Literature DB >> 34670036

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Delta Variant in Adolescents.

Ben Y Reis1, Noam Barda2, Michael Leshchinsky2, Eldad Kepten2, Miguel A Hernán3, Marc Lipsitch3, Noa Dagan4, Ran D Balicer4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34670036      PMCID: PMC8552532          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2114290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: The B.1.617.2 (delta) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the dominant strain circulating in many regions worldwide. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) was found to be effective in preventing infection with the delta variant in a recent observational study,[1] but other reports have suggested reduced vaccine effectiveness against this variant.[2,3] On May 10, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the emergency use of BNT162b2 in adolescents 12 years of age or older on the basis of a clinical trial that had been conducted before the delta variant had become prevalent in the United States.[4] Additional evidence was needed regarding the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine among adolescents, particularly against the delta variant. We sought to estimate the vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 against the delta variant among vaccinated adolescents for whom an unvaccinated match was found. We used data from Clalit Health Services, the largest health care organization in Israel, to conduct an observational cohort study involving adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years who had no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection noted in their electronic medical record and who had been vaccinated between June 8 and September 14, 2021. According to the sequencing of samples obtained from infected persons that was performed by the Israeli Ministry of Health during this period, the delta variant was responsible for more than 95% of new infections in the general population in Israel. We used the same methods that were used in our previous studies of vaccine effectiveness, which were conducted in the same health care organization using the same database.[5] (See the Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.) Vaccine effectiveness was defined as 1 minus the risk ratio, which was estimated over several follow-up periods for documented SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic Covid-19. More severe outcomes related to Covid-19 are rare in this age group. Of 184,905 vaccinated adolescents, 130,464 met the eligibility requirements, and 94,354 of these vaccine recipients were successfully matched with 94,354 unvaccinated controls (Fig. S1 and the Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix). The eligible population was similar to the matched population with respect to several demographic and clinical characteristics (Tables S1 and S2). The frequency of polymerase-chain-reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2 was similar in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations (9.4 and 9.9 tests per 100 persons per week, respectively). The median follow-up was 27 days after baseline, which was defined as the administration of the first dose among the vaccine recipients. Kaplan–Meier curves for SARS-CoV-2 infection in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were similar during the initial days, after which the incidence began to rise more slowly in the vaccinated group (Table 1 and Fig. S2).
Table 1

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine among Adolescents.*

Time PeriodDocumented SARS-CoV-2 InfectionSymptomatic Covid-19
Unvaccinated GroupVaccinated GroupVaccine Effectiveness(95% CI)Risk Difference(95% CI)UnvaccinatedGroupVaccinated GroupVaccine Effectiveness(95% CI)Risk Difference(95% CI)
events (no. at risk)%no. of events/100,000 personsevents (no. at risk)%no. of events/100,000 persons
Days 14–20 after first dose463(69,408)192(69,609)59(52–65)436.5(363.1–510.2)95(70,203)41(70,227)57(39–71)86.1(49.0–123.7)
Days 21–27 after first dose400(56,997)137(57,358)66(59–72)514.7(423.1–590.6)84(57,803)15(57,878)82(73–91)133.0(101.1–169.4)
Days 7–21 after second dose818(46,384)79(46,815)90(88–92)2032.7(1866.3–2184.6)151(47,194)11(47,303)93(88–97)379.6(317.0–451.3)

Data are for adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years who were members of Clalit Health Services from June 8 to September 14, 2021. The study population included 94,354 adolescents in both the unvaccinated and vaccinated groups.

The estimated vaccine effectiveness against documented SARS-CoV-2 infection was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52 to 65) on days 14 through 20 after the first dose, 66% (95% CI, 59 to 72) on days 21 to 27 after the first dose, and 90% (95% CI, 88 to 92) on days 7 to 21 after the second dose. The estimated vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic Covid-19 was 57% (95% CI, 39 to 71) on days 14 to 20 after the first dose, 82% (95% CI, 73 to 91) on days 21 to 27 after the first dose, and 93% (95% CI, 88 to 97) on days 7 to 21 after the second dose. In a recent randomized trial involving 1983 vaccinated adolescents between the ages of 12 and 15 years with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, investigators estimated that the vaccine effectiveness of two doses of BNT162b2 was 100% (95% CI, 75 to 100) against symptomatic infection by non-delta variants.[4] The present observational study provides substantially more precise estimates of vaccine effectiveness among adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years for both documented infection and symptomatic disease in a setting in which the delta variant was predominant. Our estimates of the effectiveness of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine against the delta variant among adolescents are similar to estimates of effectiveness against the alpha variant in the general population with the use of the same study design[5] and are similar to the estimate of 88% (95% CI, 85 to 90) against the delta variant in the general population in an observational study that used a different design.[1] Our results show that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was highly effective in the first few weeks after vaccination against both documented infection and symptomatic Covid-19 with the delta variant among adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years.
  32 in total

