 0.05.