Literature DB >> 34669175

Effects of and Response to Mechanical Loading on the Knee.

David S Logerstedt1, Jay R Ebert2,3,4, Toran D MacLeod5, Bryan C Heiderscheit6, Tim J Gabbett7,8, Brian J Eckenrode9.   

Abstract

Mechanical loading to the knee joint results in a differential response based on the local capacity of the tissues (ligament, tendon, meniscus, cartilage, and bone) and how those tissues subsequently adapt to that load at the molecular and cellular level. Participation in cutting, pivoting, and jumping sports predisposes the knee to the risk of injury. In this narrative review, we describe different mechanisms of loading that can result in excessive loads to the knee, leading to ligamentous, musculotendinous, meniscal, and chondral injuries or maladaptations. Following injury (or surgery) to structures around the knee, the primary goal of rehabilitation is to maximize the patient's response to exercise at the current level of function, while minimizing the risk of re-injury to the healing tissue. Clinicians should have a clear understanding of the specific injured tissue(s), and rehabilitation should be driven by knowledge of tissue-healing constraints, knee complex and lower extremity biomechanics, neuromuscular physiology, task-specific activities involving weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions, and training principles. We provide a practical application for prescribing loading progressions of exercises, functional activities, and mobility tasks based on their mechanical load profile to knee-specific structures during the rehabilitation process. Various loading interventions can be used by clinicians to produce physical stress to address body function, physical impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. By modifying the mechanical load elements, clinicians can alter the tissue adaptations, facilitate motor learning, and resolve corresponding physical impairments. Providing different loads that create variable tensile, compressive, and shear deformation on the tissue through mechanotransduction and specificity can promote the appropriate stress adaptations to increase tissue capacity and injury tolerance. Tools for monitoring rehabilitation training loads to the knee are proposed to assess the reactivity of the knee joint to mechanical loading to monitor excessive mechanical loads and facilitate optimal rehabilitation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34669175     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01579-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  326 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of human movement and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Tung-Wu Lu; Chu-Fen Chang
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Risk compensation, motivation, injuries, and biomechanics in competitive sport.

Authors:  A S McIntosh
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Common injuries in athletes' knee: experience of a specialized center.

Authors:  Alexandre Pedro Nicolini; Rogério Teixeira de Carvalho; Marcelo Mitsuro Matsuda; Jorge Filho Sayum; Moisés Cohen
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

4.  Comparing the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury in collegiate lacrosse, soccer, and basketball players: implications for anterior cruciate ligament mechanism and prevention.

Authors:  Leanne C S Mihata; Anthony I Beutler; Barry P Boden
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: A 10-year study.

Authors:  M Majewski; Habelt Susanne; Steinbrück Klaus
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Effect of physical exercise on cartilage volume and thickness in vivo: MR imaging study.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Tieschky; S C Faber; M Haubner; H Kolem; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Mechanisms, prediction, and prevention of ACL injuries: Cut risk with three sharpened and validated tools.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Mark V Paterno; Carmen E Quatman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Collegiate ACL Injury Rates Across 15 Sports: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System Data Update (2004-2005 Through 2012-2013).

Authors:  Julie Agel; Todd Rockwood; David Klossner
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.638

9.  A systematic approach to the characterisation of human impact injury scenarios in sport.

Authors:  Thomas Payne; Séan Mitchell; Ben Halkon; Richard Bibb
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 10.  A conceptual model and detailed framework for stress-related, strain-related, and overuse athletic injury.

Authors:  Judd T Kalkhoven; Mark L Watsford; Franco M Impellizzeri
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.