1.  Post-vaccination infection rates and modification of COVID-19 symptoms in vaccinated UK school-aged children and adolescents: A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Erika Molteni; Liane S Canas; Kerstin Kläser; Jie Deng; Sunil S Bhopal; Robert C Hughes; Liyuan Chen; Benjamin Murray; Eric Kerfoot; Michela Antonelli; Carole H Sudre; Joan Capdevila Pujol; Lorenzo Polidori; Anna May; Prof Alexander Hammers; Jonathan Wolf; Prof Tim D Spector; Claire J Steves; Prof Sebastien Ourselin; Michael Absoud; Marc Modat; Prof Emma L Duncan
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-07-08

2.  Association of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccination or a Prior Positive Test Result in Adolescents during the Delta Variant Surge in Kentucky.

Authors:  Kevin B Spicer; Connor Glick; Alyson M Cavanaugh; Douglas Thoroughman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.314

3.  Risk of Infection and Hospitalization Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children and Adolescents in New York After the Emergence of the Omicron Variant.

Authors:  Vajeera Dorabawila; Dina Hoefer; Ursula E Bauer; Mary T Bassett; Emily Lutterloh; Eli S Rosenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 157.335

4.  Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Critical Covid-19 in Adolescents.

Authors:  Samantha M Olson; Margaret M Newhams; Natasha B Halasa; Ashley M Price; Julie A Boom; Leila C Sahni; Pia S Pannaraj; Katherine Irby; Tracie C Walker; Stephanie P Schwartz; Aline B Maddux; Elizabeth H Mack; Tamara T Bradford; Jennifer E Schuster; Ryan A Nofziger; Melissa A Cameron; Kathleen Chiotos; Melissa L Cullimore; Shira J Gertz; Emily R Levy; Michele Kong; Natalie Z Cvijanovich; Mary A Staat; Satoshi Kamidani; Brandon M Chatani; Samina S Bhumbra; Katherine E Bline; Mary G Gaspers; Charlotte V Hobbs; Sabrina M Heidemann; Mia Maamari; Heidi R Flori; Janet R Hume; Matt S Zinter; Kelly N Michelson; Laura D Zambrano; Angela P Campbell; Manish M Patel; Adrienne G Randolph
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 176.079

Review 5.  Considerations for the Safe Operation of Schools During the Coronavirus Pandemic.

Authors:  Ronan Lordan; Samantha Prior; Elizabeth Hennessy; Amruta Naik; Soumita Ghosh; Georgios K Paschos; Carsten Skarke; Kayla Barekat; Taylor Hollingsworth; Sydney Juska; Liudmila L Mazaleuskaya; Sarah Teegarden; Abigail L Glascock; Sean Anderson; Hu Meng; Soon-Yew Tang; Aalim Weljie; Lisa Bottalico; Emanuela Ricciotti; Perla Cherfane; Antonijo Mrcela; Gregory Grant; Kristen Poole; Natalie Mayer; Michael Waring; Laura Adang; Julie Becker; Susanne Fries; Garret A FitzGerald; Tilo Grosser
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  mRNA vaccines against COVID-19: a showcase for the importance of microbial biotechnology.

Authors:  Harald Brüssow
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  The COVID-19 pandemic in children and young people during 2020-2021: A complex discussion on vaccination.

Authors:  Igor Rudan; Davies Adeloye; Vittal Katikireddi; Josie Murray; Colin Simpson; Syed Ahmar Shah; Chris Robertson; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 7.664

Review 8.  Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against Delta (B.1.617.2) Variant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Ali Pormohammad; Mohammad Zarei; Saied Ghorbani; Mehdi Mohammadi; Saeideh Aghayari Sheikh Neshin; Alireza Khatami; Diana L Turner; Shirin Djalalinia; Seied Asadollah Mousavi; Heydar Ali Mardani-Fard; Amir Kasaeian; Raymond J Turner
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-25

9.  Using a Machine Learning Approach to Monitor COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events (VAE) from Twitter Data.

Authors:  Andrew T Lian; Jingcheng Du; Lu Tang
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 10.  SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals: measurement, causes and impact.

Authors:  Marc Lipsitch; Florian Krammer; Gili Regev-Yochay; Yaniv Lustig; Ran D Balicer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 53.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.