Literature DB >> 34669112

The role of machine learning method in the synthesis and biological ınvestigation of heterocyclic compounds.

Arif Mermer1.   

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) methods have attracted increasing interest in chemistry as in all fields of science in recent years. This method is of great importance for the design of targeted bioactive compounds, especially by avoiding loss of time, money, and chemicals. There are lots of online web-based platforms such as LibSVM and OCHEM for the application of ML methods. In this paper, it has been examined the literature data on the activity predictions of heterocyclic compounds, biological activity results such as antiurease, HIV-1 Integrase, E. Coli DNA Gyrase B, and antifungal, pharmacophore-based studies, synthesis, and finding possible inhibitors using different machine learning methods.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological activity; Heterocyclic compound; Machine Learning; QSAR; Statistical coefficient

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34669112     DOI: 10.1007/s11030-021-10264-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Divers        ISSN: 1381-1991            Impact factor:   2.943


  28 in total

1.  Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.

Authors:  Vladimir Svetnik; Andy Liaw; Christopher Tong; J Christopher Culberson; Robert P Sheridan; Bradley P Feuston
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  Advanced statistics: linear regression, part II: multiple linear regression.

Authors:  Keith A Marill
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 3.  Cheminformatics approaches to analyze diversity in compound screening libraries.

Authors:  Lakshmi B Akella; David DeCaprio
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.

Authors:  Jérôme Hert; Peter Willett; David J Wilton; Pierre Acklin; Kamal Azzaoui; Edgar Jacoby; Ansgar Schuffenhauer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  A renaissance of neural networks in drug discovery.

Authors:  Igor I Baskin; David Winkler; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 6.098

6.  Elaborate ligand-based modeling coupled with multiple linear regression and k nearest neighbor QSAR analyses unveiled new nanomolar mTOR inhibitors.

Authors:  Mohammad A Khanfar; Mutasem O Taha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Insights into pesticide toxicity against aquatic organism: QSTR models on Daphnia Magna.

Authors:  Lujue He; Keya Xiao; Cong Zhou; Guanglong Li; Hongbin Yang; Zhong Li; Jiagao Cheng
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Ana C Puhl; Kimberley M Zorn; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Jennifer J Klein; Anthony J Hickey; Alex M Clark
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 43.841

9.  QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Bruno J Neves; Rodolpho C Braga; Cleber C Melo-Filho; José Teófilo Moreira-Filho; Eugene N Muratov; Carolina Horta Andrade
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Large scale comparison of QSAR and conformal prediction methods and their applications in drug discovery.

Authors:  Nicolas Bosc; Francis Atkinson; Eloy Felix; Anna Gaulton; Anne Hersey; Andrew R Leach
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.